A model is developed that stipulates that task, roles, and reward distribution of organizational structure, perceived goal interdependence, patterns of behavior, and corporate values and interpersonal attitudes form causal loops, and mutually reinforce and sustain each other. Positive and negative goal interdependencies and independence have been identified and result in much different dynamics and outcomes. Studies overall indicate that positive interdependence promotes coordination and productivity. Research is needed to determine generalizability of these findings and to identify the purposes and. situations when negative interdependence and independence are appropriate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALLPORT, F. H.A structuronomic conception of behavior: Individual and collective. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 3-30.
2.
ARGYRIS, C.Intervention theory and method: A behavioral science view. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1970.
BARNARD, C.Organization and management. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1948.
5.
CAMPBELL, J. P., & PRITCHARD, R. D.Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976, pp. 63-130.
6.
CHENG, J. L.Interdependence and coordination in organizations: A role-system analysis. Academy of Management Review. 1983, 26, 156-162.
7.
DEUTSCH, M.A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 1949, 2, 129-152.
8.
DEUTSCH, M.Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 10) 1962, pp. 275-318.
9.
DEUTSCH, M.The resolution of conflict. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1973.
10.
DEUTSCH, M.Fifty years of conflict. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Retrospections on social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980, pp. 46-77.
11.
DEUTSCH, M.Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1985.
12.
DEUTSCH, M., & KRAUSS, R. M.The effect of threat upon interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 181-189.
13.
DILL, W. R., HILTON, T. L., & REITMAN, W. R.The new managers. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
14.
EMERSON, R. M.Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 31-41.
15.
FILLEY, A. C.Some normative issues in conflict management. California Management Review, 1978, 21, 61-68.
GEORGE, W. W.Task teams for rapid growth. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1977, 71-80.
18.
GRAEN, G.Role-making processes within complex organizations. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976, pp. 1201-1246.
19.
HACKMAN, J. R., & MORRIS, C. G.Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8), New York: Academic, 1975, pp. 45-99.
20.
HAYES, L.The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review: Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 628-648.
21.
JANZ, T., & TJOSVOLD, D.Costing effective and ineffective work relationship: A method and a first look. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 1985, 2, 43-51.
22.
JELINEK, M., SMIRCICH, L., & HIRSCH, P.Introduction: A code of many colors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 331-338.
23.
JOHNSON, D. W., & JOHNSON, R. T.Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 1974, 44, 213-240.
24.
JOHNSON, D. W., & JOHNSON, R. T.The socialization and achievement crises: Are cooperative learning experiences the solution? In L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual 3, Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1983, pp. 119-164.
25.
JOHNSON, D. W., MARUYAMA, G., JOHNSON, R. T., NELSON, D., & SKON, S.Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 89, 47-62.
26.
JOHNSON, D. W., JOHNSON, R. T., & MARUYAMA, G.Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 1983, 53, 5-54.
27.
KABANOFF, B., & O'BRIEN, G. E.Cooperation structure and the relationship of leader and member ability to group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 526-532.
28.
KATZ, D., & KAHN, R.The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1978.
29.
KELLEY, H. H., & STAHELSKI, A. J.Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 66-91.
30.
KERR, S., & SCHRIESHEIM, C. A.Consideration, initiating structure, and organizational criteria-An update of Korman's 1966 review. Personnel Psychology, 1974, 27, 555-456.
31.
KRAUSS, R. M.Structural and attitudinal factors in interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966, 42-55.
32.
LAWRENCE, P., & LORSCH, J.Organizations and environment. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School, 1967.
33.
LIKERT, R.The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
34.
OUCHI, W. G.Theory Z. Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1981.
35.
PETERS, T. J., & WATERMAN, R. H., Jr.In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row, 1982.
36.
PFEFFER, J.Power in organizations. Boston: Pittman, 1981.
37.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G. R.The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
38.
PRITCHARD, R. D., & KARASICK, B. W.The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 9, 126-146.
39.
PROVAN, K. G.Interorganizational cooperation and decision making autonomy. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 494-504.
40.
PRUITT, D. G., & SYNA, H.Successful problem solving. In D. Tjosvold & D. W. Johnson (Eds.), Productive conflict management: Perspectives for organizations. New York: Irvington, 1983, pp. 62-81.
41.
REVE, T., & STERN, L. W.Interorganizational relations in marketing channels. Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4, 405-416.
42.
ROOS, L. L., Jr. & STARKE, F. A.Organizational roles. In D. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981, pp. 290-308.
43.
ROSS, R. H., & LUSCH, R. F.Similarities between conflict and cooperation in the marketing channel. Journal of Business Research, 1982, 10, 237-250.
44.
RUBIN, J., & BROWN, B. R.The social psychology of bargaining and negotiations. New York: Academic, 1975.
45.
SAMPSON, E. E.Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 767-782.
46.
SCHUSTER, M.The Scanlon Plan: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1984, 20, 23-38.
47.
SLAVIN, R.Classroom reward structure: An analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47, 633-650.
STEWART, R.A model for understanding managerial jobs and behavior. Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7, 7-14.
50.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
51.
TJOSVOLD, D.Working together to get things done: Managing for organizational productivity. Boston: Lexington Books, 1986.
52.
TJOSVOLD, D.Effects of the approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 189-193.
53.
TJOSVOLD, D.Social face in conflict: A critique. International Journal of Group Tensions, 1983, 13, 49-64.
54.
TJOSVOLD, D.Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations, 1984, 37, 743-767. (a)
55.
TJOSVOLD, D.Effects of leader warmth and directiveness on subordinate performance on a subsequent task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69, 422-427. (b)
56.
TJOSVOLD, D.Goal interdependence approach to interdepartmental relations. Manuscript, Simon Fraser University, 1984. (c)
57.
TJOSVOLD, D.Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of Management, 1985, 11, 19-35. (a)
58.
TJOSVOLD, D.Power and social context in superior-subordinate interaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 35, 281-293. (b)
59.
TJOSVOLD, D.Dynamics and outcomes of goal interdependence in organizations. Journal of Psychology. In press. (a).
60.
TJOSVOLD, D.Testing goal linkage theory in organizations. Journal of Occupational Behaviour. In press. (b)
61.
TJOSVOLD, D., JOHNSON, D. W., & LERNER, J.The effects of affirmation and acceptance on incorporation of an opposing opinion in problem-solving. Journal of Social Psychology, 1981, 114, 103-110.
62.
TJOSVOLD, D., ANDREWS, I. R., & JONES, H.Cooperative and competitive relationships between superiors and subordinates, Human Relations, 1983, 36, 1111-1124.
63.
VAN BERKLOM, M., & TJOSVOLD, D.The effects of social context on engaging in controversy. Journal of Psychology, 1981, 107, 141-145.
64.
VAN DE VEN, A. H., DELBECQ, A. H., & KOENIG, R., Jr.Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 322-338.
WEICK, K.The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
67.
WILKINS, A. L., & OUCHI, W. G.Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationships between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 468-481.
