Three types of control bases, namely, dependence, routinization, and collaboration, are identified as means of controlling workflow in organizations. These bases are seen to reflect the dominant methods of control used in market, bureaucratic, and collective organizations, respectively. It is hypothesized that the total amount of control bases available will lead to effective control, but as organizations will tend to economize upon control costs, it is also hypothesized that these three bases tend to be mutually exclusive. Other hypotheses suggest that the greater the complexity of a transaction the less likely that routinization, but the more likely collaboration, is used as a control base. These hypotheses are investigated in the setting of an aerospace research establishment where users of equipment have to link their activities with providers of technical services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARROW, K. J.The limits of organization. New York: W. W. Norton , 1974.
2.
ASTLEY, W. G. , AXELSSON, R. , BUTLER, R. J. , HICKSON, D. J. , & WILSON, D. C.Complexity and cleavage: Dual explanations of strategic decision making . Journal of Management Studies, 1982, 19(5), 357-375 .
3.
BARNARD, C. I.The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press , 1938.
4.
BLAU, P. M.Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley , 1967.
5.
BURNS, T. , & STALKER, G. M.The management of innovation. London: Tavistock , 1961.
6.
BUTLER, R. J. Power, technology, inter-role relations and role characteristics: A study of user-support function relations in NASA. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1973.
7.
BUTLER, R. J.A transactional approach to organizing efficiency: Perspectives from markets, hierarchies and collectives . Administration and Society, 1982, 13.
8.
BUTLER, R. J. , CRAY, D. , HICKSON, D. J. , MALLORY, G. R. , & WILSON, D. C.Strategic decision making: A large scale study. Working Paper, University of Bradford Management Center , 1982.
9.
CHANDLER, A. D.The visible hand. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press , 1977.
10.
CHILD, J.Organization: A guide to practice and problems. London: Harper and Row , 1977.
11.
COASE, R. H.The nature of the firm . Economica N.S., 1937, 4, 386-405 .
12.
COMMONS, J. R.Institutional economicsMadison: University of Wisconsin Press , 1934.
13.
CRAY, D.Control in multinational corporations . Paper presented at American Sociological Association Conference, New York, 1980.
14.
EMERSON, R. M.Power-dependence relations . American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 3140 .
15.
ETZIONI, A.Organizational control structure. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organization. Chicago: Rand McNally , 1965.
16.
FRENCH, J. R. P. , & RAVEN, B.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan , 1959.
17.
FIEDLER, F. E.A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1967.
18.
FRIEDMAN, M. , & FRIEDMAN, R.Free to choose: A personal statement. London: Secker and Warburg , 1980.
19.
GUETZKOW, H. , & SIMON, H. A.The impact of certain communication nets upon organization and performance in task-oriented groups . Management Science, April-July 1955, (1, 3, & 4).
20.
HAGE, J.Theories of organization: Form, process and transformation. New York: Wiley , 1980.
21.
HAYEK, F.The use of knowledge in society . American Economic Review, 1945, 35, 519-530 .
22.
HICKSON, D. J. , BUTLER, R. J. , ASTLEY, G. , & WILSON, D. C.Organizations as power. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. III). Greenwich, Conn.: J.A.I. Press , 1980.
23.
HICKSON, D. J. , HININGS, C. R. , LEE, C. A. , SCHNECK, R. E. , & PENNINGS, J. M.A strategic contingencies theory of interorganizational power . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16(2), 216-229 .
24.
HININGS, C. R. , HICKSON, D. J. , PENNINGS, J. M. , & SCHNECK, R. E.Structural conditions of interorganizational power . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19(1), 22-43 .
25.
HIRSCHMAN, A. O.Exit, voice and loyalty: Response to decline in firms, Organization and states. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press , 1970.
26.
HOBBSBAWN, E. J.Primitive rebels: Studies in archaic forms of social movement in the 19th and 20th centuries. New York: W. W. Norton , 1959.
27.
LAWRENCE, P. R. , & LORSCH, J. W.Organization and environment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press , 1967.
28.
MARCH, J. G. , & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley , 1958.
29.
MAUSS, M.The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Cohn and West , 1954.
30.
MERTON, R. K.Social theory and social theory, New York: Free Press , 1968.
31.
MILGRAM, S.Behavioral study of obedience . Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 1963, 67, 371-378 .
32.
MINTZBERG, H.The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1979.
33.
NUNNALLY, J. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1967.
34.
OUCHI, W. G.A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms . Management Science, 1979, 25(9), 833-848 .
35.
OUCHI, W. G.Markets, bureaucracies and elans , Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25, 129-141 .
