Quasiexperimental Research in Organizations: A Critique and Proposed Typology

Abstract

The experiment has been the hallmark of empirical science. In recent years, the impracticality and sometimes impossibility of conducting ex-periments in real organizations has led to the increased use of quasiex-perimental research designs. This paper begins with a review of the ad-vantages and disadvantages of traditional experiments. Two major categories of quasiexperimental designs are then presented. Constructive techniques are evolutionary and make improvements on the basis of prior experience. Accommodative techniques adjust to the demands of the research situation. The paper is concluded with a method of classifying and selecting quasiexperimental designs on the basis of the purpose of the research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BERLIN, V. N.

Administrative experimentation: A methodology for more rigorous "muddling through."

Management Science, 1978, 24, 789-799.

BRIGHTMAN, H. The need for repeated measurement designs in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 1971, 14, 398-402.

CAMPBELL, D. T. , & STANLEY, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.

CUNNINGHAM, B. Action research: Toward a procedural model. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 215-238.

DeVALL, M. , BOLAS, C. , & KANG, T. S. Applied social research in industrial organiza-tions: An evaluation of functions, theory, and methods. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1976, 12, 158-177.

EVANS, M. G. Opportunistic organizational research: The role of patch-up designs. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 98-108.

FRENCH, W. L. , & BELL, C. H., Jr. Organizational development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall, 1978.

LAWLER, E. E., III . Adaptive experiments: An approach to organizational behavior research. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2, 576-585.

LEVI, A. M. , & BENJAMIN, A. A constructive method of developing complex applied models. Human Relations, 1978, 31, 353-362.

10.

LUNDBERG, C. C. Hypothesis creation in organizational research. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 1976, 1, 5-12.

11.

MacKENZIE, K. D. , & HOUSE, R. Paradigm development in the social sciences: A proposed research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 1978, 3, 7-23.

12.

SCOTT, W. E., Jr. The development of knowledge in organizational behavior and human performance. Decision Sciences, 1975, 6, 142-165.

13.

SKYIA, E. , & SHEEHAN, P. W. The human subject; A study of individual experimental participation. Human Relations, 1977, 30, 143-154.

14.

SUSMAN, G. I. , & EVERED, R. D. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 582-603.

15.

WEICK, K. E. Amendments to organizational theorizing. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 487-502.

16.

WEICK, K. E. Laboratory experimentation with organizations: A reappraisal. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2, 123-127.

17.

WINKLER, R. L. , & MURPHY, A. H. Experiments in the laboratory and real world. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 10, 252-270.