Previous research has shown that interviewers' final decisions were related to: [a] the degree of similarity between the interviewers' perception of the ideal employee and the applicant, and [b] the degree of similarity between the interviewers' self-perception and the applicant. The purpose of the present field study was to determine which variable (similarity to the ideal or similarity to the self) was more highly related to the interviewers' final decision. Thirty-seven applicants were interviewed by five interviewers in structured board interviews. The results indicated that final decisions were related more to the ideal-applicant match than to the self-applicant match. The implications of these results for interviewer training and future research were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARKKELIN, D. , OAKLEY, T. , & MYNATT, C.Effects of controllable versus uncontrollable factors on responsibility attributions: A single-subject approach . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 110-115 .
2.
ARVEY, R. D.Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects . Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 736-765 .
3.
ARVEY, R. D. , & CAMPION, J. E.The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research . Personnel Psychology, 1982, 35, 281-322 .
4.
BASKETT, G. D.Interview decisions determined by competency and attitude similarity . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 343-345 .
5.
BERNSTEIN, V. , HAKEL, M. D. , HARLAN, A.The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 266-268 .
6.
BYRNE, D.Attitudes and attraction. In L. Berkowitz (ED.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press , 1969.
7.
BYRNE, D.The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press , 1971.
8.
COHEN, J. , & COHEN, P.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1975.
9.
CRONBACH, L. J. , & GLESER, G. C.Assessing similarity between profiles . Psychological Bulletin, 1953, 50, 456-473 .
10.
DARLINGTON, R. B.Multiple regression in psychological research and practice . Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 161-182 .
11.
FRANK, L. L. , & HACKMAN, J. R.Effects of interviewer-interviewee similarity on interviewer objectivity in college admissions interviews . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 356-360 .
12.
GRAEN, G. , & SCHIEMANN, W.Leader-member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 206-212 .
13.
GRIFFITT, W. , & JACKSON, T.Influence of information about ability and nonability on personnel selection decisions . Psychological Reports, 1970, 27, 959-962 .
14.
HAKEL, M. D.Normative personality factors recovered from ratings of personality descriptors: The beholder's eye . Personnel Psychology, 1974, 27, 409-421 .
15.
HAKEL, M. D. , HOLLMANN, T. D. , & DUNNETTE, M. -D.Accuracy of interviewers, certified public accountants, and students in identifying the interests of accountants . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1970, 54, 115-119 .
16.
HAMMER, T. H. , & DACHLER, H. P.A test of some assumptions underlying the path goal model of supervision: Some suggested conceptual modifications . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 14, 60-75 .
17.
HOLLANDSWORTH, J. G. , KAZELSKIS, R. , STEVENS, J. , & DRESSEL, M. E.Relative contributions of verbal, articulative, and nonverbal communication to employment decisions in the job interview setting . Personnel Psychology, 1979, 32, 359-367 .
18.
HOTELLING, H.The selection of variates for use in prediction with some comments on the general problem of nuisance parameters . Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1940, 11, 271-283 .
19.
IMADA, A. S. , FLETCHER, C. , & DALESSIO, A.Individual correlates of an occupational stereotype: A re-examination of the stereotype of accountants . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 436-439 .
20.
KLIMOSKI, R. J. , & LONDON, M.Role of the rater in performance appraisals . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 445-451 .
21.
MAYFIELD, E. C.The selection interview-A re-evaluation of published research . Personnel Psychology, 1964, 17, 239-260 .
22.
PETERS, L. H. , TERBORG, J. R.The effects of temporal placement of unfavorable information and of attitude similarity on personnel selection decisions . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 179-293 .
23.
POWELL, G. N. , & BUTTERFIELD, D. A.The “good manager': Masculine or androgynous?Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 395-403 .
24.
RAND, T. M. , & WEXLEY, K. N.Demonstration of the effect, “similar to me,” in simulated employment interviews . Psychological Reports, 1975, 36, 535-544 .
25.
RODIN, M. J.The informativeness of trait descriptions . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 21, 341-344 .
26.
SCHEIN, V. E.The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 95-100 .
27.
SCHEIN, V. E.Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 340-344 .
28.
SCHMITT, N.Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview . Personnel Psychology, 1976, 29, 79-101 .
29.
SYDIAHA, D.Interviewer consistency in the use of empathic models in personnel selection . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1962, 46, 344-349 .
30.
THORNTON, G. C., III.Psychometric properties of self-appraisals . Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33, 263-272 .
31.
WALKER, H. M. , & LEV, J.Statistical inference. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston , 1953.
32.
WEBSTER, E. C.Decision making in the employment interview. Montreal: Eagle , 1964.
33.
WEBSTER, E. C.The employment interview: A social judgment process. Schomberg, Ontario, Canada: S. I. P. Publications , 1982.
