Network analysis is applied to implementation problems in a case study of the Century Freeway Project in Los Angeles. The analysis shows the impact that network ties have on the ability of managers to implement a complex public project. The concept of “multilateral brokerage role”, is introduced to explain how managers in this setting are able to adapt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDRICH, H. , & WHETTEN, D. A.Organization sets, Action sets, and networks: Making the most of simplicity. In P. Nystrum & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1). London: Oxford University Press , 1981.
2.
BENSON, K.The Interorganizational network as a political economy . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 229-248 .
3.
DEXTER, L. A.Elite And specialized interviewing. Evanston: Northwestern University Press , 1970.
4.
EVAN, W. M.The organization-set: Toward a theory of interorganizational relations. In J. D. Thompson (Ed.), Approaches to organizational design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press , 1966.
5.
FRIEND, J.Network concepts in interorganizational analysis . Paper presented for International Conference on Analysis of Intergovernmental and Interorganizational Arrangements in Public Administration, University of Indiana, Bloomington, May 11, 1981.
6.
GAGE, R. W.Federal regional councils: Networking organizations for policy management in the intergovernmental system . Paper prepared for the National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration, New York, April, 1983:
7.
GRICAR, B. G.Fostering collaboration among organizations. In H. Meltzer (Ed.), Making organizations humane and productive: A handbook for practitioners. New York: John Wiley & Sons , 1981.
8.
GRICAR, B. G. , & BROWN, L. D.Conflict, power, and organization in a changing community . Human Relations, 1981, 34(10), 877-893 .
9.
HJERN, B. , & PORTER, D. O.Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980.
10.
KNOKE, D. , & KUKLINSKI, J. H.Network analysis. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-028, Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications , 1982.
11.
MANDELL, M. Implementing complex projects through interorganizational networks: A case study of the century freeway project in Los Angeles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1981.
12.
McCANN, J. E.Design parameters for social problem solving intervention. Unpublished manuscript, Oregon State University and University of Pennsylvania , April, 1981.
13.
NEGANDHI, A. R. (Ed.). Organization theory in an interorganizational perspective. Kent: Comparative Administration Research Institute, Kent State University , 1971.
14.
PENNINGS, J.Strategically interdependent organizations. In P. Nystrum & H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1). London: Oxford University Press , 1981.
15.
PFEFFER, J. , & SALANCIK, G. R.The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row , 1978.
16.
PORTER, D. O. , & WARNER, D. C.Organizations and implementation structures. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas, Austin , June, 1979.
17.
PROVAN, K. G.Interorganizational linkages and influence over decision making . Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25(2), 443-451 .
18.
RAELIN, J. A.A model of interorganizational development . Paper presented at AIDS, November 20, 1981.
19.
STERN, R. N.The development of an interorganizational control network: The case of intercollegiate athletics . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24(2), 242-266 .
20.
TRIST, E.Referent organizations and the development of initerorganizational domains . A distinguished lecture to the Academy of Management (Organization and Management Theory Division), 39th Annual Convention, Atlanta, August 9, 1979.
21.
WARREN, R. L.The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, 12(3), 396-419 .
