The Influence of Positive and Negative Outcomes on Force Model Expectancy Predictions: Mixed Results from Two Samples

Abstract

The relative validity of valence-instrumentality-expectancy (VIE) force model predictions of performance, based on positive and negative outcome lists, was examined. Using an open-ended questionnaire, Army and Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadets generated positive and negative outcomes associated with participation in ROTC. VIE predictions were tested separately for the two samples using both self and supervisor ratings of performance. VIE composites based on the combined lists of outcomes significantly predicted both self and supervisor performance ratings in the Navy sample, and self-ratings in the Army sample. Limited support was obtained for the hypotheses that (1) positive outcome based VIE composites would correlate greater with performance than negative-based composites, and (2) VIE correlations with self-ratings would exceed those with supervisor ratings. The results were discussed in terms of how individuals process positive and negative outcome information related to high performance. Several suggestionsforfuture research designed to specify the nature of these processes were offered.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BOUCHER, J. , & OSGOOD, C. E. The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 1-8.

CAMPBELL, J. P. , & PRITCHARD, R. D. Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.

COHEN, J. , & COHEN, P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975.

HENEMAN, H. G. , & SCHWAB, D. P. An evaluation of research on expectancy theory predictions of employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 78, 1-9.

JAMES, L. R. , HARTMAN, A. , STEBBINS, M. W. , & JONES, A. P. Relationships between psychological climate and a VIE model for work motivation. Personnel Psychology, 1977, 30, 229-254.

KOPELMAN, R. E. Managing productivity in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986.

LAWLER, E. E. , & SUTTLE, J. L. Expectancy theory and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 9, 482-503.

LEON, F. R. Number of outcomes and accuracy of prediction in expectancy research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23, 251-267.

LEON, F. R. The role of positive and negative outcomes in the causation of motivational forces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 45-53.

10.

MATSUI, T. , & IREDA, A. Effectiveness of self-generated outcomes for improving prediction in expectancy theory research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 17, 289-298.

11.

MITCHELL, T. R. Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 1053-1077.

12.

MITCHELL, T. R. Expectancy-value models in organizational psychology. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982.

13.

MITCHELL, T. R. , & BIGLAN, A. Instrumentality theories: Current uses in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 432-454.

14.

PARKER, D. F. , & DYER, L. Expectancy theory as a within-person behavioral choice model: An empirical test of some conceptual and methodological refinements. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 17, 97-117.

15.

REINHARTH, L. , & WAHBA, M. A. A test of alternative models of expectancy theory. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 257-272.

16.

SCHWAB, D. P. , OLIAN-GOTTLIEB, J. D. , & HENEMAN, H. G. Between-subjects expectancy theory research: A statistical review of studies predicting effort and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 139-147.

17.

VROOM, V. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.

18.

WAHBA, M. A. , & HOUSE, R. J. Expectancy theory in work and motivation: Some logical and methodological issues. Human Relations, 1974, 27, 121-147.