This study attempted to assess the attitudes of American city and county daily newspaper reporters and editors toward reporter decision-making, and to determine existing decision-making practices. A national sample demonstrated that reporters want, in general, to be consulted by management before management makes decisions. On several work-related decisions, however, reporters want to control the decision-making process; on other issues, they have relatively little participation interest. Editors want less reporter participation than reporters, and the difference is substantial on many work-related issues. Female editors would allow slightly more reporter decision-making than male editors. These reporters also want more participation than exists. Smaller newspaper organizations allow more reporter decision-making than larger news organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARGYRIS, C.Behind the front page. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
CANNON, L.Reporting: An inside view. Sacramento, Calif.: California Journal Press, 1977.
4.
COOPER, M. R.Changing employee values: Deepening discontent. Harvard Business Review, 1979,57, 117-125.
5.
DERBER, M.Crosscurrents in workers' participation. Industrial Relations, 1970, 9, 123-136.
6.
DOWNIE, L.The new muckrackers. Washington: The New Republic Book, 1976.
7.
DUNWOODY, S.Newsgathering behaviors of specialty reporters: A two-level comparison of mass media decision-making. Newspaper Research Journal, 1979, 1, 31-31.
8.
FINLEY, L.Whatever happened to voice in the product?Chicago Journalism Review, 1973, 6, 6-7.
9.
GHIGLIONE, L.Evaluating the press. Southbridge, Mass.: New England Daily Newspaper Survey, 1973.
10.
GREINER, L.What managers think of participative leadership. Harvard Business Review, 1973,51, 111-117.
11.
HUENERGARD, C.Minneapolis Star battles to turn things around. Editor & Publisher, February 3, 1979, 12.
12.
JENKINS, D.Industrial democracy in Europe. Geneva: Business Industrial, 1974.
13.
JOHNSTON, J.The news people. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1976.
14.
KATZ, D., & KAHN, R.The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1966.
15.
LIKERT, R., & LIKERT, J.New ways of managing conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
16.
LIKERT, R.New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
17.
LUBIN, J.Discrimination against women in newsrooms: Fact or fantasy. Journalism Quarterly, 1972, 49, 357-361.
18.
MARROW, A.Management by participation. New York: Harper, 1967.
MEDIA REPORT. Six women file sex discrimination complaints against Detroit News. Media Report to Women, March 1, 1977; Coalition of women's organizations in Detroit see news changes for women. Media Report to women, April 1, 1977; EEOC finds Newsday discrimination in job classification and promotion. Media Report to Women, January 1, 1977; Woman suing New York Times wins class action status in federal court. Media Report to Women, May 1, 1977; Pamela Meyer sues Post Dispatch for back pay and reimbursement for cost experience, training opportunities and benefits. Media Report to Women, June 1, 1977.
26.
NAYMAN, O.PR personnel and print journalists: A comparison of professionalism. Jcurnalism Quarterly, 1977, 54, 492-497.
27.
NOCERA, J.Making it at the Washington Post. The Washington Monthly, 1979, 10, 10-22.
28.
O'TOOLE, J.Work and the quality of life. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1974.
29.
REED, B.Sexism in the media world. In Michael Emery & Ted Curtis Smythe (Eds.), Readings in mass communication (4th ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Brown, 1980.
30.
RYAN, M.Attitudes of scientists and journalists toward media coverage of science news. Journalism Quarterly, 1979, S6, 18-26; 53.
31.
SIGAL, L.Reporters and officials, Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1973.
32.
SMITH, L.When the workers are bosses. Dun's Review, 1977, 109, 84-88.
33.
TIME, Democracy in Minneapolis, 1979, 113, 49-49.
34.
TUCHMAN, G.Making news. New York: Free Press, 1979.
