Abstract
A common feature in the assessment of on-going programs is the use of intuition and common sense in selecting and analyzing evidence. Although intuition nay provide rich insights into a specific situation, there is no way to ascertain whether the intuition represents good judgment or good politics. This article describes one means of selecting and analyzing evidence for assessing changing situations, and offers a procedure that light improve research on action-related problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
