Alternative Ethics: The Relationship between the Wealth,Welfare,Work,and Leisure Ethic

Abstract

This study attempted to devise and evaluate four belief systems regarding how people acquire their money and spend their time: the Protestant Work Ethic (P WE) which emphasizes the positive feature of work, the leisure ethic which sees recreation rather than work as the main means to personalfulfillment, the wealth ethic which stresses the accumulation of wealth to ensure independence from others and work, and the welfare ethic which is based on the idea that one should exploit state benefits as a primary source of income. As predicted, the PWE was significantly negatively correlated with the leisure and welfare ethic which were themselves positively correlated. The wealth ethic was significantly correlated with the leisure ethic. Correlations between subscale scores derived from factor analysis and other related measures showed an interesting and predicted pattern of work-related beliefs. Results are discussed in terms of developing and testing belief systems associated with the PWE.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BLOOD, M. Work values and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 456-459.

BUCHHOLZ, R. Measurement of beliefs. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 1177-1188.

BUCHHOLZ, R. An empirical study of contemporary beliefs about work in American Society. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 219-227.

DICKSON, J. , & BUCHHOLZ, R. Managerial beliefs about work in Scotland and the USA. Journal of Management Studies, 1977, 14, 80-101.

DICKSON, J. , & BUCHHOLZ, R. Differences in beliefs about work between managers and blue collar workers. Journal of Management Studies, 1979, 16, 235-251.

FEATHER, N. Unemployment and its psychological correlates. A study of depressive symptoms, self-esteem, Protestant ethic values, attributional style, and apathy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1982, 34, 309-323.

FURNHAM, A. Attitudes toward the unemployed receiving social security benefits. Human Relations, 1982, 36, 135-150.

FURNHAM, A. The protestant work ethic: A review of the psychological literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 14, 87-104. (a)

FURNHAM, A. Work values and beliefs in Britain. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1984, 5, 281-291. (b)

10.

FURNHAM, A. The determinants of attitudes to taxation in Britain. Human Relations, 1984, 37, 535-546. (c)

11.

FURNHAM, A. Unemployment attribution theory, and mental health: A review of the British literature. International Journal of Mental Health, 1984, 13, 51-69. (d)

12.

FURNHAM, A. The determinants of attitudes towards social security recipients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1985, 24, 19-27. (a)

13.

FURNHAM, A. A short measure of economic beliefs. Personality and Individual differences, 1985, 6, 123-126. (b)

14.

FURNHAM, A. & LEWIS, A. The economic mind: The social psychology of economic behaviour. Sussex: Wheatsheaf, 1986.

15.

GOLDING, P. , & MIDDLETON, S. Images of welfare: Press and public attitudes to poverty. Oxford: Martin Roberton, 1983.

16.

KELVIN, P. , & JARRETT, J. Unemployment: Its social psychological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

17.

LEVENSON, H. Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internal-external world control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1974, 38, 377-383.

18.

LEVENSON, H. Multidimensional locus of control in prison inmates. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1986, 126, 117-119.

19.

MIRELS, H. , & GARRETT, J. Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 36, 40-44.

20.

RAY, J. The Protestant ethic in Australia. Journal of Social Psychology, 1982, 116, 127-138.

21.

RAY, J. , & NAJMAN, J. The generalizability of deferment of gratification. Journal of Social Psychology, 1986, 126, 117-119.

22.

SMITH, J. A quick measure of achievement motivation. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 12, 137-143.