Several data sets collected on the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth (1978) model of turnover were re-analyzed with path analytic techniques. Data analyses revealed support for three general hypotheses proposed by Mobley et al. These were: (1) that age has an indirect effect on turnover through job satisfaction, (2) that job satisfaction has an indirect effect on turnover through withdrawal cognitions, and (3) that intention to quit is the immediate precursor of turnover. Although the data supported these hypotheses, inconsistencies were apparent in the data for many specific linkages proposed by Mobley et al. Possible reasons for these inconsistencies include: (1) diversity of samples studied, (2) the unmeasured variables problem, and (3) construct measurement problems. The use of a causal modeling approach developed by Joreskog & Sorborm (1978) is proposed as a possible solution to some of these problems in future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BILLINGS, R. S., & WROTEN, S. P.Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticisms and suggestions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 677-688.
2.
BRAYFIELD, A. H., & CROCKETT, W. H.Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52, 396-424.
3.
BRAYFIELD, A. H., & ROTHE, H. F.An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951, 35, 307-311.
4.
COVERDALE, S., & TERBORG, J. R.A reexamination of the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth model of turnover: A useful replication. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Detroit, August 1980.
5.
DREHER, G. F.The role of performance in the turnover process. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 137-147.
6.
GORDON, R. A.Issues in multiple regression. American Journal of Sociology, 1968, 73, 592-616.
7.
HIESE, D. R.Causal analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975.
8.
HOPPOCK, R.Job satisfaction. New York: Harper & Row, 1935.
9.
JAMES, L. R.The unmeasured variables problem in path analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 415-421.
10.
JORESKOG, K. G., & SORBORM, D.LISREL analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources, 1978.
11.
KERLINGER, F. N., & PEDHAZUR, E. J.Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1973.
12.
LOCKE, E. A.Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3, 157-189.
13.
LOCKE, E. A.The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.
14.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
15.
MARTIN, T. N., & HUNT, J. G.Social influence and the intent to leave: A path analytic process model. Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33, 505-528.
16.
MARUYAMA, G., & McGARVEY, B.Evaluating causal models: An application of maximumlikelihood analysis of structural equations. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 502-512.
17.
MICHAELS, C. E., & SPECTOR, P. E.Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 53-59.
18.
MILLER, H. E., KATERBERG, R., & HULIN, C. L.Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner, & Hollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 509-517.
19.
MOBLEY, W. H.intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 237-240.
20.
MOBLEY, W. H., HORNER, S. D., & HOLLINGSWORTH, A. T.An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 408-414.
21.
MOBLEY, W. H., GRIFFETH, R. W., HAND, H. H., & MEGLINO, B. M.Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 493-522.
22.
MOWDAY, R. T., KOBERG, C. S., & McARTHUR, A. W. The psychology of the withdrawal process: A cross-validation of Mobley's Intermediate Linkages Model of Turnover. Unpublished paper, Graduate School of Management, University of Oregon, January 1980.
23.
MOWDAY, R. T., KOBERG, C. S., & McARTHUR, A. W.The psychology of the withdrawal process: A cross-validational test of Mobley's Intermediate Linkages Model of Turnover in two samples. Academy of Management Journal, 1984, 27, 79-94.
24.
NADLER, D.Michigan organizational assessment package: Progress report II. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1975.
25.
PORTER, L. W., & STEERS, R. M.Organizational work and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 151-176.
26.
SMITH, P. C., KENDALL, L., & HULIN, C. L.The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
27.
SPECHT, D. A.On the evaluation of causal models. Social Science Research, 1975, 4, 113-133.
28.
SPENCER, D. G., STEERS, R. M., & MOWDAY, R. T.An empirical test of the inclusion of job search linkages into Mobley's model of turnover decision process. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1983, 56, 137-144.
29.
STEEL, R. P., & OVALLE, N. K., II.A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69, 673-686.
30.
STUMPF, S. A., & DAWLEY, P. K.Predicting voluntary and involuntary turnover using absenteeism and performance indices. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 148-163.
31.
TERBORG, J. R., & LEE, T. W.A predictive study of organizational turnover rates. Academy of Management Journal, 1984, 27, 793-810.
32.
VROOM, V. H.Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
