The Psychodynamics of Organization Development Consultants

Abstract

Preliminary interviewing of organization development consultants suggested that, first, they tended to have a strongly developed ability to idealize, and second, they tended to see themselves as being shy individuals with considerable interpersonal difficulties. Such findings, along with an analysis of organization development values taken from -the literature, were interpreted from an object relations viewpoint. From this a hypothesis regarding the psychodynamics of organization development consultants was developed. Operational measures were devised and data collected using the Object Relations Technique (Phillipson, 1973). Some indicative findings are reported from fieldwork and comparisons made with clinical groups. Discussion of the difficulties of interpretation and implications for practice of this explanatory work conclude the paper.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BACK, K. The experiential group and society . Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 1973, 9 .

BECKHARD, R. Organization development. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley , 1969.

BENNIS, W. G. Organization development: Nature, origins and prospects. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley , 1970.

BIBRING, E. The so-called English School of Psychoanalysis . Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1947, 16, 69-93 .

BURNS, T. , & STALKER, G. M. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock , 1961.

COLEMAN, J. C. , ELKAN, G. , & SHOOTER, A. The perception of people and relation-ships: A study of four clinical groups using ORT . Proceedings of the International Congress on Rorschach. London: Hans Huber, 1970.

DACCORD, J. E. Management consultants: A study of the relationship between effectiveness and several personal characteristics. Unpublished Master's thesis, Sloan School, MIT, 1967.

EYSENCK, H. J.

Psychoanalysis-Myth or science?

Inquiry, 1963, 4(1).

DRUCKER, P. Managing for results. New York: Harper & Row , 1964.

10.

FAIRBAIRN, W. R. D. Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Tavistock , 1966.

11.

FRENCH, W. , & BELL, C. H. Organization development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1973.

12.

GANESH, S. R. Towards an understanding of consulting styles . ASCI Journal of Management, 1972, 2(1), 44-54 .

13.

GANESH, S. R. The missing link in organisation development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

14.

GILL, H. S. , & TRANFIELD, D. R. The role and training of the training specialist with regard to organisation development. Unpublished report to the Chemical and Allied Products Industry Training Board , 1972.

15.

GILL, H. S. , & TRANFIELD, D. R. The management of training and organisation development . Personnel Management, April 1973.

16.

GOODGE, P. The love/trust model and progress in organisation development . Journal of European Training, 1975, 4(3).

17.

GUNTRIP, H. A study of Fairbairn's theory of schizoid reactions . British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1952, XXL.

18.

HERMAN, S. M. The shadow of organisation development. In W. W. Burke (Ed.), Current issues and strategies in organisation development. Human Sciences Press , 1977.

19.

HOFFER, E. The true believer. New American Library , 1951.

20.

KLEIN, M. , & HEIMANN, P. Our adult world and other essays. Heinemann , 1963.

21.

KLEIN, M. , & RIVIERE, J. Love, hate and reparation. Hogarth Psychoanalytical Epitomes, No. 2, 1967.

22.

KLEIN, M. , HEIMANN, P. , RIVIERE, J. , & ISAACS, S. New directions in psychoanalysis. Hogarth , 1952.

23.

KLUCKHOHN, C. et al. Values and value orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shills (Eds.), Towards a general theory of action.

24.

MARGULIES, N. , & RAIA, A. P. Organization development, values process and technology. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1972.

25.

MERTON, R. K. , & KENDALL, P. L. The focused interview discussed. In M. Stacey (ed.), Methods of Social Research. Heinmann , 1956.

26.

PERROW, C. Organisational analysis. Social Science Paperbacks , 1970.

27.

PHILLIPSON, H. The object relations technique. London: Tavistock , 1955.

28.

PHILLIPSON, H. Object relations technique: Test and manual. NFER , 1973.

29.

PRATAASH, S. Some characteristics of an effective organization development agent. Unpublished Master's thesis, Sloan School, MIT, 1968.

30.

RICE, A. K. Organisation and environment. Social Science Paperbacks , 1963.

31.

SEABORNE-JONES, G. Treatment or torture? London: Tavistock .

32.

In N. Margulies & A. P. Raia , Educational values process and technology. New York: Norton , 1967.

33.

TICHY, N. Agents of planned social change: Congruence of values, cognitions and actions . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19(2).

34.

TRANFIELD, D. R. , & GILL, H. S. Organisation development and the training manager in the British chemical industry . Journal of European Training, Spring 1972.

35.

TRANFIELD, D. R. , SMITH, J. S. , GILL, H. S. , & SHIPTON, J. D. Introducing OD: Some problems and an alternative approach . Journal of European Training, 1975, 4, 3 .

36.

TRIST, E. , HIGGIN, G. W. , MURRAY, H. , & POLLOCK, A. B. Organisation choice, London: Tavistock , 1963.