The central argument of this paper is that the popular success of crowd psychology is in part due to its correspondence with the perspective of outgroup members. This is supported by a comparative analysis of traditional crowd psychology and lay accounts of crowd events drawn from street disturbances in St. Pauls, Bristol, in 1980. Five basic types of error are identified in crowd psychology past and present. These are: (1) the abstraction of crowd episodes from their intergroup conflicts, (2) the failure to deal with underlying dynamic processes, (3) exaggeration of the anonymity of crowd members, (4) failure to understand the motives of crowd members, and (5) an overwhelming emphasis on the negativity of crowd events. Analysis of accounts of the St. Pauls disturbance reveals the centrality of these forms of error in outgroup members' versions of events. In contrast, crowd members tended to draw upon very different accounts which stress the meaningfulness of crowd action, solidarity, and positive emotional feelings. The implication of these findings for crowd psychology, the study of everyday accounts, and the genesis of ideological explanations is discussed.
ANTAKI, C. (Ed.). The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior. London: Academic Press , 1982.
3.
AVENI, A. F.The not-so-lonely crowd: Friendship groups in collective behavior . Sociometry, 1977, 40, 95-99 .
4.
BARROWS, S.Distorting mirrors. New Haven: Yale University Press , 1981.
5.
BERK, R. A.A gaming approach to crowd behaviour . American Sociological Review, 1974, 39, 355-373 .
6.
BERKOWITZ, L.Frustrations, comparisons, and other sources of emotional arousal as contributions to social unrest . Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 77-91 .
BRUNT, P. A.The roman mob . Past and Present, 1966, 35, 3-27 .
9.
DAVIS, N. Z.The rites of violence: Religious riot in sixteenth France . Past and Present, 1978, 59, 51-91 .
10.
DOISE, W.L'explication en psychologie sociale. Paris: PUF , 1982.
11.
EMLER, N. , RENWICK, S. , & MALONE, B.The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, 1073-1080 .
ESTEBE, J.Tocsin pour un massacre. La saison de Saint-Berthelemy. Paris: Flammarion , 1968.
14.
FARR, R. M. , & MOSCOVICI, S. (Eds.), Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1984.
15.
FEAGIN, J. R. , & HAHN, M.Ghetto revolts. New York: Macmillan .
16.
FURNHAM, A.Explanations for unemployment in Britain . European Journal of Social Psychology, 1982, 12, 335-352 .
17.
GEARY, D.European labour protest 1948-1939. London: Croom Helm , 1981.
18.
GEIGER, R. L.Democracy and the crowd: The social history of an idea in France and Italy, 1890-1914 . Societas, 1977, 7, 47-71 .
19.
HANSARD PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES/HOUSE OF COMMONS. 1981, 72, HMSO.
20.
HEWSTONE, M. , & JASPERS, J.Intergroup relations and attribution processes. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss; Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. , 1982.
21.
ISRAEL, J. , & TAJFEL, H. (Eds.). The context of social psychology. London: Academic Press , 1972.
22.
JACOBOWSKI, F.Ideology and superstructure in historical materialism. London: Alison and Busby , 1936 (translated 1976).
23.
LARRAIN, J.On the character of ideology: Marx and the present debate in Britain . Theory, Culture and Society, 1982, 1, 5-22 .
24.
LE BON, G. La psychologie politique et la defense sociale. Paris: Flammarion, 1910.
25.
LE BON, G.The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Ernest Benn , 1985 (translated 1947).
26.
LITTOON, I. & POTTER, J.Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a “riot . European Journal of Social Psychology. Forthcoming.
27.
LUBEK, I.A brief psychological analysis of research on aggression in social psychology. In A. P. Buss , (Ed.), Psychology in social context. New York: Irvington , 1979.
28.
MARX, G. T.Civil disorder and the agents of social control . Journal Qf Social issues, 1970, 26, 19-57 .
29.
MARX, K.Preface to a contribution to the critique of political economyPeking: Foreign Languages Press , 1857 (translated 1976).
30.
MCDOUGALL, W.Introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen , 1908.
31.
MCDOUGALL, W.The group mind (2nd ed.), London: Cambridge U1nisersity Press , 1927.
32.
MOSCOVICI, S.Society and theory in social psychology. In J. Israel & H. Tejfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology. London: Academic Press , 1972.
33.
MOSCOVICI, S.Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press , 1976.
34.
MOSCOVICI, S.On social representation. In J. Forgas , (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding. London: Academic Press , 1981.
35.
NIUGNY, G.The power of minorities. London Academic Press , 1982.
36.
NYE, R. A.The origins of crowd psychology. London: Sage , 1975.
37.
POTTER, J. & MCKINLAY, A.Linguistic repertoires, representations and the organization of ordinary explanations. University of St Andrews , 1984. Submitted,
38.
POTTER, J. , & MULKAY, M.`Scientists' interview talk: Interview as a technique for revealing participants' interpretative practices. In M. Brenner , J. Brown , & D. Canter (Eds.), The research interview. Uses and approaches. London: Academic Press . In Press.
39.
POTTER, J. , & LITTON, I.Some problems underlying the theory of social representations . British Journal of Social Psychology. Forthcoming.
40.
POTTER, J. , STRINGER, P., & WIETHERELL, M.Social text and contactLondon. Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1984.
41.
RIDDY, W. M.The textile trade and the language of the crowd at Rouen . Past and Present, 1977, 74, 62-89 .
42.
REICHER, S. The determination of collective behavior. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 1983.
43.
REICIHERI S.The determination of collective behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. CambridgeCambridge University Press; Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme , 1982.
44.
REICHER, S.St. Pauls: A study in the limits of crowd behavior . European Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 14, 1-21 .
45.
REICLHER, S.The crowd. A study in the social determination of behavior. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press . Forthcoming.
46.
ROSS, E.AN Social Psychology. An outline and source book. New York. MacMillan , 1908.
47.
SEMIN, S. R. & MANSTEAD, A. S. R.The accountability of conduct: A social psychiological analysis. London: Academic Press , 1983.
48.
SIGHELE, S.La foule criminelle. Essai de psychologie collective. Paris: Felix Alcan , 1892.
49.
SMITH, D.Tonypandy 1910: Definitions of community . Past and Present, 1980, 87, 158-184 .
50.
STEINER, I. D.Whatever happened to the group in social psychology?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974, 10, 94-108 .
51.
TAJFEL, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relationsLondon: Academic Press , 1978.
TAYIX OR, D. M. & JAGGI, V.Ethnocentrism and causal attribution it a South Indian context . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1974, 5, 102-171 .
54.
THOMPSON, E. P.The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenh century . Past and Present, 1971, 50, 76-136 .
55.
TILLY, C. , TILLY, L. , & TILLY, R.The rebellious century 1830-1930. London. Dent , 1975
56.
TREW, T.What the papers say Linguistic variation and ideological difference. In R, Fowler , B. Hodge , G. Kress , & T. Trew (Eds.), Language and control. London Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1979, (a)
57.
TREW, T.Theory and ideology at work. In R. Fowler , B. Hodge , G. Kress , & T. Trew (Eds.), Language and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1979. (b)
58.
TURNER, J.Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Maison des Sciences de I' Homme , 1982.
59.
TURNER, J. C. , & GILES, H. (Eds.). Intergroup behavior. Oxford: Blackwell , 1981.
60.
TURNER, R. H. , & KILLIAN, L.Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall , 1972.
