Election study panelsfrom Sweden (1979-1982) and the U.S. (1972-1976 and 1956-1960) were analyzed to see whether prior behavior (as implied by behaviorism) or recalled behavior (as implied by field theory) would better predict subsequent voting behavior. Although the results were mixed, data from each panel tended to support field theory somewhat more than behaviorism.
CREWE, I., BUDGE, I., & FAIRLIE, D.Party identification and beyond: Representation of voting and party competition. New York: Wiley, 1976.
3.
DOWNS, A.An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper, 1957.
4.
GRANBERG, D.An analysis of the House Judiciary Committee's recommendation to impeach Richard Nixon. Political Psychology, 1980, 2, 50-65.
5.
GRANBERG, D., & HOLMBERG, S.Subjective ideology in Sweden and the U.S.Research in Political Sociology, 1985, 2. In press.
6.
GRANBERG, D., & HOLMBERG, S.Political perception in Sweden and the U.S.: Analyses of issues with explicit alternatives. Western Political Quarterly, 1986, 39. In press.
7.
HIMMELWEIT, H., BIBERION, M., & STOCKDALE, J.Memory for past vote: Implications of a study of bias in recall. British Journal of Political Science, 1978, 8, 365-375.
8.
HOLMBERG, S."Riksdagen representerar Svenska folket. " Empiriska studier i representativ demokrati. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1974.
HOLMBERG, S.Valiare i forandring. Stockholm: Liberforlag, 1984.
11.
KATZ, R., NIEMI, R., & NEWMAN, R.Reconstructing past partisanship in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 1980, 10, 505-515.
12.
LEWIN, K.Defining "the field at a given time."Psychological Review, 1943, 50, 292-310.
13.
MUELLER, J.War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley, 1973.
14.
NIEMI, R., KATZ, R., & NEWMAN, D.Reconstructing past partisanship: The failure of the party identification recall questions. American Journal of Political Science, 1980, 24 (4, November), 633-651.
15.
SKINNER, B.About behaviorism. New York: Knopf, 1973.
16.
SMITH, T.Recalling attitudes: An analysis of retrospective questions on the 1982 GSS. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1984, 48 (Fall), 639-649.
17.
TRAUGOTT, M., & KATOSH, J.Response validity in surveys of voting behavior. Public Opin- ion Quarterly, 1979, 43 (Fall), 359-377.
18.
TRAUGOTT, M., & TUCKER, C.Strategies for predicting whether a citizen will vote and estimation of electoral outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1984, 48 (Spring), 330-343.
19.
WALDAHL, R., & AARDAL, B.Can we trust recall-data?Scandinavian Political Studies, 1982, 5, 101-116.
20.
WEIR, B.The distortion of voter recall. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 53-62.
