Effects of Changes in Job Characteristics on Some Theory-Specific Attitudinal Outcomes: Results from a Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment

Abstract

The present research examined changes in motivational properties of jobs as measured in the theoretical context of Hackman and Oldham's [19761 job characteristics model through a quasi-experimental design. In an effort to reduce utility costs, a manufacturing organization underwent a planned change from a 5-to a 4-day work week. Changes in characteristics ofjobs in the organization which resulted from the shortened work week were introduced without regard for the motivational consequences of the new schedule. Neither "expectation levels" (King, 1974) nor organizational policies pertaining to the reward system were changed when the 4-day work week was implemented. The overall design of the planned change resembled that of a quasi-experiment, permitting examination of the causal impact of changes in core job dimensions on employee attitudinal outcomes. Measures of core job dimensions and outcome variables were collected before and after the change. Results showed that the group characterized by an increase in the motivational properties of their jobs experienced corresponding changes in theory-specific attitudinal outcomes. While there was no effect on employee growth need strength (GNS) as a result of the changes in motivational properties of jobs per se, high GNS employees did respond more sensitively and predictably to changes in their jobs than did low GNS employees.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BRIEF, A. P. , & ALDAG, R. J. Employee reactions to job characteristics: A constructive replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 182-186.

DUNHAM, R. B. The measurement and dimensionality of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61(4), 404-409.

DUNHAM, R. B. , ALDAG, R. J. , & BRIEF, A. P. Dimensionality of task design as measured by the Job Diagnostic Survey. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20(2), 209-223.

FOTTLER, M. D. Employee Acceptance of a Four Day Work Week. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20(4), 659-659.

FRANK, L. L. , & HACKMAN, J. R. A failure of job enrichment: The case of change that wasn't. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11(4), 413-436.

HACKMAN, J. R. , & LAWLER, E. E. Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, (Monograph) 1971, 55(3), 259-286.

HACKMAN, J. R. , & OLDHAM, G. R. Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.

HACKMAN, J. R. , & OLDHAM, G. R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250-279.

HACKMAN, J. R. , PEARCE, J. L. , & WOLFE, J. C. Effects of changes in job characteristics on work attitudes and behaviors: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 21, 289-304.

10.

KING, A. Expectation effect in organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19(2), 221-230.

11.

KORNHAUSER, A. Mental health of the industrial worker: A Detroit study. New York: Wiley, 1965.

12.

OLDHAM, G. R. Job characteristics and internal motivation: The moderating effect of interpersonal and individual variables. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 559-569.

13.

OLDHAM, G. R. , HACKMAN, J. R. , & PEARCE, J. L. Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61,(4), 395-403.

14.

PETERS, L. H. , & BHAGAT, R. S. Sample-specific versus conceptual dimensions of job design: A utility analysis. In W. J. Duncan (Ed.), Proceedings of the academy of management (Southwest Division), 1979.

15.

UMSTOT, D. D. , BELL, C. J. , & MITCHELL, T. R. Effects of job enrichment and task goals on satisfaction and productivity: Implications for job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61(4), 379-394.

16.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE . Work in America: Report of a special task force to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1973.

17.

WALKER, C. R. , & GUEST, R. H. The man on the assembly line. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1952.

18.

WANOUS, J. P. Individual differences and reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 616-522.