The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a special program on the level of authoritarianism of subjects with high scores on the California F scale. The subjects were graduate students of education, mostly from developing countries. The design called for measuring gain in two equivalent groups one of which received a specially constructed counter-authoritarian treatment while the other was used as a control group. The method of pooling variances was used for data processing, and the results showed a significant reduction in post-test F scores in the experimental group. While the findings demonstrate feasibility of introducing counter-authoritarian influences into teacher training programs, certain issues are raised and discussed, especially in regarding to permanence of such changes as those obtained in this experiment, and the need for support elements in the teaching environment for the purpose of reinforcement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK, E., LEVINSON, D. J., & SANFORD, R. N.The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1950.
2.
AIKEN, M. T. et al. Economic failure, alienation and extremism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1968.
3.
ANDERSON, H. H.The measurement of domination and of socially integrative behavior in teachers' contact with children. Child Development, 1939, 10, 73-89.
4.
ANDERSON, H. H., & BREWER, J. E.Studies of teachers' classroom personalities, I: Dominative and socially integrative behavior of kindergarten teachers. Psychological Psychological Monographs, 1945, 6.
5.
ANDERSON, H. H., & BREWER, J. E.Studies of teachers' classroom personalities, II: effects of teachers' dominative and integrative contacts on children's classroom behavior. Psychological Monographs, 1946, 8.
6.
ANDERSON, H. H., BREWER, J. E., & REED, M. F.Studies of teachers' dominative and integrative contacts on children's behavior. Psychological Monographs, 1946, 11.
7.
AYERS, J., ROHR, M., & ROHR, E.College major, authoritarianism and attitudes toward women. College Student Journal, 1978, 12, 236-239.
8.
BANDURA, A.Social learning theory of identification process. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
9.
BANDURA, A., & WALTER, R. H.Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963.
10.
DERBER, C.Unemployment and the entitled worker: Job entitlement and radical political attitudes among the youthful unemployed. Social Problems, 1978, 26, 26-37.
11.
DEUTCH, M.Trust, trustworthiness, and the F-scale. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, LXI, 138-140.
12.
EHRLICH, H. J.Dogmatism and learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, LXII, 148-149.
13.
EISENMAN, R., & CHERRY, H.Creativity, authoritarianism and birth order. Journal of Social Psychology, 1965, LX, 171-179.
FODOR, E. M.Group stress, authoritarian style and control, and use of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 313-318.
16.
FROMM, E.Escape from freedom. New York: Farrar and Reinhart, 1941.
17.
GRABB, E.Working-class authoritarianism and tolerance of outgroups: A reassessment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1979, 43, 36-47.
18.
HALVERSON, C. F., & SHORE, R. E.Self-disclosure and interpersonal functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, XXXIII(2), 213-217.
19.
HAMILTON, R. F.Class and Politics in the United States. New York: Wiley, 1972.
20.
HESS, K., & LINDNER, R.Dogmatism and self-esteem: A negative relationship confirmed. Psychological Reports. 1973, XXXII, 158-158.
21.
KORNHAUSER, W.The politics of mass society. New York: Free Press, 1959.
22.
LEEDS, C. H.A scale for measuring teacher-pupil attitudes and teacher-pupil rapport, Psychological Monographs, 1950 (No. 6).
23.
LEVINSON, D. J., & SCHERMERHORN, R. A.Emotional-attitudinal effects of an intergroup relations workshop on its members. Journal of Psychology, 1951, XXXI, 243-256.
24.
LIPSET, S. M.Democracy and working class authoritarianism. American Sociological Review, 1959, 24, 482-502.
25.
LUCK, J. I., & GRUNDER, C. R.Note on authoritarianism and critical thinking ability. Psychological Reports, 1970, XXVII, 380-380.
26.
MELIKIAN, L. H.Some correlates of authoritarianism in two cultural groups. Journal of Psychology, 1956, XLII, 237-248.
27.
PAPASTAVROU, A. Authoritarianism and organizational climate in Greek elementary schools in Cyprus. Unpublished M.A. thesis, American University of Beirut, 1973.
28.
PLANT, W. T.Longitudinal changes in intolerance and authoritarianism for subjects differing in amount of college education over four years. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1965, 72, 247-287.
29.
PROTHRO, E. T., & MELIKIAN, L. H.The California F-scale in an authoritarian culture. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1953, XVII, 353-362.
30.
REES, R. T., & GROGAN, J.The relation of sexism and authoritarianism in teacher attitudes. Phi Delta Kappan, 1978, 59, 564-564.
31.
REBHUN, M. T.Dogmatism and test anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 1966, LXII, 39-40.
32.
SAMPSON, E. E.Personality and the location of identity. Journal of Personality, 1978, 46, 552-568.
33.
SANFORD, F. H.Authoritarianism and leadership: A study of the followers' orientation to authority. Philadelphia: Institute for Research in Human Relations, 1950.
34.
SARTRE, J.-P.Portrait of the antisemite. Partisan Review, 1946, XIII, 163-178.
35.
SCARR, S.How to reduce authoritarianism among teachers: The human development approach. Journal of Educational Research, 1970, LXIII, 367-372.
36.
SNEDECOR, G. W., & COCHRAN, W. G.Statistical methods, 6th Ed.Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press, 1967.
37.
VACCHIANE, R., STAUS, R., & HOCKMAN, L.The open and closed mind: A review of dogmatism. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, LXXI, 261-273.
38.
VERMILLION, W. H., Jr., LEFTWICH, W. H., REMMERS, H. H.Teacher authoritarianism versus teaching effectiveness as perceived by students. In H. H. Remmers (Ed.), Anti-democratic attitudes in American schools. Northwestern University Press, 1963.
39.
WARD, G. R., CUNNINGHAM, C. H., & SUMMERLIN, M. L.Personality profiles and dogmatism in undergraduate teacher education students. Psychology in the Schools, 1974, 15, 33-36.
40.
WHITE, R., & LIPPIT, R.Leader behavior and member reaction in three "social climates." In Group dynamics: Research and theory. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Evanston, Illinois: Row Peterson and Company, 1960.
