A Comparison of the Quality of Work Experience in Government and Private Organizations

Abstract

A total of 5979 employees from a number of Australian government and private sector organizations participated in a survey measuring the quality of their work experience. This article examines the differences found between government and private sector employees' ratings of their work experience. The results of this study indicate that the government employees rate the quality of their work experience significantly below the level of their private sector counterparts. The most significant difference in the ratings was between high status government vs. high status private employees, with high status private employees rating their work experience well above the equivalent government group. An association was also found between the type of organization and employees' motivation for work. People working in public organizations were motivated more by factors such as providing a service or product that helps other people or self-development/self-fulfillment than private sector employees. Those in private organizations were motivated more by extrinsic factors such as money in order to obtain an enjoyable and pleasurable life. High status government employees were more intrinsically oriented than all other occupational groups. The lower rating of government employees' work experience may be related to the lack of fulfilling intrinsic factors in their work situations. The results of this study are similar to the results of previous studies which have compared work satisfaction in government vs. private organizations. The results suggest the need for well planned and coordinated organizational development programs in government departments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ALDERFER, C. Organization development . Annual Review of Psychology, 1977, 28.

CACIOPPE, R. L. The quality of working life . A study of work attitudes in Australian organisations presented at the Management Educator's Conference, Melbourne, 1980.

CACIOPPE, R. L. A theory of consciousness applied to the quality of work experience, managerial type and stress in organizations. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Macquarie University, 1984.

CASS, M. , & HAWKER, M. Information about government personnel reflections on a survey source . Politics, May 1978, XIII(l), 175-181 .

CHERNS, A. Perspectives on the quality of working life . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1975, 48.

CONGALTON, A. A. Status and prestige in Australia, London: Cheshire , 1969.

FRANKEL, S. & MANNERS, L. Australian managers: A comparative analysis of their industrial and social orientations, Sydney: University of N.S.W. , 1980.

GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. Civil Service and managing work: Some unintended consequences. In R. Golembiewski , F. Gibson , & G. Miller (Eds.), Managerial behaviour and organization demands. Peacock, 290-313.

Hill, M. The sociology of public administration. New York: Crane, Russack & Company , 1975.

10.

McCLELLAND, D. The Archiving Society. The Free Press , 1961.

11.

NEWSTROM, J. W. , REIF, W. E. , & MONCZKA, R. M. Motivating the public employee: Fact vs. fiction . Public Personnel Management, Jan-Feb. 1976.

12.

SMITH, M. P. , & NOCK, S. L. Social class and the quality of work life in public and private organisations . Journal of Social Issues, 1980, 36(4).

13.

SPANN, R. N. Government Administration in Australia. Sydney: George Allen and Unwin , 1979.

14.

TAYLOR, J. C. Job satisfaction and the quality of working life: A reassessment . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1977, 50.

15.

WILENSKI, P. Directions for change. New South Wales: Government Printer , 1977.

16.

WILENSKI, P. Unfinished agenda. New South Wales: Government Printer , 1982.