This paper pursues the question of whether differences exist between influence patterns in decision making in public and private sector organizations. Results are reported from an analysis of the interest units appearing in 150 strategic decision-making processes studied in 30 British organizations. We conclude that, while there is an overall similarity in the involvement of types of interest units in the two sectors, there are notable differences in the influence exerted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AHARONI, Y., & LACHMAN, R.Can the manager's mind be nationalized?Organization Studies, 1982, 3, 33-46.
2.
ALDRICH, H. E.Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1979.
3.
BLAU, P. M., & SCOTT, W. R.Formal organizations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.
4.
BUTLER, R. J., ASTLEY, W. G., HICKSON, D. J., MALLORY, G. R., & WILSON, D. C.Strategic decision-making: Concepts of content and process. International Studies of Management and Organization, 1979, 9, 5-36.
5.
CAMERON, K. S.Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 604-632.
6.
CAMERON, K. S.Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 25-47.
7.
CLEGG, S.Power, rule and domination. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.
8.
COMSTOCK, D. E.Dimensions of influence in organizations. Pacific Sociological Review, 1980, 23, 67-84.
9.
CROZIER, M.The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
10.
DAHL, R. A., & LINDBLOM, C. D.Politics, economics and welfare. New York: Harper and Row, 1953.
11.
DEWEY, J.The public and its problems. New York: Swallow, 1927.
12.
DUNCAN, R. B.Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 313-327.
13.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. T.Organization development in public agencies: Perceptives on theory and practices. Public Administration Review, 1969, 29, 367-368.
14.
HAGE, J.Theories of organizations: Form, process and transformation. New York: Wiley, 1980.
15.
HAMBRICK, D. C.Environment, strategy and power within top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26, 253-276.
16.
HAYES, D. C.The contingency theory of managerial accounting. The Accounting Review, 1977, 52, 22-39.
17.
HEYDEBRAND, W. V.Autonomy, complexity, and non-bureaucratic coordination in professional organizations. In W. V. Heyderbrand (Ed.), Comparative organizations: The results of empirical research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973, pp. 158-189.
18.
HICKSON, D. J., HININGS, C. R., LEE, C. A., SCHNECK, R. E., & PENNINGS, J. M.A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 216-229.
19.
HICKSON, D. J., BUTLER, R. J., CRAY, D., MALLORY, G. R., & WILSON, D. C.Comparing one hundred and fifty decision processes. In J. M. Pennings (Ed.), Organizational strategy and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
20.
HICKSON, D. J., BUTLER, R. J., CRAY, D., MALLORY, G. R., & WILSON, D. C.Top decisions: Strategic decision-making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, and Oxford: Blackwells, 1986.
21.
HININGS, C. R., HICKSON, D. J., PENNINGS, J. M., & SCHNECK. R. E.Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19, 22-24.
22.
HITT, M. A., & MIDDLEMIST, R. D.A methodology to develop the criteria weightings for assessing subunit effectiveness in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 356-374.
23.
HOLDAWAY, E. A., NEWBERRY, J. F., HICKSON, D. J., & HERON, R. P.Dimensions of organizations in complex societies: The educational sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 37-58.
24.
JOBSON, J. D., & SCHNECK, R.Constituent views of organizational effectiveness: Evidence from police organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 25-46.
25.
KATZ, D., & KAHN, R. L.The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1978.
26.
KENNY, G. K., & DUNK, A. S.Evaluative differences for production and marketing subunits: Australian managers' perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1986, 3, 99-109.
27.
KENNY, G. K., & WILSON, D. C.The interdepartmental influence of managers: Individual and subunit perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 1984, 21, 409-427.
28.
LACHMAN, R.Perception of role-environment among public and private sector executives. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1983.
29.
LAWRENCE, P. R., & LORSCH, J. W.Organization and environment. Homewood: Irwin, 1967.
30.
MAINZER, L. C.Political bureaucracy. Glenview: Scott, Foresman, 1973.
31.
MILLETT, J. D.Organization for the public purpose. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1966.
32.
MINTZBERG, H.The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
33.
MINTZBERG, H., RAISINGHANI, D., & THEORET, A.The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 246-275.
34.
MURRAY, M. A.Comparing public and private management: An exploratory study. Public Administration Review, 1975, 35, 364-371.
35.
PENNINGS, J. M., & GOODMAN, P. S.Toward a workable framework. In P. S. Goodman and J. M. Pennings (Ed.), New perspectives in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977, pp. 146-184.
36.
PERROW, C.Departmental power and perspectives in industrial firms. In M. N. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1970, pp. 59-89.
37.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G. R.The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
38.
PUGH, D. S., HICKSON, D. J., HININGS, C. R., & TURNER, C.The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 91-114.
39.
RAINEY, H. G.Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals and individual roles. Administration and Society, 1983, 15, 207-242.
40.
RAINEY, H. G., BACKOFF, R. W., & LEVINE, C. H.Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 1976, 36, 233-244.
41.
SALANCIK, G. R., & PFEFFER, J.The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19, 453-473.
42.
SAMUEL, Y., & MANNHEIM, B. F.A multidimensional approach toward a typology of bureaucracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15, 216-228.
43.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
44.
WILSON, D. C. Organizational strategy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bradford, 1980.
45.
WILSON, D. C.Electricity and resistance: A case study of innovation and politics. Organizations Studies, 1982, 3, 119-140.
46.
WILSON, D. C., & KENNY, G. K.Managerially perceived influence over intradepartmental decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 1985, 22, 155-174.
47.
WILSON, D. C., BUTLER, R. J., CRAY, D., HICKSON, D. J., & MALLORY, G. R.The limits of trade union power in organizational decision making. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1982, XX, 322-341.
48.
WOLL, P.American bureaucracy. New York: Norton, 1963.
