In a natural setting, the influence of facial deformity on the response to a petition request was investigated. Seventy-two hundred adult members of the general public were confronted by four Actors who presented themselves normally for one-half of the experiment and exhibited a facial de-formity (burn scar, birthmark or protruding teeth) for the other half. The experiment was designed in order that the influence offacial appearance (4) x sex of Actor (2) x sex of passerby (2) x strength of petition (2) could be examined. Although the results confirm that the petition model is sensitive to variables of interpersonal perception, the principal finding was the non-effect of facial deformity with regard to the number of evasions, signings, and refusals obtained. It is suggested that aversion to the deformed petitioner may be tempered by other reactions such as curiosity and sympathy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADAMS, G. R.Physical attractiveness research. Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty. Human Development, 1977, 20(4), 217-239.
2.
BERSCHEID, E., WALSTER, E., & BOHRNSTEDT, G.The happy American body: A survey report. Psychology Today, 1973, 7, 119-131.
3.
BRYANT, N. J.Petitioning: Dress congruence versus belief congruence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975, 5(2), 144-149.
4.
CLIFFORD, E.Psychosocial aspects of orofacial anomalies: Speculations in search of data. ASHA Reports, 1973, No. 8, 2-29.
5.
COMER, R. J., & PILIAVIN, J. A.The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction: The other side. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 33-39.
6.
CROSS, J. F., & CROSS, J.Age, sex, race and the perception of facial beauty. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 5(3), 433-439.
7.
DOOB, A. N., & ECKER, B. P.Stigma and Compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 302-304.
8.
FARINA, A., ALLEN, J. G., & SAUL, B. B. B.The role of the stigmatized person in affecting social relationships. Journal of Personality, 1968, 36(2), 169-182.
9.
GOFFMAN, E.Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
10.
HEIDER, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
11.
KLECK, R., ONO, H., & HASTORF, A. H.The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction. Human Relations, 1966, 19, 425-436.
12.
KLECK, R., BUCK, P. L., GOLLER, W. L., LONDON, R. S., PFEIFFER, J. R., & VUKCEVIC, D. P.Effect of stigmatizing conditions on the use of personal space. PsychologicalReports, 1968,23, 111-118.
13.
LANGER, E. J., FISKE, S., TAYLOR, S. E., & CHANOWITZ, B.Stigma, staring and discomfort: A novel-stimulus hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976, 12, 451-463.
14.
LANSDOWN, R., & POLAK, L.A study of the psychological effects of facial deformity in children. Child-care, health and development, 1975, 1, 85-91.
15.
LATANE, B.Field studies of altruistic compliance. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1970, 1, 49-61.
16.
LERNER, R. M., KARABENICK, S. A., & STUART, J. L.Relations among physical attractiveness, body attitudes and self-concept in male and female college students. Journal of Psychology, 1973, 85, 119-129.
17.
LEVITT, L., & KORNHABER, R. C.Stigma and compliance: A re-examination. Journal of Social Psychology, 1977, 103, 13-18.
18.
MACGREGOR, F.Social and psychological implications of dentofacial disfigurement. Angle Orthodontist, 1970, 40(3), 231-233.
19.
MACGREGOR, F., ABEL, T., LAUER, E., BRYT, A., & WEISSMANN, S.Facial deformities andplastic surgery. A psycho-social study. New York: Thomas, 1953.
20.
MCGARRY, M. S., & WEST, S. G.Stigma among the stigmatized: Resident mobility, communication ability, and physical appearance as predictors of staff-resident interaction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1975, 84(4), 399-405
21.
NOVAK, P. W., & LERNER, M. J.Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 147-152.
22.
PILIAVIN, I. M., PILIAVIN, J. A., & RODIN, J. Costs, diffusion and the stigmatized victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32(3), 429-438.
23.
RICHARDSON, S. A.Research report. Handicap, appearance and stigma. Social Science and Medicine, 1971, 5, 621-628.
24.
ROSENBERG, M. J., HOVLAND, C. I., MCGUIRE, W. J., ABELSON, R. P., & BREHM, J. W.Attitude organization and change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960.
25.
SOBLE, S. L., & STRICKLAND, L. H.Physical stigma, interaction and compliance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974, 4(2B), 130-132.
26.
SUEDFELD, P., BOCHNER, S., & MATAS, C.Petitioner's attire and petition signing by peace demonstrators: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1971, 1(3), 278-283.
27.
TERRY, R. L., & DAVIS, J. S.Components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 42, 918-918.
