This paper reviews the development of sociotechnical systems theory and research over the past 30 years, paying particular attention to the evolution of the paradigm in North America during the past decade. Elements of sociotechnical systems theory discussed here include the conceptualization of social systems, technical systems, and open systems, joint optimization, organizational choice, variance control, boundary location, support congruence, quality of work life, and continuous learning. A review of 134 experiments is then summarized, indicating which features of sociotechnical systems design are used most frequently, and which in turn are associated with reported success on a number of critical outcome dimensions such as productivity, costs, quality, and satisfaction. An unexpected finding of this review was that while sociotechnical system experiments have been extremely successful overall, the number of experiments involving technological innovation or change is relatively small; moreover, from the results achieved in these experiments, it is obvious that we still have much to learn regarding the design of technical systems for joint optimization. Methodological issues and areas in need of further research are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDAG, R., & BRIEF, A.Impact of individual differences on employee affective responses to task characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 1975, 3, 311-322.
2.
ARAM, J., MORGAN, C., & ESBECK, E.Relation of collaborative interpersonal relationships to individual satisfaction and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 289-296.
3.
ARCHER, J.Achieving joint organizational, technical and personal needs. In L. Davis & A. Cherns (Eds.), The quality of working life. New York: Free Press, 1975.
4.
ATCHINSON, T., & LEFFERTS, E.The prediction of turnover using Herzberg's job satisfaction technique. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 53-64.
5.
BOSTROM, R., & HEINEN, S.MIS problems and failures: A sociotechnical perspective. MIS Quarterly, September, 1977, 17-32.
6.
BROWN, M.Identification of some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 4, 346-355.
7.
BUTERA, R.Environmental factors in job and organization design: The case of Olivetti. In L. Davis & A. Cherns, The quality of working life (Vol. 2). New York: Free Press, 1975.
8.
CAMPBELL, D., & STANLEY, J.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
9.
CHERNS, A.Principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 783-792.
10.
CHERNS, A., & WACKER, G.Analyzing social systems: The sociotechnical approach. Center for Quality of Working Life, UCLA, 1976.
11.
CLARK, J., & KRONE, C.Towards an overall view of organization development in the early seventies. In J. Thomas & W. Bennis (Eds.), Management of change and conflict. Baltimore: Penguin, 1972.
12.
COHEN, S., & TURNEY, J.Intervening at the bottom: Organizational development with enlisted personnel in an Army work-setting. Personnel Psychology, 1978, 31, 715-730.
13.
COOPER, R.Man, task, and technology: Three variables in search of a future. Human Relations, 1974. 25. 131-157.
14.
COOPER, R., & FOSTER, M.Sociotechnical systems. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 467-474.
15.
COTTER, J.Emerging opportunities in work system design. Center for Quality of Working Life, UCLA, 1977.
16.
CUMMINGS, T.Sociotechnical systems: An intervention strategy. In W. Burke (Ed.), Current issues and strategies in organization development. New York: Human Science Press, 1976.
17.
CUMMINGS, T., & SRIVASTVA, S.The management of work. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1977.
18.
DAVIS, L.Evolving alternative organizational designs: Their sociotechnical bases. Human Relations, 1977, 30, 261-273.
19.
DAVIS, L.Optimizing organization-plant design: A complementary structure for technical and social systems. Organizational Dynamics, 1979, 8, 2-15.
20.
DAVIS, L., & CHERNS, A., The quality of working life. New York, Free press, 1975, Volumes 1 and 2.
21.
DAVIS, L., & TAYLOR, T.Technology and job design. In L. Davis & J. Taylor (Eds.), Design ofjobs. Santa Monica, California: Goodyear, 1979.
22.
DAVIS, L., & TRIST, E.Improving the quality of work life: Sociotechnical case studies. In J. O'Toole (Ed.), Work and the quality of life. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1972.
23.
DeHAAN, U.Autonomy and technology: A contingency approach. Center for Quality of Working Life, UCLA, 1976.
24.
DUCKLES, M., DUCKLES, R., & MACCOBY, M.The process of change at Bolivar. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1977, 13, 387-400.
25.
EMERY, F.Characteristics of sociotechnical systems. Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc. 527, 1959.
26.
EMERY, F.Technology and social organization. Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, Doc. T-42, 1962.
27.
EMERY, F.Some hypotheses about the way in which tasks may be more effectively put together to make jobs. Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, Doc. T-176, 1963.
28.
EMERY, F.The assembly line: Its logic and our future. The Journal of the Institute of National Labor Institute Bulletin (New Delhi), 1975, 1, 1-90.
29.
EMERY, F., & THORSRUD, E.Form and content in industrial democracy. London: Tavistock, 1969.
30.
EMERY, F., & TRIST, E.The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 1965, 18, 21-31.
31.
EMINGTON, J. Organizational effectiveness in an army reserve command, Unpublished, HQ Forscom, Odcsper, Ft. McPherson, G. A., 1978.
32.
FADEM, J., & DeHAAN, U.Sociotechnical approaches to assembly design. Center for Quality of Working Life, UCLA, 1976.
33.
FAUNCE, W.Automation in the automobile industry: Some consequences for in-plant social structure. American Sociological Review, 1958, 23, 401-407.
34.
FORD, R.Motivation through the work itself. New York: AMA, 1969.
35.
FORD, R., & BORGATTA, E.Satisfaction with the work itself. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 54, 128-134.
36.
FRIEDLANDER, F.Peformance and interactional dimensions of organizational work groups. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 1966, 51, 257-265.
HERTOG, F.New leads in job design: The Phillip's case. In L. Davis & J. Taylor (Eds.), Design of Jobs, Santa Monica, California: Goodyear, 1979.
43.
HERZBERG, F.One more time: How do you motivate employyes?Harvard Business Review, 1968, 46, 53-62.
44.
HERZBERG, F., MAUSNER, B., & SNYDERMAN, B.The motivation to work. New York: Wiley, 1959.
45.
HILL, P.Towards a new philosophy of management. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1971.
46.
HORNER, W. Quality of worklife program: Gmad-Tarrytown. Unpublished, April, 1976.
47.
JAYARAM, G.Open systems planning. In W. Bennis, K. Benne, R. Chin, & K. Corey (Eds.), The planning of change (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.
48.
JENKINS, D.The truth at Volvo. Management Today, 1978, 84-89.
49.
LODAHL, T., & KEJNER, M.The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 50, 24-33.
50.
MACY, B., & JONES, A.The sociotechnical system at Bethesda Hospital. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 1976.
51.
MARGULIES, N.Organization culture and psychological growth. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4, 491-508.
52.
MARKUS, M., & POZA, E.Success story: The team approach to work restructuring. Organizational Dynamics, 1980, 8, 2-25.
53.
MEISSNER, M.Technology and the worker. San Francisco: Chandler, 1969.
54.
MILLER, E.Technology, territory and time: The internal differentiation of complex production systems. Human Relations, 1959, 12, 245-272.
55.
MILLER, E., & RICE, A.Systems of organization. London: Tavistock, 1967.
56.
MOBLEY, W., HAND, H., BAKER, R., & MEGLINI, B.Conceptual and empirical analysis of military recruit training attention. Jolurnal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 10-18.
57.
OSBALDESTON, M.Skandia Insurance: Group restructuring the work and enriching the job. Management International Review, 1976, 16, 9-22.
58.
PASMORE, W.Turning people on to work. In D. Kolb, J. Rubin, & I. McIntyre, Organizational psychology: A book of readings. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
59.
PASMORE, W.Over coming road blocks in work restructing. Organizational Dynamics, 1982, 10, 54-67.
60.
PASMORE, W., & KING, D.Understanding organizational change: A comparative study of multifaceted interventions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 1978. 14. 455-468.
61.
PASMORE, W., & SHERWOOD, J. (Eds.) Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. San Diego: University Associates, 1978.
62.
PASMORE, W., SRIVASTVA, S., & SHERWOOD, J.Social relationships and organizational performance: A sociotask approach. In W. Pasmore & J. Sherwood (Eds.), Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. San Diego: University Associates, 1978.
63.
PAUL, W., ROBERTSON, K., & HERZBERG, F.Job enrichment pays off. Harvard Business Review, 1969, 47, 691-678.
64.
POZA, E., & MARKUS, A.Success story: The team approach to work restructuring. Organizational Dynamics, 1980, 8, 2-25.
65.
RICE, A.Productivity and social organization: The Ahmedabad experiment. London: Tavistock, 1958.
66.
ROUSSEAU, D.Assessment of technology in organizations: Closed versus open systems approaches. Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4, 538-542.
67.
SRIVASTVA, S., SALIPANTE, P., CUMMINGS, T., NOTZ, W., BIGELOW, J., & WATERS, J.Job satisfaction an dproductivity. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University, 1975.
68.
STEERS, R.Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 22, 46-56.
69.
TAYLOR, J.Technology and planned organization change. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 1971.
70.
TAYLOR, J.The human side of work: The sociotechnical approach to work system design. Personnel Review, 1975. (a), 4.
71.
TAYLOR, J.The sociotechnical approach to work system design in hospitals (unpublished). Center for Quality of Working Life, UCLA, 1975. (b)
72.
TAYLOR, J.Employee participation in sociotechnical work system design: A white collar example. Center for Quality of Working Life, UCLA, 1976.
73.
TAYLOR, J.Experiments in work system design: Economic and human results. Personnel Review, 1977, 6, 21-34.
74.
TAYLOR, J.Fragmented office jobs and the computer. Center for Quality of Working Life, UCLA, 1978.
75.
TAYLOR, J., & BOWERS, D.The survey of organizations. Ann Arbor Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1972.
THORSRUD, E.Policy making as a learning process. In A. Cherns, R. Sinclair, & W. Jenkins (Eds.), Social sciences and government: Policies and problems. London: Tavistock, 1972.
78.
THORSRUD, E.Democracy at work: Norwegian experiments with nonbureaucratic forms of organization. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 1977, 13, 410-421.
79.
TICHY, N., & NISBERG, J.When does work restructuring work? Organizational innovations at Volvo and GM. Organizational Dynamics, 1976, 6, 63-80.
80.
TRIST, E.Engaging with large scale systems. Paper contributed to the McGregor Conference on Organizational Development, Endicott House, 1967.
81.
TRIST, E.Collaboration in work settings: A personal perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1977, 13, 268-278.
82.
TRIST, E.On sociotechnical systems. In W. Pasmore & J. Sherwood (Eds.), Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. San Diego: University Associates, 1978.
83.
TRIST, E.The evolution of sociotechnical systems. In A. Van DeVen & W. Joyce, Perspectives on organizational design and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1981.
84.
TRIST, E., & BAMFORTH, K.Some social and psychological consequences of the long wall method of coal-getting, Human Relations, 1951, 1, 3-38.
