The Effects of Formal Employee Participation in Ownership and Decision Making on Perceived and Desired Patterns of Organizational Influence: A Longitudinal Study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 1981
The Effects of Formal Employee Participation in Ownership and Decision Making on Perceived and Desired Patterns of Organizational Influence: A Longitudinal Study
This paper examines possible effects of introduction of formal employee participation in ownership and decision making on patterns of organizational influence, using longitudinal data obtained before and after conversion of an electronics firm to partial employee ownership. Although numerous formal participation mechanisms were introduced, including employee board representation, an employee council, and quarterly shareholder meetings, little change was found in perceived worker participation at any decision level. Employee ownership did not seem to increase desires for worker influence among either managers or nonmanagers, nor did it appear to significantly affect the total amount and distribution of influence within the organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALLUTO, J., & BELASCO, J. A.A typology for participation in organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 117-125.
2.
BECKER, N.Three productive cooperatives in the Netherlands: A description of some characteristics and differences with respect to participation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Alternative Organizations, Copenhagen, Denmark, May, 1980.
3.
BERLE, A. A., & MEANS, G. C.The modern corporation and private property. New York: MacMillan, 1932.
4.
BELLAS, C. J.Industrial democracy and the worker owned firm: A study of twenty-one plywood companies in the Pacific northwest. New York: Praeger, 1972.
5.
BERNSTEIN, P.Workplace democratization: Its internal dynamics. Kent, Ohio: Compartive Administration Research Institute, 1976.
6.
CONTE, M., & TANNENBAUM, A. S.Employee owned companies: Is the difference measureable?Monthly Labour Review, July, 1978, 23-28.
7.
DERRICK, P., & PHIPPS, J. F. (Eds.). Co-ownership, co-operation and control, An industrial objective. London: Longmans, Green, 1969.
8.
ESPINOSA, J. G., & ZIMBALIST, A. S.Economic democracy: Workers participation in Chilean industry 1970-1973. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
9.
EMERY, F., & THORSRUD, E.Form and content in industrial democracy, some experiences from Norway and other European countries. London: Tavistock, 1964.
10.
FRENCH, J. P., ISRAEL, J., & AS, D.An experiment in participation in a Norweigian factory. Human Relations, 1960, 13, 3-19.
11.
HAMMER, T. H., & STERN, R. N.Employee ownership: Implications for the organizational distribution of power. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 78-100.
12.
HESPE, G., & WALL, T.The demand for participation among employees. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 411-428.
13.
HILGENDORF, E. L., & IRVING, B. L.Workers experience of participation: The case of British Rail. Human Relations, 1976, 29(5) 471-505.
14.
HOLTER, H.Attitudes towards employee participation in company decision-making processes. Human Relations, 1965, 18, 297-321.
15.
JOHANNESEN, J.VAG: A need for education. Industrial Relations, 1979, 18(3), 364-369.
16.
KATZELL, R., YANKELOVICH, D. & ASSOCIATES. Work, productivity, and job satisfaction. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1975.
17.
LONG, R. J.The relative effects of share ownership vs. control on job attitudes in an employee-owned company. Human Relations, 1978, 31(9), 753-763. (a)
18.
LONG, R. J.The effects of employee ownership on organizational identification, job attitudes, and organizational performance: A tentative framework and empirical findings. Human Relations, 1978, 31(1), 29-48. (b)
19.
LONG, R. J.Desires for and patterns of worker participation in decision-making after conversion to employee ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22(3), 611-617.
20.
LONG, R. J.Job attitudes and organizational performance under employee ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23(4), 726-737.
21.
MULDER, M.Power equalization through participation?Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 31-39.
