This study develops the Burns and Stalker (1961) concept of organic structure, in operational terms, applying it to small work groups. A core dimension emerges, called "organicity, " which correlates strongly with the innovativeness of a group's task. The concept and the instruments for its measurement could find applications in studying the relation between individuals and their organizational work roles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AIKEN, M., & HAGE, J.The organic organization and innovation. Sociology1971, 5, 63-82.
2.
BURNS, T. & STALKER, G. M.The management of innovation. London: Tavistock, 1961.
3.
HACKMAN, J. R. & LAWLER, E. E.Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology1971, 55, 259-286.
4.
HACKMAN, J. R. & OLDHAM, G.Development of job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology1975, 60, 159-170.
5.
HALL, R. H.Some organizational considerations in the professional-organizational relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly1967, 12(4), 461-478.
6.
HALL, R. H.Professionalization and bureaucratization, American Sociological Review1968, XXXIII(1), 92-104.
7.
HARE, A. P.Handbook of small group research. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962.
8.
HARVEY, E.Technology and structure of organizations. American Sociological Review1968, XXXIII, 274-259.
9.
LAWRENCE, P. R., & LORSCH, J. W.Organization and environment. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School, 1967.
10.
MILLER, R. E.Innovation, organization and environment: (a study of 16 American and European steel firms). Univerit6 Catholique de Louvain; Institut de Recherche et de Perfectionnement en Administration; Universit6 de Sherbrooke, P. Q., Canada, 1971.
11.
PIERCE, J. R. & DELBECQ, A. L.Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review1977, 2(1), 27-37.
