The Relationship Between Size and Performance of Mail Sorting Offices

Abstract

The paper gives the main results of studies on the size-performance relatio ship of mail sorting offices in two of the developed countries. A distinct optimum size was found at about 450 total operatives and the major factors causing the declining performance of larger offices were identified as deteriorating motivation, increasing specialization in work method, and a poorer industrial relations climate. The performance of small offices is believed to be adversely affected by the minimum number of operatives needed to guarantee service during periods of low demand but who cannot be fully occupied. Special attention was paid to the definition of terms and to statistical technique as these matters have been noted as weaknesses of some previous studies on the effects of size in organizations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ALDRICH, H. E. Technology and organizational structure: A re-examination of the findings of the Aston Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 26-26.

BASS, B. M. & BARRETT, G. V. Man work and organizations, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972.

BLAU, P. M. A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 201-201.

CAMPBELL, W. J. , COTTERELL, J. L. , ROBINSON, N. M. , & SADLER, D. R. Effects of school size upon some aspects of personality. Journal of Educational Administration, Summer 1981, 19, 2-2.

EMERY, F. E. , & PHILLIPS, C. Living at work. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1976.

FREEMAN, J. H. Environment, technology and the administrative intensity of manufacturing organizations. American Sociological Review, 1973, 38, 750-750.

FREEMAN, J. H. , & HANNAN, M. T. Growth and decline processes in organizations. American Sociological Review, 1975, 40, 215-215.

FUCHS, V. R. (Ed.). Production and productivity in the service industries. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.

HREBINIAK, L. G. , & ALUTTO, J. K. A comparative study of performance and size correlates in inpatient psychiatric departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1973, 18, 365-365.

10.

HUNT, J. W. The elusive question of size in organizations. Personnel Practice Bulletin, 1973, 29, 35-35.

11.

INGHAM, G. K. Size of industrial organizations and worker behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

12.

KIMBERLEY, J. R. Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 571-571.

13.

MASSAM, B. Location and space in social administration, London: Arnold, 1975.

14.

MORAN, M. The union of post office workers. London: Macmillan, 1974.

15.

NEGANDHI, A. R. , & REIMANN, B. C. Task environments, decentralization and organizational effectiveness, Human Relations, 1973, 26, 203-203.

16.

PARKINSON, C. N. Parkinsons Law, London: John Murray, 1961.

17.

PETER, H. W. , & DICK, R. N. Changing attitudes in a mail exchange. Work and people, 1977, 3(3/4).

18.

TEITZ, N. B. Towards a theory of urban public facility location. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1968, 21, 35-35.

19.

U.K. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT The incidence of industrial stoppage in the United Kingdom. Department of Employment Gazette, February 1976.

20.

VROOM, V. H. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.

21.

WOODWARD, J. Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London. Oxford University Press, 1965.

22.

WOODWARD, J. , (Ed.) Industrial organization: Behaviour and control. London. Oxford University Press, 1970.

23.

WRIGHT, L. M. Conditions for the realization of the efficient mechanization of letters In Proceedings of the International Conference on Postal Mechanization, Wiesbaden, Deutsche Bundespost, 1980.