Recently, Breaugh (1985) developed an instrument that measures three facets, i.e., method, scheduling, and criteria, of work autonomy. This paper presents the results of three studies designed to evaluate both the construct validity and the perceived usefulness of Breaugh's Work Autonomy Scales. In the first study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the underlying factor structure of the three work autonomy facet measures. Each of several methods for assessing the fit of a theoretical model confirmed that a three-facet model clearly fit the sample data. In Study 2, an experimental design was used to examine the degree to which individuals'self-reports of autonomy actually reflected objective conditions. A close correspondence between the experimental manipulations and subjective ratings of autonomy was found. In Study 3, the perceived usefulness of the information provided by the three autonomy scales was examined. In both an absolute and a comparative sense, i.e., in comparison to measuring autonomy globally, the three autonomy scales were perceived as providing valuable information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDAG, R. J., BARR, S. H., & BRIEF, A. P.The measurement of perceived task characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 415-431.
2.
BARTOL, K. M.Professionalism as a predictor of organizational commitment, role stress, and turnover: A multidimensional approach. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 815-821.
3.
BENTLER, P. M.Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal Modeling. In M. R. Rosenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, 1980, pp. 419-456.
4.
BENTLER, P. M., & BONETT, D. G.Significance tests and goodness of fit in analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 588-606.
5.
BREAUGH, J. A.The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 1985, 38, 551-570.
6.
BRECKLER, S. J.Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 47, 1191-1205.
7.
CHUNG, K. H.Motivational theories and practices. Columbus, Ohio: Grid Publishing, 1977.
8.
COOK, J. D., HEPWORTH, S. J., WALL, T. D., & WARR, P. B.The experience of work. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
9.
CUMMINGS, T. G., & MOLLOY, E. S.Improving productivity and the quality of work life. New York: Praeger, 1977.
10.
DeCOTIIS, T. A., & KOYS, D. J.The identification and measurement of the dimensions of organizational climate. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1980, 171-175.
11.
GRAEN, G., & SCHIEMANN, W.Leader-member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 206-212.
12.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.
13.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Motivation through the design of work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250-279.
14.
JANS, N. A.Organizational factors and work involvement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 35, 382-396.
15.
JORESKOG, K. G., & SORBOM, D.LISREL VI. Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software, 1984.
16.
KELLEY, H., & THIBAUT, J.Interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.
17.
LANGER, E. J.The psychology of control. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1983.
18.
LOHER, B. T., NOE, R. A., MOELLER, N. L., & FITZGERALD, M. P.A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70, 280-289.
19.
LONG, J. S.Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1983.
20.
MARSH, H. M., & HOCEVAR, D.Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 1985, 97, 562-582.
21.
MORTIMER, J. T. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Los Angeles, 1985.
22.
ROBERTS, K. H., & GLICK, W.The job characteristics approach to task design: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 193-217.
23.
SCHEIN, E. H.Career dynamics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1978.
24.
SCHNAKE, M. E.An empirical assessment of the effects of affective response in the measurement of organizational climate. Personnel psychology, 1983, 36, 791-807.
25.
SCHWAB, D. p.Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2)y. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1980, pp. 3-43.
26.
SIMS, H. P., SZILAGYI, A., & KELLER, R. T.The measurement of job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 19, 196-213.
27.
STEERS, R. M., & BRAUNSTEIN, D. N.A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1976, 9, 251-266.
28.
STONE, E. F., & GEUTAL, H. G.An empirical derivation of the dimensions along which characteristics of jobs are perceived. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 376-396.
29.
TURNER, A. N., & LAWRENCE, P. R.Industrial job and the worker. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1965.
30.
WERSSOWETZ, R. O., BEER, M.Human resources at Hewlett-Packard. Harvard Business School Case, 1982, 9-482-125.
31.
WHITESTONE, D., & SCHLESINGER, L. A.People Express. Harvard Business School Case, 1983, 9-483-103.
32.
YUKL, G. A., & NEMEROFF, W.Identification and measurement of specific categories of leadership behavior: A progress report. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in leadership. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979.
