This research investigates the perceptions supervisors have of their female employees' communication proficiency, assuming, as has been repeatedly discussed in the literature, that communication skills are a critical component of organizational effectiveness and promotability. In particular, comparisons were made between evaluations of supervisors on a variety of communication competencies and female employees' self-evaluations. Similar comparisons were made between the supervisors' assessment of the importance of future training in each skill and the females' own assessment of their need for future training. While this research is exploratory in nature, the results demonstrate striking and potentially important differences between the perceptions of female professionals and their supervisors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BAIRD, L. S.Self and superior rating of performance: As related to self-esteem and satisfaction with supervision . Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20, 291-300 .
2.
BARTOL, K. M.Male versus female organizational leaders: A review of comparative literature. Syracuse, New York: School of Management , 1977.
3.
BARTOL, K. M.The sex structuring of organizations: A search for possible causes . Academy of Management Review, 1978, 3, 805-815 .
4.
BARTOL, K. M. , & WORTMAN, M. S.Male versus female leaders: Effects on perceived leader behavior and satisfaction in a hospital . Personnel Psychology, 1975, 28, 533-547 .
5.
BEAM, H. H.Good writing: An underrated executive skill . Human Resource Management, 1981, 20, 2-7 .
6.
BIRDSALL, P.A comparative analysis of male and female managerial communication style in two organizations . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1980, 16, 183-196 .
7.
BROWN, S. M.Male versus female leaders: A comparison of empirical studies . Sex Roles, 1979, 5(5), 595-611 .
8.
CULLEN, J. B. , & PERREWE, P. L.Superiors' and subordinates' gender: Does it really matter?Psychological Reports, 1981, 48, 435-438 .
9.
DAVID, F. R.Women supervisors and effective delegation . Mid-South Business Journal, 1983, 3(2), 24-26 .
10.
DAY, D. R. , & STOGDILL, R. M.Leader behavior of male and female supervisors: A comparative study . Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 353-360 .
11.
DiSALVO, V. , LARSON, D. C. , & SELLER, W. J.Communication skills needed by persons in business organizations . Communication Education, 1976, 25, 269-275 .
12.
DONNELL, S. , & HALL, J.Men and women as managers: A significant case of no significant differences. The Woodlands, Texas: Telemetrics International , 1980.
13.
FELDMAN-SUMMERS, S. , & KIESLER, S. B.Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30(6), 846-855 .
14.
FRAKER, S.Why women aren't getting to the top . Fortune, April 1984, 40-45 .
15.
GOLDHABER, G. M.Organizational communication. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown , 1983.
16.
HARRIS, T. E. , & THOMLISON, T. D.Communication training needs in organizations: A competency/proficiency based study . Paper presented at ICA, San Francisco, 1984.
17.
HENEMANN, H. G.Comparison of self and superior ratings of managerial performance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 638-642 .
18.
HUNT, A.Management attitudes and practices toward women at work. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office , 1975.
19.
INSTITUTE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT/BRITISH INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT . Selecting managers: How British industry recruits, IPM Information Report No. 34, BIM Management Survey Report No. 49, Bournemouth, England: Archway Press, Ltd. , 1980.
20.
KNUDSON, A. D.Young management women: A new look. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 261 164, 1982.
21.
LARWOOD, L. , & LOCKHEED, M.Women as managers: Toward second generation research . Sex Roles, 1979, 5(5), 659-666 .
22.
MASSENGILL, D. , & DiMARCO, N.Sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics: A current replication . Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 561-570 .
23.
NAISBITT, J.Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books , 1982.
24.
OSBORN, R. N. , & VICARS, W. M.Sex stereotypes: An artifact in leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction analysis?Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 19, 439-449 .
25.
RENWICK, P.The effects of sex differences on the perception and management of superior- subordinate conflict . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977, 19, 403-415 .
26.
ROSE, G. L.Sex effects on effort attributions in managerial performance evaluation . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 21, 367-378 .
27.
SCHEIN, V. E.The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 60(3), 340-344 .
28.
SCHEIN, V. E.Sex role stereotyping, ability and performance: Prior research and new directions . Personnel Psychology, 1978, 31, 259-268 .
29.
SHOCKLEY, P. S.The effects of sex differences on the preference for utilization of conflict styles of managers in a work setting: An exploratory study . Public Personnel Management, 1981, 10(3), 289-295 .
30.
SHOCKLEY, P. S. , & STALEY, C.Women in management training programs: What they think about key issues . Public Personnel Management, 1980, 9(3), 214-224 .
31.
STALEY, C.Managerial women in mixed groups: Implications of recent research . Group and Organization Studies, 1984, 9(3), 316-332 .
32.
TERBORG, J. R.Women in management: A research review . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 647-664 .
33.
THORNTON, G. C.The relationship between supervisory and self-appraisals of executive performance . Personnel Psychology, 1968, 21, 441-456 .
