This paper reports the perceptions of the extent of technological change and its subjective impact among workers in five industrialized nations. We find that perceived technological change varies significantly among the surveyed publics, probably due to both the actual pace of technological change and sociocultural differences. Perceived change also varied between males and females and between blue and white-collar workers-both these variations being traceable to the structural differentiation of the labor market. The reported impacts of technological change are generally positive, with the important exception of Japanese workers, who report more job-related alienation. Here again, differences related to sex and type of job (blue vs. white collar) tend to reflect structural attributes of the occupational structure. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABDEL-HALIM, A. A.Effects of role stress job design-technology interaction on employee work satisfaction . Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24(2), 260-273 .
2.
ACKERMANN, W.Cultural values and social choice of technology . International Social Science Journal, 1981, 23(3), 447-465 .
3.
ADORNO, T. W.Kullurkritik und Gesellschaft. Prismen: Berlin and Frankfurt am Main , 1955.
4.
AIKEN, M. , & BACHARACH, S. B.Culture and organizational structure and process: A comparative study of local government administrative bureaucracies in the Lalloon and Flemish regions of Belgium. In D. Hickson & C. Lammers (Eds.), Organizations alike and unlike. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1978.
5.
AIKEN, M. , & HAGE, J.Organizational alienation: A comparative analysis . American Sociological Review, 1966, 31, 497-507 .
6.
ARCHIBALD, P. , OWEN, A. , & CARTRELL, J.Propertylessness and alienation: Reopening a “shut” case. In R. F. Geyer & D. Schweitzer (Eds.), Alienation: Problems of meaning, theory and method. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
7.
ARMER, M. , & ISAAC, L.Behavioral consequences of psychological modernity: Comparative evidence from three societies . Paper presented at the 9th World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, 1978.
8.
ARONOWITZ, S.False promises: The shaping of American working class consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1973.
9.
BACHARACH, S. B.Morphologie et processus: Une critique de la recherche intraorganisationnele contempora . Sociologie Du Travial, June1978, 153-173 .
10.
BACHARACH, S. B. , & AIKEN, M.Structural and process constraints on influence in organizations: A level specific analysis . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, 21, 623-642 .
11.
BACHARACH, S. B. , & AIKEN, M.Communication in administrative bureaucracies . Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20(3), 365-377 .
12.
BACHARACH, S. B. , & AIKEN, M.The impact of alienation, meaninglessness, and meritocracy on supervisor and subordinate satisfaction . Social Forces, 1979, 57, 853-870 .
13.
BLAUNER, R.Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1964.
14.
COOLEY, M.Architect or bee?London: Hand and Brain , 1980.
15.
COTGROVE, S.Alienation and automation . British Journal of Sociology, 1972, 23, 437-451 .
16.
DE VOS, G. A.Apprenticeship and paternalism. In Vogel, E. F. (Ed.), Modern Japanese organization and decision making. Berkeley, California: University of California Press , 1975.
17.
FAUNCE, W. A.Problems of an industrial society. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1968.
18.
FORM, W. H.Occupational and social integration of automobile workers in four countries: A comparative study . International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 1969, 10, 95-116 .
19.
FORM, W. H.The accommodation of rural and urban workers. The industrial discipline and urban living: A four-nation study . Rural Sociology, 1971, 36, 488-508 .
20.
FRIEDMAN, E. A. , & HAVIGHURST, R. J.Work and retirement. In S. Nosow & W. H. Form (Eds.), Man, work and society. New York: Basic Books , 1962.
21.
FROMM, E.Escape from freedom. New York: Holt , 1941.
22.
FULLAN, M.Industrial technology and worker integration in the organization . American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 1028-1039 .
23.
GROSSIN, W.Les attitudes des travailleurs à l'égard du changement technologique . Paper presented at the 9th World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala. Sweden, 1978.
24.
HORNEY, K.Neurosis and human growth. New York: Norton , 1950.
25.
KATZELL, R.Changing attitudes toward work. In C. Kerr & J. M. Rosow (Eds.), Work in America. New York: D. Van Nostrand , 1979.
26.
KIRSCH, B. A. , & LENGERMANN, J. J.An empirical test of Robert Blauner's ideas on alienation in work as applied to different type jobs in a white-collar setting . Sociology and Social Research, 1971, 56, 180-194 .
27.
KOHN, M. L.Occupational structure and alienation . American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 82, 111-130 .
28.
KOHN, M. L.Class and class conformity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1977.
29.
KORNHAUSER, A.Mental health of the industrial worker: A Detroit study. New York: Wiley , 1965.
30.
MARCUSE, H.One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press , 1964.
31.
MARX, K.Early writings. London: C. A. Watts , 1963 (translated and edited by T. B. Bottomore).
32.
MEISSNER, M.Technology and the worker: Technical demands and social processes in industry. San Francisco: Chandler , 1969.
33.
MORSE, N. C. , & WEISS, R. S.The function and meaning of work and the job . American Sociological Review, 1955, 20, 191-198 .
34.
MOTTAZ, C.Some determinants of work-alienation . The Sociological Quarterly, 1981, 22(4), 515-529 .
35.
OUCHI, W. G.Theory Z. How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. New York: Avon Books , 1982.
36.
PASCALE, R. T. , & ATHOS, A. G.The art of Japanese management. New York: Warner Books , 1982.
37.
PERROW, C. A.A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations . American Sociological Review, 1969, 32, 194-208 .
38.
REIMANIS, G.“Alienation and powerlessness in four cultures . Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, 1978.
ROTHWELL, R. , & ZEGFELD, W.Technology and employment. London: Frances Pinter , 1979.
41.
SCHWEITZER, D.Alienation theory and research: Trends, issues and priorities . International Social Science Journal, 1981, 33(3), 523-556 .
42.
SEEMAN, M.On the meaning of alienation . American Sociological Review, 1959, 24, 783-791 .
43.
SEEMAN, M.Alienation and engagement. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change. New York: Russell Sage , 1972.
44.
SEEMAN, M.Some real and imaginary consequences of social mobility: A French-American comparison . American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82, 757-782 .
45.
SEMYONOV, M.The social context of women's labor force participation: A comparative analysis . American Journal of Sociology, 1980, 86, 534-550 .
46.
SEMYONOV, M. , & SCOTT, R. I.Industrial shifts, female employment, and occupational differentiation: A dynamic model for American cities, 1960-1970 . Demography, 1983, 20(2), 163-176 .
47.
SEYBOLT, J. W. , & GRUENFELD, L.The discriminant validity of work alienation and work satisfaction measures . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1976, 49, 193-202 .
48.
SHEPARD, J. M.Functional specialization and work attitudes . Industrial Relations, 1969, 8, 185-194 .
49.
SHEPARD, J. M.Functional specialization, alienation, and job satisfaction . Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1970,, 23, 207-219 .
50.
SHEPARD, J. M.Automation and alienation: A study of office and factory workers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press , 1971.
51.
SHEPARD, J. M.Technology, division of labor, and alienation . Pacific Sociological Review, 1973, 16, 61-88 .
52.
SHEPARD, J. M.Technology, alienation, and job satisfaction . American Review of Sociology, 1977, 3, 1-21 .
53.
SHEPARD, J. M. , & KIM, D.Alienation among factory workers in the U.S. and Korea: A comparative study . Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, 1978.
54.
SHEPARD, J. M. , & PANKO, T. R.Alienation: A discrepancy approach . The Sociological Quarterly, 1974, 15, 253-263 .
55.
SHEPARD, J. M. , KIM, D. I. , & HOUGLAND, J. G., Jr.Effects of technology in industralized and industralizing societies . Sociology of Work and Occupations, 1979, 6(4), 457-481 .
56.
SHEPPARD, H. L. , & HERRICK, N. Q.Where have all the robots gone? Workers dissatisfaction in the '70's. New York: Free Press , 1972.
57.
SIMMEL, G.Exkurs über den Fremden. In G. Simmel, Sociology. Munich and Leipzig: Dunker and Humbolt , 1923.
58.
SIMPSON, M. E.Social mobility, normlessness and powerlessness in two cultural contexts . American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 1002-1013 .
59.
SMELSER, N. J.The sociology of economic life. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1976.
60.
TIME MAGAZINE. An industrial nirvana . September 8, 1980.
61.
TOURAINE, A.Production de la société. Paris: Editions du Seuil , 1973.
62.
TUDOR, B.A specification of relationships between job complexity and powerlessness . American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 596-604 .
63.
WELTZ, F. , & SCHMIDT, G.Introduction of new technologies, employment policies and industrial relations. London: Anglo-German Foundation , 1976.
64.
WI LENSKY, H. L.Work as a social problem. In H. S. Becker (Ed.), Social problems: A modern approach. New York: John Wiley , 1966.
65.
ZIMPEL, L. (Ed.), Man against work. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdams , 1974.
