This study tests the relationships among employee perceptions of task attributes and long-term productivity and job and overall satisfaction. Measures of perceived task attributes, individual growth need strength, and job and overall satisfaction were obtained by questionnaire from 100 randomly selected employees of a manufacturing firm. Productivity was computed as the average daily output (quantity adjustedfor quality) of each employee for a one-year period of time. Strong positive correlations were found between certain task attributes and productivity and job satisfaction. Overall satisfaction was unrelated to task attributes. Further, growth need strength was found to moderate the task attribute-job satisfaction relationships. This moderating effect was demonstrated by both subgroup and moderated regression analyses. No moderating effects were detected for either of the other two relationships. Finally, implications for future task design research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDAG, R. J., & BRIEF, A. P.Task design and employee motivation. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1979(a)
2.
ALDAG, R. J., & BRIEF, A. P.Examination of a measure of higher-order need strength. Human Relations, 1979, 8, 705-718.(b)
3.
ALDERFER, C. P.Existence, relatedness and growth.New York: Free Press, 1972.
4.
BRIEF, A. P., ALDAG, R. J.Employee reactions to job characteristics: A constructive replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 182-186.
5.
CUMMINGS, L. L., & SCHWAB, D. P.Performance in organization: Determinants and appraisal. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foreman and Company, 1973.
6.
EVANS, M. G., KIGGUNDI, M. N. & HOUSE, R. J.A partial test and extension of the job characteristic model of motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 24, 354-381.
7.
GRIFFIN, R. W.A longitudinal investigation of task characteristics relationships. The Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 99-113.
8.
GRIFFIN, R. W., MOORHEAD, G., JOHNSON, B. H., & CHONKO, L.B.The empirical dimensionality of the Job Characteristic Inventory. The Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 772-777.
9.
HACKMAN, J. R., & LAWLER, E.Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 259-286.
10.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.The Job Diagnostic Survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation ofjob redesign projects. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Department of Adminstrative Sciences, 1974.
11.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250-279.
12.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R., Work Redesign, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1980.
13.
HFNEMAN, H. G.Comparisons of self-and superior-ratings of managerial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 638-642.
14.
KLIMOSKI, R. J., & LONDON, M.Role of the rater in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 445-451.
15.
OLDHAM, G., HACKMAN, J., & PEARCE, J.Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 395-403.
16.
ORPEN, C.The effects of job enrichment on employee satisfaction, motivation, involvement, and performance: a field experiment. Human Relations, 1979, 32, 189-217.
17.
PETERS, W. S., & CHAMPOUX, J. E.The role and analysis of moderator variables in organizational research. In R. T. Mowday and R. M. Steers (Eds.), Research in organizations: Issues and controversies. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing Company, 1979.
18.
PIERCE, J., & DUNHAM, R.Task design: A literature review. Academy of Management Review, 1976, 1, 83-97.
19.
PIERCE, J. L., & DUNHAM, R. B.The measurement of perceived job characteristics: The Job Diagnostic Survey versus the Job Characteristics Inventory. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 123-128.
20.
SAUNDERS, D. R.Moderator variables in prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956, 16, 209-222.
21.
SIMS, H. P., & SZILAGYI, A. D.Job characteristic relationships: Individual and structural moderators. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 17, 211-230.
22.
SIMS, H. P., SZILAGYI, A. D., & KELLER, R. T.The measurement of job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 19, 195-212.
23.
STEERS, R., & SPENCER, D.The role of achievement motivation in job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 472-479.
24.
STONE, E. F.The moderating effect of work-related values on the job scope-job satisfaction relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 15, 147-167.
25.
STONE, E. F., MOWDAY, R. T., & PORTER, L. W.Higher-order need strengths as moderators of the job scope-job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 466-471.
26.
UMTOT, D. D., BELL, C. H., Jr., & MITCHELL, T. R.Effects of job enrichment and task goals on satisfaction and productivity: Implications for job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 379-394.
27.
WANOUS, J.Individual differences and reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 616-622.
28.
WH.ITE, J. K.Individual differences and the job quality-worker response relationship: Review, integration, and comments. Academy of Management Review, 1978, 3, 267-280.
29.
WHITE, S. E., & MITCHELL, T. R.Job enrichment versus social cues: A comparison and competitive test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 1-9.
30.
ZEDECK, S.Problems with the use of moderator variables. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 295-310.
