This study examines the moderating effects of two task variables-role ambiguity and job complexity-and subordinate locus of control on the relationship of leader initiating structure and consideration to subordinate intrinsic satisfaction and job involvement. Data were collected from a sample of 89 middle-lower level managers of a large, heavy-equipment manufacturing firm in the Midwest. Moderated regression analysis was performed on the data. Significant interactions were obtained between leader consideration and each of role ambiguity, job complexity, and locus of control. Leader initiating structure has a significant interaction with locus of control, but the direction is opposite that predicted. Implications of the findings for the path-goal theory of leadership, future research, and leadertask design match are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABDEL-HALIM, A. A., & ROWLAND, K. M.Some personality determinants of the effects of participation: A further investigation. Personnel Psychology, 1976, 29, 41-55.
2.
ANDERSON, C. R., HELLRIEGEL, D., & SLOCUM, J. W., Jr.Managerial response to environmentally induced stress. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20, 260-272.
3.
ANDERSON, C. R., & SCHNEIER, C. E.Locus of control, leader behavior and leader performance among management students. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 690-698.
4.
BEEHR, T. A.Perceived situational moderators of the relationship between subjective role ambiguity and role strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 35-40.
5.
COHEN, J.Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 426-443.
6.
COUCH, P. D.Learning to be a middle manager. Business Horizons, February 1979, 33-41.
7.
DESSLER, G. An investigation of a path-goal theory of leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, 1973.
8.
DESSLER, G., & VALENZI, E. R.Initiation of structure and subordinate satisfaction: A path analysis test of path-goal theory. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20, 251-259.
9.
DOWNEY, H. K., SHERIDAN, J. E., & SLOCUM, J. W., Jr.Analysis of relationships among leader behavior, subordinate job performance and satisfaction: A path-goal approach. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 253-262.
10.
DOWNEY, H. K., SHERIDAN, J. E., & SLOCUM, J. W., Jr.The path-goal theory of leadership: A longitudinal analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 156-176.
11.
DURAND, D. E., & NORD, W. R.Perceived leader behavior as a function of personality characteristics of supervisors and subordinates. Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 19, 426-438.
12.
EVANS, M. G.Extensions of a path-goal theory of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 172-178.
13.
FIEDLER, F. E.A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
14.
GREENE, C. N.Questions of causation in the path-goal theory of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 22-41.
15.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.
16.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250-279.
17.
HOUSE, R. J.A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 321-338.
18.
HOUSE, R. J., & DESSLER, G.The path-goal theory of leadership: Some post hoc and a priori tests. In J. G. Hunt and L. T. Larson (Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1974, pp. 29-55.
19.
HOUSE, R. J., & MITCHELL, T. R.Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, Autumn 1974, 81-97.
20.
HULIN, C. L., & SMITH, P. C.A linear model of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1964, 49, 209-216.
21.
HUNT, J. G., OSBORN, R. M., & LARSON, L. L.Upper level technical orientation of first level leadership within a noncontingency and a contingency framework. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 475-488.
22.
JOHNS, G.Task moderators of the relationship between leadership style and subordinate responses. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 319-325.
23.
KAHN, R. L., WOLFE, D. M., QUINN, R. P., SNOEK, J. D., & ROSENTHAL, R. A.Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley, 1964.
24.
KERR, S. I., SCHRIERHEIM, C. A., MURPHY, C. J., & STOGDILL, R. M.Toward a contingency theory of leadership based on the consideration and structure literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974,12, 62-82.
25.
LA ROCCO, J. M., & JONES, A. P.Co-worker and leader support as moderators of stress-strain relationships in work situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 629-634.
26.
LEFCOURT, H. M.Internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 65, 206-220.
27.
LODAHL, T. M., & KEJNER, M.The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 49, 24-33.
28.
LYKKEN, D. T.Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 151-159.
29.
MACDONALD, A. P.Internal-external locus of control. In J. P. Robinson and P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, Institute of Social Research, 1974.
30.
MITCHELL, T. R., SMYSER, C. M., & WEED, S. E.Locus of control: Supervision and work satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 623-630.
31.
PRYER, M. W., & DISTEFANO, M. K.Perceptions of leadership, job satisfaction, and internal-external control across three nursing levels. Nursing Research, 1971, 2, 534-537.
32.
RIZZO, J. R., HOUSE, R. J., & LIRTZMAN, S. I.Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15, 150-163.
33.
ROTTER, J. B.Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966, 80 (Whole No. 609).
34.
RUNYON, K. E.Some interactions between personality variables and management styles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 288-294.
35.
SAUNDERS, D. R.Moderator variables in prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956, 16, 209-222.
36.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., & KERR, S. I.Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 756-765.
37.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., & MURPHY, C. J.Relationships between leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction and performance: A test of some situational moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 634-641.
38.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., & STOGDILL, R. M.Differences in factor structure across three versions of the Ohio State leadership scales. Personnel Psychology, 1975, 28, 189-206.
39.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., & VON GLINOW, M. A.The path-goal theory of leadership: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20, 398-405.
40.
SCHULER, R. S., ALDAG, R. J., & BRIEF, A. P.Role conflict and ambiguity: A scale analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977, 20, 113-125.
41.
SIMS, H. P., Jr., & SZILAGYI, A. D.Leader structure and subordinate satisfaction for two hospital administrative levels: A path analysis approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 194-197.
42.
STINSON, J. E., & JOHNSON, T. W.The path-goal theory of leadership: A partial test and suggested refinement. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 242-252.
43.
STOGDILL, R. M.Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire-Form XII. Columbus, Ohio: Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University, 1963.
44.
STOGDILL, R. M.Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press, 1974.
45.
SZILAGYI, A. D., & SIMS, H. P., Jr.An exploration of the path-goal theory of leadership in a health care environment. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 622-634.
46.
VALENZI, E., & DESSLER, G.Relationships of leader behavior, subordinate role ambiguity and subordinate job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 671-678.
47.
WEED, S. E., MITCHELL, T. R., & MOFFITT, W.Leadership style, subordinate personality, and task type as predictors of performance and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 58-67.
48.
ZEDECK, S.Problems with the use of "moderator" variables. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 295-319.
