The Transforming Nature of Metaphors in Group Development: A Study in Group Theory

Abstract

It is proposed in this paper that members' creation of metaphors facilitates further expression and development of the group. Few methodologies for group inquiry help us in understanding the tacit awareness (Polanyi, 1959) of members as the group is in the process of interacting. One way of discovering members' awareness is by paying attention to their language, specifically their creation of metaphors. We would like to put forth propositions concerning metaphor and group process that suggest how: (1) paying attention to metaphors are indicators of a group's phase of development and can lead to a discovery of the tacit awareness of group members; (2) metaphor facilitates learning and overcomes resistance to otherwise difficult subjects; (3) metaphor is generative and facilitates contact between group members and in this way supports the growth and development of the group; and (4) as individuals articulate metaphors to express their feelings and perceptions while attempting to understand their experience in the group, they are constructing their own social reality. Therefore, to look at the group's metaphor is to see the group development, to identify the social construction of reality in its nascent stages. To support these propositions, we will cite data from various laboratory group experiences.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABRAMS, M. H. A glossary of literary terms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1957.

ARISTOTLE . Poetics. In W. D. Ross (Ed.), The works ofAristotle (Vol. 11). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.

BENNIS, W. G. , & SHEPHARD, H. R. A theory of group development. Human Relations, 1956, 9, 415-437.

BERGER, P. L. , & LUCKMAN, T. The social construction of reality. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1967.

BION, W. R. Experiences in groups. New York: Ballantine Books, 1959.

BLACK, M. Models and metaphors. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1962.

FREUD, S. Civilization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton, 1961.

HALEY, J. Uncommon therapy. New York: W.W. Norton, 1973.

LEE, D. Freedom and culture. Spectrum Books, 1959.

10.

ORTONY, A. Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 1975, 25(1), 45-53.

11.

PEPPER, S. World hypotheses. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, 1942.

12.

PETRIE, H. G. Metaphor and learning. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

13.

POLANYI, M. The study of man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.

14.

RICHARDS, J. A. The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936.

15.

SCHON, D. A. Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem solving in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

16.

SLATER, P. E. Microcosm. New York: Wiley, 1966.

17.

SRIVASTVA, S. OBERT, S. , & NEILSEN, E. Organizational analysis through group processes: A theoretical perspective for organization development. In C, Cooper (Ed.), Organizational development in the UK and USA: A joint evaluation. New York: Petrocello Books, 1977.

18.

TUCKMAN, B. W. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 384-399.

19.

TURNER, V. W. Dramas, fields and metaphors. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornerll University Press, 1974.

20.

WHORF, B. L. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1956.