Most psychological research on expository writing is conducted within a purely cognitive paradigm. Writing provides a test case of its generality because the claims which writers make about their experience are incompatible with any purely cognitive model. We maintain that the fundamental problem of writing is affective, concerned specifically with the attitudes of openness and trust. A method of writing is presented which we conjecture induces such attitudes. Its efficacy may be tested on individuals suffering from writing difficulties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANDERSON, J. R.Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1980.
2.
BRITTON, J., BURGESS, T., MARTIN, N., McLEOD, W., & ROSEN, H.The development of writing abilities (11-18). London: Macmillan, 1975.
3.
COLLINS, A., & GENTNER, D.A framework for a cognitive theory of writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
4.
DREYFUS, H. L.What computers can't do. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
5.
ELBOW, P.Writing without teachers. London: Oxford University Press, 1973.
6.
FLOWER, L. S., & HAYES, J. R.The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
7.
GALBRAITH, D.The effect of conflicting goals in writing: A case study. In P. C. Wason (Ed.) The dynamics of writing. Visible Language, 14, 364-375.
8.
GETZELS, J. W., & CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M.The creative vision: a longitudinal study of problem finding is art. New York: Wiley, 1976.
9.
GOULD, J. D.Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. W. Greegg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
10.
HAYES, J. R. & FLOWER, L. S.Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
11.
HEBB, D. O., & BINDRA, D.Scientific writing and the general problem of communication. American Psychologist, 1952, 7, 569-573.
12.
KARMILOFF-SMITH, A., & INHELDER, B.If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition, 1974/75, 3, 195-212.
13.
KUBIE, L. S.Neurotic distortion of the creative process. Kansas: University of Kansas Press, 1958.
14.
LACHMAN, R., LACHMAN, J. L., & BUTTERFIELD, E. C.Cognitive psychology and information processing: an introduction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979.
15.
LERMAN, C.The institutional voice and control of topic. In H. Davies and P. Walton (Eds.). Language, image, media. Oxford: Blackwells, 1981.
16.
LOWENTHAL, D., & WASON, P. C.Academics and their writing. The Times Literary Supplement, 1977, 24 June, p. 781-781. (Reprinted in abridged form in Leonardo, 1981, 14, p. 57.)
17.
MADDOX, H. Academics and their writing. Unpublished manuscript based on a survey conducted in the University of New South Wales, 1978.
18.
NEWELL, A., & SIMON, H. A.Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1972.
19.
SCARDAMALIA, M.How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing. In C. H. Frederiksen, M. F. Whiteman, & J. F. Dominic (Eds.). Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum (in press).
20.
TWENEY, R. D., DOHERTY, M. E., WORNER, W. J., PLISKE, D. B., & MYNATT, C. R.Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980, 32, 109-123.
21.
WASON, P. C.On writing scientific papers. Physics Bulletin, 1970, 21, 407-408. (Reprinted in J. Hartley (Ed.). The psychology of written communication. London: Kogan Page, 1980.
22.
WASON, P. C.Specific thoughts on the writing process. In L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980a.
23.
WASON, P. C.Conformity and commitment in writing. In P. C. Wason (Ed.). The dynamics ofwriting. Visible Language, 1980b. 14, 351-363.
