Developmental Patterns of Organizational Task Groups: A Preliminary Study

Abstract

The lack of research on organizational task group development is considered in the light of methodological difficulties, including group availability, threats to internal and external validity, and limitations of the existing research technology. Possible benefits from such research are compared to the difficulties. From this discussion a design for preliminary research more closely approaching the conditions of the organizational task group is developed and executed. This research tests and confirms a previously published model of task group development through the use of a Developmental Rating Scale. Clinical observations of the groups are used to supplement the conclusion of the study. The need for continued research in successive approximations of organizational task groups is suggested.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BALES, R. F. Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley , 1951.

BAVELAS, A. , & STRAUSS, G. Group dynamics and interpersonal relations. In William F. Whyte, Money and motivation. New York: Harper and Row , 1955.

BION, W. R. Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publications , 1959.

CAMPBELL, D. T. , & STANLEY, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally Co. , 1963.

DEUTSCH, M. The effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.) Group dynamics: Research and theory. New York: Harper and Row , 1968.

EMERY, F. E. Systems thinking. Baltimore: Penguin , 1969.

FARRELL, M. Patterns in the development of self-analytic groups . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1976, 12(4), 523-542 .

FEIBLEMAN, J. , & FRIEND, J. W. , The structure and function of organization . Philosophical Review, 1945, 54, 19-44 .

FREUD, S. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. New York: Bantam , 1960.

10.

HOMANS, G. The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company , 1950.

11.

JANIS, I. Victims of group think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company , 1972.

12.

LEWIN, K. Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper , 1948.

13.

MANN, R. D. Interpersonal styles and group development. New York: John Wiley and Sons , 1967.

14.

OBERT, S. L. Patterns of development in organizational task groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, 1979.

15.

RICHARDS, C. E. , & DOBYNS, H. F. Topography and culture: The case of the changing cage . Human Organization, 1957, 16, 16-20 .

16.

RUNKEL, P. J. , LAWRENCE, M. , OLDFIELD, S. , RIDER, M. , & CLARK C. Stages of group development: An empirical test of Tuckman's hypothesis . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971, 7, 180-193 .

17.

SLATER, P. E. Microcosm: Structural, psychological and religious evolution in groups. New York: John Wiley and Sons , 1966.

18.

SMITH, M. Social situation, social behavior, social group . Psychological Review, 1945, 52, 224-229 .

19.

SRIVASTVA, S. , OBERT, S. L. , & NEILSEN, E. H. Organizational analysis through group processes: A theoretical perspective for organization development. In Cary Cooper (Ed.) Organizational development in the UK and USA. London: Macmillan Press , 1977.

20.

TUCKMAN, B. W. Developmental sequence in small groups . Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 384-399 .

21.

TUCKMAN, B. W. , & JENSEN, M. A. C. Stages of small group development revisited . Group and Organization Studies, 1977, 2, 419-427 .