The dynamics of status concordance theory are explored in a heterogeneous sample of 67 ongoing interdisciplinary research teams in universities. This theory implies positive relationships between concordance and coordination, coordination and success, and a positive but spurious correlation between concordance and success. Our findings show coordination posi-tively related to success at all stages of team development; concordance positively related to coordination only during early phases of team develop-ment; concordance positively related to success for young teams, unrelated for middle-aged teams, and negatively related for older teams. These patterns remain with coordination statistically controlled. We conclude that status concordance can depress as well as elevate a team's overall success, and that external status criteria play a decreasingly important role in the co-ordination of interdisciplinary teams.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADAMS, S.Status congruency as a variable in small group performance. Social Forces, 1953, 32, 16-22.
2.
ALPERT, D.The role and structure of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research cen-ters. Washington, D.C.: Council of Graduate Schools of the U.S., 1969.
3.
BALES, R. F., & SLATER, P. E.Role differentiation. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, M. Zel-ditch, J. Olds, & P. Slater (Eds.), Family sociolization and interaction process. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1955.
4.
BALES, R. F., STRODTBECK, F. L., MILLS, T. M., & ROSEBOROUGH, M. E.Channels in communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, August 1951, 16, 461-468.
5.
BECKHARD, R.Organizational issues in the team delivery of comprehensive health care. AMillbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1972, 3, 590-613.
6.
BENNIS, W. G., & SHEPARD, H. A.A theory of group development. Human Relations, 1956, 9, 415-437.
7.
BERGER, J., & CONNER, T. L.Performance expectations and behavior in small groups. Acta Sociologica, 1969, 12, 186-198.
8.
BERGER, J., ZELDITCH, M., JR., ANDERSON, B., & COHEN, B. P.Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In Joseph Berger, Morris Zelditch, Jr., & Bo Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, Chap. 6). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
9.
BIRNBAUM, P. H.Assessments of alternative management forms in academic interdiscipli-nary research projects. Management Science, 1977, 24, 272-284.
10.
BIRNBAUM, P. H., NEWELL, W. T., & SAXBERG, B. O.Managing academic interdisci-plinary research projects. Decision Sciences, 1979, in press. (a)
11.
BIRNBAUM, P. H.A theory of academic interdisciplinary research performance: A contingency and path analysis approach. Management Science, 1979, in press. (b)
12.
BLACKWELL, G. W.Multidisciplinary team research. Social Forces, May 1955, 33, 367-374.
13.
BLALOCK, H. M.Social statistics (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
14.
BLAU, P. M., & DUCAN, O. D.The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley, 1967.
15.
BLUMSTEIN, P., & WEINSTEIN, E. H.Redress of distributive injustice. American Journal of Sociology, 1969, 74, 408-418.
16.
BOGER, R. P.Organizational ploicy issues affecting interdisciplinary education research and research training. Mimeographed, 1973.
17.
CAPLOW, T.The sociology of work. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
18.
CAPLOW, T.How to run any organization. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.
19.
CAUDILL, W., & ROBERTS, B. H.Pitfalls in the organization of interdisciplinary re-search.HumanOrganization, 1951, 10, 12-15.
20.
COLLINGS, O.Ethnic behavior in industry: Sponsorship and rejection in New England. American Journal of Sociology, 1946, 51, 293-298.
21.
DAVIS, S. M., & LAWRENCE, P. R.Matrix. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
22.
EATON, J. W.Social processes of professional teamwork. American Sociological Review, October 1951, 16, 707-713.
23.
EVAN, W. M., & SIMMONS, R. G.Organizational effects of inequitable rewards: Two experiments in status inconsistency. Administration Science Quarterly, 1969, 4, 224-237.
24.
EXLINE, R. V., & ZILLER, R. C.Status congruency and interpersonal conflict in decision-making groups. Human Relations, 1959, 12, 147-162.
25.
FIELDER, F. E.A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
GILLESPIE, D. F., PERRY, R. W., & MILETI, D. S.Collective stress and community transformation. Human Relations, 1974, 27, 767-778.
28.
GILLESPIE, D. F. Organizational success: An initial inquiry. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Doctoral Dissertation, Sociology, 1976.
29.
GROSS, E.Work and society. New York: Thomas W. Crowell, 1958.
30.
GROSS, E. & GAMBSCH, P. V.changes in university organization, 1964-1971. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.
31.
HAGSTROM, W. O.Traditional and modern forms of scientific teamwork. Administra-tive Science Quarterly, December 1964, 9, 241-263.
32.
HALL, R. H.Occupations and the social structure. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
33.
HEINICKE, C., & BALES, R. F.Developmental trends in the structure of small. Sociometry, February1953, 16, 7-38.
34.
HERZOG, J. D.The productivity of undermanaged research: Five years of the Harvard R & D center. Journal of Research and Development in Education, Summer 1972, 5, 33-49.
35.
HOFFMAN, L. R.Homogenity of member personality and its effects on group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 58, 27-32.
36.
HOFFMAN, L. R., & MAIER, R. F.Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 401-407.
37.
HOROWITZ, J. J.Dimensions of rehabilitative teamwork. Rehabilitation Record, 1970, 10, 37-40.
38.
IBADI, V. M. Successful technological innovation: Sources of information and effects of communications among organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1977.
39.
KAST, F. E., ROSENZWIEG, J. E., & STOCKMAN, J. W.Interdisciplinary programs in a university setting. Academy of Management Journal, September 1970, 13, 311-324.
40.
KINGDON, D. R.Team or group development: The development of dyadic relationships. Human Relations, 1974, 27, 169-177.
41.
KLUCKHOHN, C.An anthropologist looks at psychology. American Psychologist, June 1948, 3, 439-442.
42.
LAWRENCE, P. R., & LORSCH, J. W.Organization and environment. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1969.
43.
LAZARSFELD, P. F., & MENZEL, H.On the relation between individual and collective properties. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), Complex organizations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964.
44.
LENSKI, G. E.Social participation and status crustallization. American Sociological Re-view, August 1956, 21, 458-464.
45.
LIFEBOWITZ, B.A method for the analysis of the thematic structure of t groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March-April 1972, 8, 149-173.
46.
LODAHL, J. B., & GORDON, G.The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review, February 1972, 37, 57-72.
47.
LUSZKI, M. B.Team research in social science: Major consequences of a growing trend. Human Organization, 1957, 16, 21-24.
48.
LUSZKI, M. B.Interdisciplinary team research: Methods and problems. New York: New York University Press, 1958.
49.
MAHONEY, T. A., & WEITZEL, W.Managerial models of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, September 1969, 14, 357-365.
50.
MANN, R. D., GIBBARD, G. S. & HARTMAN, J. J.Interpersonal styles and group de-delopment. New York: Wiley, 1967.
51.
MAR, B. W., & NEWELL, W. T.Assessment of selected RANN environmental modeling efforts. A report for the environmental systems and resources division of the National Science Foundation research aplied to national needs, June, 1973.
52.
MC EVOY, J. III.Multi and interdisciplinary research-problems of initiation, control, integration, and reward. Policy Sciences, July 1972, 3, 201-208.
53.
MEADER, R. G.Sponsoring organized university research. In G. P. Bush & L. H. Hattery (Eds.), Teamwork in research. Washington, D.C.: American University Press, 1953.
54.
MILLS, T.Group transformation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
55.
NAGI, S. Z.Teamwork in health care in the U.S.: a sociological perspective. Health and Society, Winter 1975, 10, 75-90.
56.
NEWELL, W. T., SAXBERG, B. O., & BIRNBAUM, P. H.Management of interdiscipli-nary research in universities faces problems: An overview. Working paper No. 1. Seattle, Washington: Research management improvement program, University of Washington, November 19, 1974.
57.
PAGE, T.Selecting the research team. In G. P. Bush & L. H. Hattery (Eds.), Teamwork in research, Washington, D.C.: The American University Press, 1953.
58.
PALMER, A. M. (Ed.). Research centers directory (4th ed.). Detroit, Michigan: Gale Research Company, 1972.
59.
PELZ, D. C., & ANDREWS, F. M.Scientists in organizations: Productivity climates for re-search and development. New York: Wiley, 1966.
60.
PENN, R.Occupational prestige hierarchies: A great empirical invariant. Social Forces, December 1975, S4, 355-355.
61.
PETCH, H. E.Keynote address No. 1, third session: R & D, the next fifteen years in univer-sities."Twenty-fourth National Conference on the Administration of Research, September 23-26, 1970.
62.
REISS, A. J.Occupations and social status. New York: The Free Press, 1961.
63.
ROSENFELD, E.The social stratification in a "classless" society. American Sociological Review, 1951, 16, 766-774.
64.
SIEGEL, P. Prestige in the american occupational structure. Unpublished doctoral disserta-tion, University of Chicago, 1971.
65.
SINGER, J. E.The effect of status congruence and incongruence on group functioning. Dissertation Abstracts, 1966, 27, 1932.
66.
SMITH, C. G.Scientific performance and the composition of research teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, December 1971, 16, 486-495.
67.
STORER, N. W., & PARSONS, T.The disciplines as a differentiating force. In E. B. Montgomery (Ed.), The foundation of access to knowledge-a symposium. Syracuse, New York: Division of Summer Sessions, Syracuse University, 1968.
68.
THEODORSON, G. A.Elements in the progressive development of small groups. Social Forces, 1953, 31, 311-320.
69.
WARNER, W. L., MEEKER, M., & EELLS, K.Social class in America. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1949.
70.
WEICK, K. E.Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, March 1976, 21, 1-19.
71.
ZELDITCH, M., BERGER, J., & COHEN, B. P.Stability of organizational status structures. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 1, Chap. 12). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1966.
