It is argued that a synthesis of social exchange theory and symbolic interactionism may provide a useful framework for understanding and predicting the development of intimate relationships. A study was conducted to test a central proposition from this synthetic, “symbolic exchange” framework. Evidence was found to support predictions that couples in progressed relationships will show greater symbolic interdependence and that symbolic inter dependence associates positively with relationship commitment and with relationship satisfaction. Findings from the study provided support for the symbolic exchange framework against competing predictions from filter theories of relationship development and provide justification for a program of research investigating the symbolic exchange model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALEXANDER, R.Natural selection and social exchange. In R. Burgess and T. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic Press , 1979, pp. 197-221.
2.
BERGER, P. , & KELLNER, H.Marriage and the construction of reality: An exercise in the microsociology of knowledge . Diogenese, 1964, 46, 1-24 .
3.
BOLTON, C.Mate selection as the development of a relationship . Marriage and Family Living, 1961, 23, 234-240 .
4.
BYRNE, D. , & BLAYLOCK, B.Similarity and assumed similarity between husbands and wives . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 636-640 .
5.
CENTERS, R.Attitude similarity-dissimilarity as a correlate of heterosexual attraction and love . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37, 305-312 .
6.
CORSINI, R.Understanding and similarity in marriage . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 52, 327-332 .
7.
DENZIN, N.Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology: A proposed synthesis . American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 922-934 .
8.
DENZIN, N.Rules of conduct and the study of deviant behavior: Some notes on the social relationship. In G. McCall , M. McCall , N. Denzin , G. Suttles , & S. Kurth (Eds.), Social relationships. Chicago: Aldine , 1970.
9.
DUCK, S.Personal relationships and personal constructs: A study of friendship formation. New York: John-Wiley , 1973.
10.
FINE, G.Small groups and culture creation: The idioculture of little league baseball teams . American Sociological Review, 1979, 44, 735-745 .
11.
GOTTMAN, J. , NOTARIUS, C. , MARKMAN, H. , BANK, S. , YOPPI, B. , & RUBIN, M.Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 14-23 .
GOULDNER, A.The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement . American Sociological Review, 1960, 25, 161-179 .
14.
HAAS, D. , & DESERAN, F.Trust and symbolic exchange . Social Psychology Quarterly, 1981, 44, 3-13 .
15.
HOLLINGSHEAD, A. , & REDLICH, F.Social class and mental illness. New York: John Wiley , 1958.
16.
HOMANS, G.Social Behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World , 1974.
17.
KATZ, M.Agreement on connotative meaning in marriage . Family Process, 1965, 4, 64-74 .
18.
KELLEY H. , & THIBAUT, J.Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley , 1978.
19.
KERCKHOFF, A. , & DAVIS, K.Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection . American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 295-303 .
20.
LEDERER, W. , AND JACKSON, D.The mirages of marriage. New York: W. W. Norton , 1968.
21.
LEVINGER, G.A social exchange view on the dissolution of pair relationships. In R. Burgess and T. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic Press , 1979, pp. 169-193..
22.
LEVINGER, G. , & BREEDLOVE, J.Interpersonal attraction and agreement: A study of marriage partners . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 367-372 .
23.
LEVINGER, G. , SENN, D. , & JORGENSEN, B.Progress toward permanence in courtship: A test of the Kerckhoff-Davis hypothesis . Sociometry, 1970, 33, 427-443 .
24.
LEWIS, R.A developmental framework for the analysis of premarital dyadic formation . Family Process, 1972, 11, 17-48 .
25.
LEWIS, R.The dyadic formation inventory: An instrument for measuring heterosexual couple development . The International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 1973, 2, 207-216 .
26.
LOCKE, H. , & WALLACE, K.Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity . Marriage and Family Living, 1959, 21, 251-255 .
27.
McCALL, G. , & SIMONS, J.Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life (Revised ed.). New York: The Free Press , 1978.
28.
McCALL, G. , McCALL, M. , DENZIN, N. , SUTTLES, D. , & KURTH, S.Social relationships. Chicago: Aldine , 1970.
29.
MELTZER, B. , PETRAS, J. , AND REYNOLDS, L.Symbolic interactionism: Genesis, varieties and criticism. Boston: Routledge and Kegan-Paul , 1975.
30.
MURSTEIN, B.Stimulus-Value-Role: A theory of marital choice . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1970, 32, 465-481 .
31.
MURSTEIN, B.A thematic test and the Rorschach in predicting marital choice . Journal of Personality Assessment, 1972, 36, 213-217 .
32.
MURSTEIN, B.Who will marry whom? Theories and research in marital choice. New York: Springer , 1976.
33.
MURSTEIN, B. , CERRETO, M. , & MAcDONALD, M.A theory and investigation of the effect of exchange-orientation on marriage and friendship . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977, 39, 543-548 .
34.
NAVRON, L.Communication and adjustment in marriage . Family Process, 1967, 6, 173-184 .
35.
NEWCOMB, T.The acquaintance process. New York: Holt , 1961.
36.
NEWCOMB, T. , & SVEHLA, G.Intra-family relationships in attitude . Sociometry, 1937, I, 180-205 .
37.
RAPOPORT, R.The transition from engagement to marriage . Acta Sociologica, 1964, 8, 36-55 .
38.
RYDER, R. , KAFKA, J. , & OLSON, D.Separating and joining influences in courtship and early marriage . American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1971, 41, 450-464 .
39.
SAFILIOS-ROTHSCHILD, C.Love, sex, and sex roles. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall , 1977.
40.
SINGLEMAN, P.Exchange as symbolic interaction: Convergences between two theoretical perspectives . American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 414-424 .
41.
STEPHEN, T. , & MARKMAN, H.Assessing the development of relationships: A new measure . Family Process, 1983, 22, 15-25 .
