An Application of Turquet's Basic-Assumption Oneness to the Analysis of a Group in Search of Utopia

Abstract

This article examines Turquet's basic-assumption oneness as it applies to the large group setting. Oneness is seen as a group myth serving the major function of avoiding membership schisms, and allows members to avoid the anxiety attendant upon the identity problems that emerge in a large group. One particular group is examined. Here a myth of oneness is supported by the members' institutionalized assumption that they cannot arrive at wrong, bad, or unwise decisions. The unity provided by the myth enables the group to pursue a course that members believe will lead to a utopian society. The myth however prevents members from acting in an independent manner and from examining their beliefs. The dynamics of one particular group session are examined in detail.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BION, W. R. Attention and interpretation: A scientific approach to insight in psychoanalysis and groups. London: Tavistock Publications, 1970.

BION, W. R. Experiences in groups, London: Tavistock Publications, 1961.

COHN, N. The pursuit of the millennium. London: Paladin, 1970.

CARTWRIGHT, D. The nature of Group Cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.), New York: Harper and Row, 1968.

DeMARE, P. The Politics of Large Groups. In L. Kreeger , (Ed.), The large group: Dynamics and therapy. London: Constable, 1975.

HIRSH, J. Behavior genetic analysis and its biosocial consequences, Seminars in Psychiatry, 1970 2(1)

JACQUES, E. Social systems as a defense against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In G. S. Gibbard , J. J. Hartman , & R. D. Mann (Eds.), Analysis of group's contributions to theory research and practice. London: Jossey Bass, 1974.

JANIS, I. L. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1972.

KASS, G. The economic problem is a human one: Developing a person-centered approach to Community. City, Mass. Kass, 1978.

10.

LAWRENCE, G. Introductory essay: Exploring boundaries in G. Lawrence (Ed.), Exploring Individual and Organisational Boundaries: A Tavistock open systems approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.

11.

MAIN, T. "Same Psychodynamics of Large Groups" in L. Kreeger (Ed.), The large group: Dynamics and therapy. London. Constable, 1975.

12.

OPIE, I. , & OPIE, P. Children's games in street and playground, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.

13.

ROGERS, C. R. On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. London: Constable, 1967.

14.

ROGERS, C. R. On personal power, inner strength and its revolutionary impact. New York: Delta, 1977.

15.

ROGERS, C. R. Building person-centered communities: The implications for the future. In A. Villoldo & K. Dychtwald , (Eds.), Revisioning human potential: Glimpses into the 21st century.(a),

16.

ROGERS, C. R. The foundations of the person-centered approach. La Jolla, Calif: Carl R. Rogers, 1979. (b)

17.

SHERIF, M. , HARVEY, O. J. , WHITE, B. J. , HOOD, W. R. , & SHERIF, C. W. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The rober's cave experiment. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, 1961.

18.

TURQUET, P. M. Leadership: The individual and the group. In G. S. Gibbard , J. J. Hartman , & R. D. Mann (Eds.), Analysis of group's contributions to theory research and practice. London: Jossey Bass, 1974.

19.

TURQUET, P. M. Threats to identity in the large group. In L. Kreeger (Ed.), The large group: Dynamics and therapy. London: Constable, 1975.

20.

WISDOM, O. Emergence Group properties. In R. Borger , & F. Cioffi (Eds.), Explanation in the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.