The relative plausibilities of three theories concerning the relationship between sociopolitical ideology and certain personality variables were examined using 783 Swedish high school students: authoritarian personality theory, extremism theory, and context theory. The three theories were compared by examining degree of information search and interest in politics as a function of sociopolitical ideology and ideological homogeneity as a function of parental educational level. The main results showed that: (1) The relationships between degree of information search and political interest on the one hand, and sociopolitical ideology on the other, were primarily curvilinear indicating greater interest in politics and greater information search for both “left” and “right extremists” as compared to moderates on a number of ideological dimensions. (2) Subjects with well-educated parents were more ideologically heterogeneous than subjects with poorly educated parents. These differences were more marked for males than for females. The results were most consistent with context theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADORNO, T.FRENKEL-BRUNSWICK, E. , LEVINSON, D. , & SANFORD, N.The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper , 1950.
2.
CAPLAN, N.The new ghetto man: A review of recent empirical studies . Journal of Social Issues, 1970, 26, 59-73 .
3.
CHAFFEE, S. H.et al. , Mass communication in political socialization. In S. A. Renshon (Ed.), Handbook of political socialization: Theory and research. New York: Free Press , 1977.
4.
CITRIN, J. , McCLOSKY, H. , SHANKS, J. M. , & SNIDERMAN, P. M.Personal and political sources of political alienation . British Journal of Political Science, 1975, 5, 1-31 .
5.
CONVERSE, P. E.The nature of belief, systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press , 1964, 206-261.
6.
DIZARD, J. E.Black ideology, social class, and Black power . Psychiatry, 1970, 33, 195-207 .
7.
EISINGER, P. K.The conditions of protest, behavior in American cities . American Political Science Review, 1973, 67, 11-28 .
8.
EKEHAMMAR, B. , & SIDANIUS, J.Sex differences in sociopolitical attitudes: A replication and extension . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1982, 21, 249-258 .
9.
EYSENCK, H. J. , & COULTER, T. T.The personality and attitudes of working class British communists and fascists . Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 87, 59-73 .
10.
FOGELSON, R. M.Violence as protest: A study of riots and ghettos. New York: Doubleday , 1971.
11.
GORSUCH, R. L.Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders , 1974.
12.
GREENSTEIN, F. I.Sex-related political differences in childhood , Journal of Politics, 1961, 23, 353-371 .
13.
HAGTVET, B.The theory of mass society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic: A re-examination. In S. U. Larsen , B. Hagtvet , & J. M. Myklebust (Eds.), Who Were the Fascists: Social roots of European fascism. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget , 1980, 66-117.
HYMAN, H. H.Political socialization: A study in the psychology of political behavior. New York: Free Press , 1959.
16.
KAASE, M.Dynamics of dissatisfaction and protest potential in Germany . Paper delivered at the American Political Science Association Meeting, San Francisco, 1975.
17.
KENNISTON, K.The sources of student dissent . Journal of Social Issues, 196723, 108-135 .
18.
KERLINGER, F. N. , & PEDAZUR, E. J.Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston , 1973.
19.
KUBOTA, A.Protest and the Japanese political system . Journal of Asian and African Studies, 1975, 10, 165-175 .
20.
LEVY, S. G.The psychology of political activity . Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 1969, 391, 83-96 .
21.
MASOTTI, L. H. , & BOWEN, D. R.Riots and rebellions. Beverly Hills, California: Sage , 1968.
22.
MILBRATH, L. W. , & GOEL, M. L.Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics?Chicago: Rand McNally , 1977.
23.
MILLER, A. H.Political issues and trust in government: 1954-1970 . American Political Science Review, 1974, 68, 951-1001 .
24.
ROKEACH, M.Political and religious dogmatism: An alternative to the authoritarian personality . Psychological Monographs, 1956, 70(18), No. 425.
25.
SEARS, D. O.Political behavior. In G. Lindzay & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 5). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley , 1969, 315-458.
26.
SHILS, E. A.Authoritarianism: “Right and left”. In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of the authoritarian personality: Continuities in social research. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press , 1954, 24-49.
27.
SIDANIUS, J.Cognitive functioning and socio-political ideology. Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm, No. 443 , 1975.
28.
SIDANIUS, J.Studies in political-psychology: Theoretical and empirical speculations toward the derivation of theory. Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm, Supplement No. 34, 1976.
29.
SIDANIUS, J.Further tests of a Swedish scale of conservatism. Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm, No. 499, 1977.
30.
SIDANIUS, J.Intolerance of ambiguity and socio-political ideology: A multidimensional analysis . European Journal of Social Psychology, 1978, 8, 215-235 (a).
31.
SIDANIUS, J.Cognitive functioning and socio-political ideology: An exploratory study . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 46, 415-530 (b).
32.
SIDANIUS, J. , & EKEHAMMAR, B.Cognitive functioning and socio-political ideology: A multidimensional and individualized analysis . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1976, 17, 205-216 .
33.
SIDANIUS, J. , & EKEHAMMAR, B.Cognitive differentiation and socio-political ideology: An exploratory study . Psychological Reports, 1977, 41, 203-211 .
34.
SIDANIUS, J. , & EKEHAMMAR, B.Sex-related differences in socio-political ideology . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1980, 21, 17-26 .
35.
SIDANIUS, J. , EKEHAMMAR, B. , & ROSS, M.Comparisons of socio-political attitudes between two democratic societies . International Journal of Psychology, 1979, 14, 225-240 .
36.
SIDANIUS, J. , EKEHAMMAR, B. , & LUKOWSKY, J.Social status and socio-political ideology in Sweden . Youth and Society, 1983, 14, 395-415 .
37.
SMITHERS, A. G. , & LOBLEY, D. M.The relationship between dogmatism and radicalism/conservatism. In H. J. Eysenck & G. D. Wilson (Eds.), The Psychological basis of ideology. Lancaster, England: MTP Press , 1978, 263-272.
38.
STACEY, B.Political socialization in Western society: An analysis from life-span perspective. London: Arnold , 1978.
39.
STONE, W. F.The myth of left-wing authoritarianism . Political Psychology, 1980, 2, 3-19 .
40.
STREUFERT, S. , & STREUFERT, S. C.Behavior in the complex environment. New York: Wiley , 1978.
41.
TAYLOR, I. A.Similarities in the structure of extreme social attitudes . Psychological Monographs, 1960, 74, 1-36 .
42.
TOMLINSON, T. M.Ideological foundations for Negro action: A comparative analysis of militant and non-militant views of the Los Angeles riot . Journal of Social Issues, 1970, 26, 93-119 .
43.
TUCKMAN, B. W.Personality structure, group composition and group functioning . Sociometry, 1964, 27, 469-487 .
44.
TYLER, L. E.The psychology of human differences (3rd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts , 1965.
