Managers' perceptions of political activity associated with different situations, functional areas, and hierarchical levels were studied in 30 organizations. Politics was perceived to be related to power, uncertainty, and importance of the issue to the organization and to the individual. Perceived negative andpositive instrumentalities of politics werefoundfor individuals and organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BALDRIDGE, J. V. Power and conflict in the university. New York: Wiley, 1971.
2.
BARNARD, C. I.The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1938.
3.
BERLE, A. A.Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1967.
4.
BLAU, P.Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.
5.
BUCHER, R.Social process and power in a medical school In M. N. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt Press, 1970.
CALDER, B. J.An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & C. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press, 1977.
8.
CARTWRIGHT, D., & ZANDER, A.Power and influence in groups: An introduction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
9.
CROZIER, The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
10.
DAHL, R. A.Power. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social sciences (Vol. 12). New York: Macmillan and the Free Press, 1968.
DUBIN, R.Theory building (Rev. ed.). New York: The Free Press, 1978.
13.
EMERSON, R. E.Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 31-41.
14.
FRENCH, J. R. P., & RAVEN, B.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
15.
GROSS, B. M.Political process. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12). New York: Macmillan and the Free Press, 1968.
16.
HARVEY, E.Technology and structure of organizations. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 249-249.
17.
HARVEY, E., & MILLS, R.Patterns of organizational adaptation. In M. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press, 1970.
18.
HICKSON, D. J., HININGS, C. R., LEE, C. A., SCHNECK, R. E., & PENNINGS, J. M.A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 11, 216-217.
19.
KATZ, D., & KAHN, R. L.The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1966.
20.
LASSWELL, H. D.Politics-Who gets what, when, how. In The Political Writings of Harold D. Lasswell. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1951.
21.
LASSWELL, H. D., & KAPLAN, A.Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.
22.
LAWRENCE, P., & LORSCH, J. W.Organization and environment. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1967.
23.
LEWIN, K.Principles of topologicalpsychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
24.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
25.
MARTIN, N. H., & SIMS, J. H.Power tactics. In D. A. Kolb, I. M. Rubin, & J. M. McIntyre (Eds.), Organizational psychology: A book of readings (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
26.
MAYES, B. T., & ALLEN, R. W.Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2,(4), 672-678.
27.
McCLELLAND, D. C.The two faces of power. In D. Kolb, I. Rubin, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Organizational psychology: A book of readings (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
28.
McGRATH, J. E.Toward a "theory of method" for research in organizations. In W. W. Cooper, H. J. Leavitt, & M. W. Shelly (Eds.), New perspectives in organizational research. New York: Wiley, 1964.
29.
PATCHEN, M.The locus and basis of influence on organizational decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 11, 195-221.
30.
PERROW, C.The analysis of goals in complex organizations. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 854-866.
31.
PERROW, C.Departmental power and perspectives in industrial firms. In M. N. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations. Nashville, Tenn.: University Press, 1970.
32.
PETTIGREW, A. M.The politics of organizational decision-making. London: Tavistock, 1973.
33.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G.Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of the university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19(2), 135-151.
34.
PFIFFNER, J. M., & SHERWOOD, J. P.Administrative organization. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1960.
35.
PORTER, L. W.Organizations as political animals. Presidential Address, Division of Industrial-Organizational Psychology, 84th Annual Meeting of American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September 4, 1976.
36.
ROBBINS, S. P.The administrative process: Integrating theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
37.
ROGERS, R. E.The political process in modern organizations. New York: Exposition Press, 1971.
38.
SCOTT, A.Management: A political process: Overt vs. covert. American Council on Education, 57th annual meeting, October 10, 1974.
39.
SECORD, P. F., & BACKMAN, C. W.Social psychology. New York: Mcfiraw-Hill, 1964.
40.
STRAUSS, G.Tactics of lateral relationships: The purchasing agent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1962, 7, 161-186.
41.
THOMPSON, J.D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
42.
TUSHMAN, M. T.A political approach to organizations: A review and rationale. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2(2), 206-216.
43.
WALMSLEY, G. L., & ZALD, M. N.The political economy of public organizations. Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1973.
44.
WERGIN, J. F.The evaluation of organizational policy making: A political model. Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46(1), 75-116.
45.
WILDAVSKY, A.Budgeting as a political process. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Crowell, Collier, and Macmillan, 1968.
46.
WOODWARD, J.Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.
47.
WRONG, D. H.Some problems in defining social power. American Journal of Sociology, 1968, 73, 673-681.
