A simulation of a supervisor-worker conflict was performed with fourperson groups in either a face-to-face or a television-mediated communication setting. Face-to-face groups were more likely to reach solutions indicative of high intragroup conflict. Although mean values did not differ, there was more variability among face-to-face groups in discussion time and measures of supervisor dominance. These results were interpreted as suggesting that electronic mediation serves to weaken the forces of emergent leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BECKHOUSE, L., TANUR, J., WEILER, J., & WEINSTEIN, E.And some men have leadership thrust upon them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 557-566.
2.
CHAPANIS, A.Interactive human communication. Scientific American, 1975, 232, 36-42.
3.
DWYER, T. F.Television therapy. In J. H. Masserman (Ed.), Current psychiatric therapies (Vol. 16). New York: Grune and Stratton, 1976.
4.
GOLDBERG, M. L., & WELLENS, A. R.A comparison of nonverbal compensatory behaviors within direct face-to-face and television-mediated interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1979, 9, 250-260.
5.
HOFFMAN, L., HARBURG, E., & MAIER, N.Differences and disagreements as factors in creative group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 206-214.
6.
HOLLANDER, E., & JULIAN, J.Leadership. In E. Borgatta & W. Lambert (Eds.), Hand book of personality theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
7.
MAIER, N.Principles of Human Relations. New York: Wiley, 1952.
8.
MURLEY, I. E. & STEPHENSEN, G. M.Interpersonal and Inter-party exchange. A laboratory simulation of an industrial negotiation at the plant level. British Journal of Psychology, 1969, 60, 543-545.
9.
MORLEY, I. E., & STEPHENSON, G. M.Formality in experimental negotiations: A validation study. British Journal of Psychology, 1970, 61, 383-384.
10.
SHORT, J., WILLIAMS, E., & CHRISTIE, B.The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley, 1976.
11.
SIEGAL, S., & TUKEY, J. W.A nonparametric sum of ranks procedure for relative spread in unpaired samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1960, 55, 429-445.
12.
SMITH, D.Communication and negotiation outcome. Journal of Communication, 1969, 19, 248-256.
13.
SOLOW, C., WEISS, R., BERGEN, B., & SANBORN, C.24-Hour psychiatric consultation via TV. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, 127, 120-123.
14.
STEPHENSON, G., AYLING, K., & RUTTER, D.The role of visual communication in social exchange. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 15, 113-120.
15.
STRAKER, N., MOSTYN, P., & MARSHALL, C.The use of two-way TV in bringing mental health services to the inner city. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1976, 133, 1202-1205.
16.
STRICKLAND, L., GUILD, P., BAREFOOT, J., & PATTERSON, S.Teleconferencing and leadership emergence. Human Relations, 1978, 31, 583-596.
17.
TURNBULL, A., STRICKLAND, L., & SHAVER, K.Medium of communication, differential power, and phasing of concessions: Negotiating success and attributions to the opponent. Human Communication Research, 1976, 2, 262-270.
18.
WICHMAN, H.Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 114-120.
19.
WILLIAMS, E.Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 963-976.
20.
WILSON, C., & WILLIAMS, E.Watergate words: A naturalistic study of media and communication. Communication Research, 1977, 4, 169-178.
