A methodology for the detection of emerging paradigms is developed through the analysis of implicit and explicit criticisms. The search for the systems' paradigm reveals a set of systems frames at different stages of development. Four basic assumptions that underlie most systems frames and limit their use in the research, design, planning, and management of social systems are identified. A set of frames that may advance the systems movement are proposed. They are enclosed under the name of systemic-netfields and provide a link between systems and networks, aggregates, and fields.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACKOFF, R. L.Towards a system of systems concepts , Management Science, 1971, 17(11), 661-671 .
2.
ACKOFF, R. L.Redesigning the future. New York: Wiley , 1974.
3.
ACKOFF, R. L.National development planning revisited . Operationals Research, 1977, 25(2), 207-218 . (a)
4.
ACKOFF, R. L.Towards flexible organizations: A multidimensional design . Omega, 1977, 5(6). (b)
5.
ACKOFF, R. L.Resurrecting the future of operational research . Journal of the Operations Research Society, 1979, 30, 189-199 .
6.
BAHM, A. J.Systems theory: Hocus pocus or holistic science , General Systems, 1969, 14, 175-177 .
7.
BENVENISTE, G.The politics of expertise. Berkeley: Glendessary Press , 1972.
8.
BERLINSKI, D.On systems analysis: An essay on the limitations of mathematical methods on the social, political and biological sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press , 1976.
9.
BERLINSKI, D.Adverse notes on systems theory. In J. C. Klir (Ed.), Applied general systems research. New York: Plenum press , 1978.
10.
BERTALANFFY, L.Von The theory of open systems in physics and biology . Science, 1950, III, 23-29 .
11.
BERTALANFFY, L. VonGeneral system theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books , 1968.
12.
BEVAN, R. G. , & BRYER, R. A.On measuring the contribution of OR . Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 1978, 29, 409-418 .
13.
BOULDING, K. , General systems theory-the skeleton of science . Management Science, 1956, 2(3).
14.
BRYER, R. A.The status of the systems approach . Omega, 1979, 7(3), 219-231 .
15.
BUCKLEY, W. (Ed.). Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist. Chicago: Aldine , 1968.
16.
CHECKLAND, P. B.A systems map of the universe . Journal of Systems Engineering, 1971, 2(2).
17.
CHECKLAND, P. B.Towards a systems-based methodology for real world problem solving . Journal of Systems Engineering, 1972, 3(2).
18.
CHECKLAND, P. B.The development of systems thinking by systems practice -a methodology from an action research program. In R. Trappl & F. P. Hanika (Eds.), Progress in cybernetics and systems research (Vol. II). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere , 1975.
19.
CHECKLAND, P. B.Science and the systems paradigm . International Journal of General Systems, 1976, 3, 127-134 .
20.
CHEN, G. K. C.What is the systems approach?Interfaces, 1975, 6(1).
21.
CHURCHMAN, C. W.The design of inquiring systems. New York: Basic Books , 1971.
22.
CHURCHMAN, C. W.Perspectives of the systems approach . Interfaces, 1974, 4(4).
23.
CHURCHMAN, C. W.The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books , 1979.
24.
CLARK, B. R.The occupational saga in higher education . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 178-184 .
25.
CRANE, D.Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1972.
26.
DAVIS, S. M. , & LAWRENCE, P. R.Matrix. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley , 1977.
27.
De GREENE, K. B.Sociotechnical systems: Factors in analysis, design and management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1973.
EMERY, F. E. , & TRIST, E. L.Socio-technical systems. In F. E. Emery (Ed.), Systems thinking. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books , 1969.
30.
FOERSTER, H. Von . The curious behavior of complex systems: Lessons from biology. in H. A. Linstone & W. H. Clive Simmonds (Eds.), Futures research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley , 1977.
31.
GALL, J.Systemantics. New York: Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Co. , 1974.
32.
HALL, A. D. , & FAGEN, R. E.Definition of system . General Systems, 1956, I
33.
HALL, J. R. , & HESS, S. W.OR/MS: Dead or dying? RX for survival . Interfaces, 1978, 8(3).
34.
HOLLING, C. S.The curious behavior of complex systems: Lessons from ecology. In H. A. Linstone and W. H. Clive Simmonds (Eds.), Futures research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley , 1977.
35.
HOOS, I. D.Systems analysis as a technique for solving social problems -A realistic overview . Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1970, 4(1).
36.
HOOS, I. D.Systems analysis and public policy: A critique. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1972.
37.
HOOS, I. D.Engineers as analysts of social systems: A critical enquiry . Journal of Systems Engineering, 1976, 4(2), 81-88 .
38.
JENKINS, G. M.The systems approach . Journal of Systems Engineering, 1969, 1(1).
39.
JONES, A. W.On the limitations of GST in systems engineering.
40.
JONES, A. W.On the limitations of GST in systems engineering. In J. G. Klir (Ed.), Applied general systems research. New York: Plenum press , 1978.
41.
KAST, F. E. , & ROSENZWEIG, J. E.The modern view: A systems approach. In J. Beishon and G. Peters (Eds.), Systems behaviour. The open university press. London: Harper and Row , 1972.
42.
KLIR, G. J.An approach to general systems theory. New York: Wiley , 1969.
43.
LEE, A. M.Systems analysis frameworks. London: Macmillan , 1970.
44.
LILIENFELD, R.Systems theory as an ideology . Social Research, winter 1975, 42, 637-660 .
45.
LILIENFELD, R.Systems thinking in the social sciences. In R. Lilienfeld, The rise of systems theory. New York: Wiley , 1978.
46.
LINSTONE, H. A. , & CLIVE SIMMONDS, W. H. , Futures research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley , 1977.
47.
LUDZ, P. C.Marxism and system theory in a bureaucratic society . Social Research, 1975, 42, 661-674 .
48.
MATURANA, H. R. , & VARELA, F. J.Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel , 1980.
49.
MESAROVIC, M. D.Views on general systems theory. New York: Wiley , 1969.
50.
MEYER, J. , & ROWAN, B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony . American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 30, 431-450 .
51.
MICHAEL, D. N.Planning's challenge to the systems approach. In H. A. Linstone and W. H. Clive Simmonds (Eds.), Futures research. Reading, Mass: Addison-wesley , 1977.
52.
MINSKY, M.A framework for representing knowledge, Al Memo 306, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass. , June 1974.
53.
MITROFF, I. I. , & KILMANN, R. , On organizational stories: An approach to the design and analysis of organizations through myths and stories. In R. H. Kilmann , L. R. Pondy , & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization design: Strategies and implementation. New York: American Elsevier , 1976.
54.
MULKAY, M. J. , GILBERT, G. N. , & WOOLGAR, S.Problem areas and research networks in science . Sociology, 1975, 9(2).
55.
MULLINS, N. C.The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology . Minerva, 1972, 10(1).
56.
PHILLIPS, D. C.System theory-A discredited philosophy . Abacus, September 1969, 3-15 .
57.
PHILLIPS, D. C.Holistic thought in social science. Stanford: Stanford University Press , 1976.
58.
PONDY, L. R.The other hand clapping: An information processing approach to organizational power. In T. Hammer & S. Bacharach (Eds.), Reward systems and power distribution. Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations , 1977.
59.
PONDY, L. R. , & MITROFF, I. I.Beyond open system models of organization . Research in Organizational Behavior, 1979, 1, 3-39 .
60.
RAITT, R. A.Must we revolutionize our methodology?Interfaces, 1974, 4(2), 1-10 .
61.
RUBIN, A. D.Hypothesis formation and evaluation in medical diagnosis, AI-TR-316, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass. , January 1975.
62.
SACHS, W. M.Toward formal foundations of teleological systems science . General Systems, 1976, XXI, 145-152 .
63.
SCHWARTZ, P. , & OGILVY, J.The emergent paradigm: Toward an aesthetics of life . Unpublished manuscript presented at the ESOMAR Meeting in Barcelona, Spain, June 1980.
64.
SCOTT, W. G. , & MITCHELL, T. R.Organization theory. Georgetown, Ontario: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. , 1972.
65.
SILVERMAN, D.The theory of organization. New York: Basic Books , 1971.
66.
Systems analysis and operations research: A tool for policy and program planning for developing countries. Commission on International Relations, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. , 1976.
67.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1967.
68.
TRIST, E. L.A concept of organizational ecology . Australian Journal of Management, 1977, 2(2).
69.
TRIST, E. L.New directions of hope: Recent innovations interconnecting organizational, industrial, community and personal development . Regional Studies, 1979, 13, 439-451 .
70.
TRIST, E. L.The environment and system-response capability . Futures, April 1980.
71.
TRIST, E. L.The evolution of socio-technical systems, Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre , Occasional Paper No. 2, June 1981.
72.
VAN COURT , H. Systems analysis. In Progress in OR (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley , 1964.
73.
VAN GIGCH, J. P.Applied general systems theory (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row , 1978.
74.
VARELA, F. J.On being autonomous: The lessons of natural history for systems theory. In J. G. Klir (Ed.), Applied general systems research. New York: Plenum press , 1978.
75.
VICKERS, G.The future of culture. In H. A. Listone & W. H. Clive Simmonds, Futures research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley , 1977.
76.
WEICK, K. E.Middle range theories of social systems . Behavioral Science, 1974, 10(6).
