This paper proposes a theoretical model of technology that consists of three elements: workflow predictability, task predictability, and job interdependence. Various configurations of these three elements can be formed into "cells" that describe different technologies. The different modes of managerial control and self-regulation associated with each cell are discussed. The paper then combines the technology model with Hackman and Oldham's model of job redesign to form an integrated technology/job redesign model. Various relationships between technology and job characteristics are explored. A major conclusion develops from this discussion: in order to change the job characteristics that are associated with a target work system, the unavoidable introduction of uncertainty is necessary. The amount of self-regulation and the perceived degree of autonomy are shown to be critical variables that link technology and job redesign principles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALBER, J. An exploratory study of the benefits and costs of job enrichment. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 1977.
2.
ALDAG, R., & BRIEF, A.Task design and employee motivation. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman, 1979.
3.
ANDERSON, C., HELLRIEGEL, D., & SLOCUM, J.Managerial response to environmentally induced stress. Academy of Management Journal1977, 20, 260-272.
4.
BILLINGS, R., KLIMOSKI, R., & BREAUGH, J.The impact of a change in technology on job characteristics: A quasi-experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly1977, 22, 318-339.
5.
BRAGG, J., & ANDREWS, I.Participative decision making: An experimental study in a hospital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1973, 9, 727-735.
6.
COMSTOCK, D., & SCOTT, W. R.Technology and the structure of subunits: Distinguishing individual and workgroup effects. Administrative Science Quarterly1977, 20, 177-202.
7.
CUMMINGS, T.Self-regulating work groups: A sociotechnical synthesis. Academy of Management Review1978, 3, 625-634.
8.
FORD, J., & SLOCUM, J.Size, technology, environment and the structure of organizations. Academy of Management Review1977, 2, 561-575.
9.
GLISSON, C.Dependence of technological routinization on structural variables in human service organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly1978, 23, 383-395.
10.
HACKMAN, J. R.Work design. In J. R. Hackman and J. L. Suttle (Eds.), Improving life at work. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing Company, 1977. Pp. 96-162.
11.
HACKMAN, J. R., & LAWLER, E. E.Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology1971, 55 (3), 259-286.
12.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology1975, 60, 159-170.
13.
HAGE, J., & AIKEN, M.Routine technology, social structure and organization goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 366-376.
14.
HALL, R.Professionalism and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 92-104.
15.
HICKSON, D., HINNINGS, C., LEE, C., SCHNECK, R., & PENNINGS, J.A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly1971, 16, 216-229.
16.
HREBINIAK, L.Job technology, supervision and work group structure. Administrative Science Quarterly1974, 19, 395-410.
17.
KATZ, R.Job longevity as a situational factor in job satisfaction. Administrative Science Quarterly1978, 23, 204-223.
18.
KOVNER, A. The nursing unit: A technological perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, School of Public and International Affairs, 1968.
19.
MANZ, C., & SIMS, H. P.Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 1980, in press.
20.
MARCH, J., & SIMON, H.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
21.
MEISSNER, M.Technology and the worker. San Francisco: Chandler, 1969.
22.
MILLER, E. J., & RICE, A. K.Systems of Organization. London: Tavistock, 1967.
OUCHI, W., & MAGUIRE, M.Organizational control: Two functions. Administrative Science Quarterly1975, 20, 559-569.
25.
OVERTON, R., SCHNECK, R., & HAZLETT, C.An empirical study of the technology of nursing subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly1977, 20, 203-219.
26.
PERROW, C.A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review1967, 32, 194-208.
27.
REEVES, K., & WOODWARD, J.The study of managerial control. In J. Woodward (Ed.), Industrial organization: Behavior and control. London: Oxford University Press, 1970.
28.
ROUSSEAU, D.Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction and motivation: A synthesis of job design research and sociotechnical systems. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance1977, 19, 18-42.
29.
ROUSSEAU, D.Characteristics of departments, positions and individuals: The relationship of context to attitudes and behaviors. Administrative Science Quarterly1978, 24, 521-540.
30.
ROUSSEAU, D.Assessment of technology in organizations: Closed versus open systems approaches. Academy of Management Review1979, 4, 531-542.
31.
STANFIELD, G.Technology and organization structure as theoretical categories. Administrative Science Quarterly1976, 21, 489-493.
32.
SUSMAN, G.Autonomy at work: A sociotechnical analysis of participative management. New York: Praeger, 1976.
33.
TABER, T.The meaning of job meaningfulness. Paper presented at 10th Annual Meeting, American Institute for Decision Sciences, St. Louis, Mo., November 1978.
34.
THOMPSON, J.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
35.
TRIST, E. L., & BAMFORTH, K. W.Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations1951, 4, 3-38.
36.
VAN DE VEN, A.A revised framework for organizational assessment. Center for the Study of Organizational Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Schol. To be published In E. Lawler, D. Nadler, and C. Cammann (Eds.), Organizational assessment: Perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of working life. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1979.
37.
VAN DE VEN, A., & DELBECQ, A.A task contingent model of work-unit structure. Administrative Science Quarterly1974, 19, 183-197.
38.
VAN DE VEN, A., DELBECQ, A., & KOENIG, R.Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review1976, 41, 322-338.
