Sex Ratios,Sex Role Spillover,and Sex at Work: A Comparison of Men's and Women's Experiences

Abstract

Sex-role spillover is the carryover of gender-based roles into the work setting. It is exacerbated by having a highly skewed ratio of the sexes at work. The sex roles associated with the majority sex become incorporated into the work roles. In male-dominated jobs, activity, rationality, and aggressiveness are emphasized, whereas nurturance and passivity are associated with “women's work. “ The implications of sex-role spillover for sexual behavior at work was investigated through analysis of a telephone survey of working adults in Los Angeles County in 1980. Sex-role spillover affects people in traditional work by having their sex role and work role merged together, and affects people in nontraditional work by the fact that they are a visible minority and their sex does not correspond to the sex roles normally associated with their jobs. In the case of sexual behavior at work, the fallout of sex role spillover is more visibly negative for women than for men. Very few men work in nontraditional or integrated jobs. Women in traditional jobs who work a great deal with men face the problem of being seen by the men as sex objects. Women in nontraditional jobs face the problems of being visible role deviants and attract sexual overtures. Sex role spillover is not a major problem in integrated jobs because the sex ratios are fairly balanced and, hence, neither male nor female sex roles are emphasized. Therefore, there is little sexual harassment in sex-integrated jobs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABBEY, A.

Sex differences in attribution for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness?

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42, 830-838 .

BELLER, A. H. Trends in occupational segregation by sex and race. In B. Reskin (Ed.), Sex-segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press , 1984.

BELLER, A. H. Changes in the sex composition of U.S. occupations, 1960-1981 . The Journal of Human Resources, 1985, 20, 235-250 .

BEM, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155-162 .

BEM, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing . Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 354-364 .

BENET, M. K. The secretarial ghetto. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1972.

BREWER, M. B. , & KRAMER, R. M. The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior . Annual Review of Psychology, 1985, 36, 219-243 .

CONSTANTINOPLE, A. Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum . Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 389-407 .

CRINO, M. D. , WHITE, M. L. , & DeSANCTIS, G. L.

Female participation rates and the occupational prestige of the professions: Are they inversely related?

Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1983, 22, 243-255 .

10.

DEAUX, K. Sex and gender . Annual Review of Psychology, 1985, 36, 49-81 .

11.

DOYLE, J. A. The male experience. Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown , 1983.

12.

FAIRHURST, G. T. , & SNAVELY, B. K. A test of the social isolation of male tokens . Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26, 353-361 . (a)

13.

FAIRHURST, G. T. , & SNAVELY, B. K. Majority and token minority group relationships: Power acquisition and communication . Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8, 292-300 . (b)

14.

GRADY, K. E. Sex as a social label: The illusion of sex differences. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York, 1977.

15.

GUTEK, B. A. Experiences of sexual harassment: Results from a representative survey . In S. Tangri (Chair), Sexual harassment at work: Evidence, remedies, and implications. Symposium conducted at the convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August 1981.

16.

GUTEK, B. A. Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1985.

17.

GUTEK, B. A. , & DUNWOODY-MILLER, V. Understanding sex in the workplace. In A. H. Stromberg , L. Larwood , & B. A. Gutek (Eds.), Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills: Sage , 1986.

18.

GUTEK, B. A. , & MORASCH, B. Sex-ratios, sex role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work . Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38(4), 55-74 .

19.

GUTEK, B. A. , MORASCH, B. , & COHEN, A. G. Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1983, 22, 30-48 .

20.

GUTEK, B. A. , COHEN, A. G. , & KONRAD, A. M. Group proportions and sex-role stereotypes: Explaining social-sexual behavior in the workplace. Unpublished manuscript, Claremont Graduate School , 1986. (a)

21.

GUTEK, B. , LARWOOD, L. , & STROMBERG, A. Women at work. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), Review of industrial/organizational psychology (Vol. 1). London: Wiley , 1986, pp. 217-234. (b)

22.

HEARN, J. Sexism, men's sexuality in management: The seen yet unnoticed case of men's sexuality . In G. Burrell (Chair), Sexuality, power, and organizational theory. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego, August 1985.

23.

JACOBS, J. A. The sex-segregation of occupations and the career patterns of women. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Harvard University, 1983.

24.

KANTER, R. M. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books , 1977. (a)

25.

KANTER, R. M. Some effects of proportions of group life: Skewed sex-ratios and responses to token women . American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82, 965-990 . (b)

26.

KESSLER, S. J. , & McKENNA, W. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley , 1978.

27.

KONRAD, A. M. , & GUTEK, B. A. Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31(4).

28.

LAWS, J. L. The psychology of tokens: An analysis . Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 51-67 .

29.

LAWS, J. L. The second X: Sex role and social role. New York: Elsevier , 1979.

30.

MADDEN, J. F. The persistence of pay differentials: The economics of sex discrimination. In L. Larwood , A. H. Stromberg , & B. A. Gutek (Eds.), Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills: Sage , 1985, pp. 76-114.

31.

NIEVA, V. F. , & GUTEK, B. A. Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger , 1981.

32.

NORTHCRAFT, G. , & MARTIN, J. Double jeopardy: Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries. In B. A. Gutek (Ed.), Sex-role stereotyping and affirmative action policy. Los Angeles: UCLA Institute for Industrial Relations , 1982.

33.

OPPENHEIMER, V. K. The sex-labeling of jobs . Industrial Relations, 1968, 7, 219-234 .

34.

OPPENHEIMER, V. K. Demographic influence on female employment and the status of women . American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 946-961 .

35.

RESKIN, B. Sex-segregation in the workplace: Trends, explorations, remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press , 1984.

36.

SUCHNER, R. W. Sex ratios and occupational prestige: Three failures to replicate a sexist bias . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5, 236-239 .

37.

TAYLOR, S. E. , FISKE, S. T. , ETCOFF, N. L. , & RUDERMAN, A. J. Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 35, 778-793 .

38.

TOUHEY, J. C. Effects of additional men on prestige and desirability of occupation typically performed by women . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 330-335 . (a)

39.

TOUHEY, J. C. Effects of additional women professionals on ratings of occupational prestige and desirability . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 86-89 . (b)

40.

TREIMAN, D. J. , & HARTMANN, H. I. (Eds.), Women, work and wages: Equal pay for jobs of equal value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press , 1981.

41.

WHITE, M. C. , CRINO, M. D. , & DeSANCTIS, G. L. Ratings of prestige and desirability: Effects of additional women entering selected business occupations . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981, 7, 588-592 .