Compatibility and Task Group Performance

Abstract

The study examines whether Schutz's aggregate index for measuring compatibility is useful for the formation of work teams, and whether compatibility is more relevant to socioemotional aspects of a group rather than task achievement aspects. Nine subcompatibilities for each subject were determined using the FIRO-B survey. Subcompatibilities were subsequently correlated to dependent measures of team member effectiveness, competence, and friendliness. Results indicate that Schutz's aggregate compatibility index conceals the different degree and kind of relationship between subcompatibilities and the dependent variables. Additionally, relationships between subcompatibilities and socio-emotional dependent measures were more often significant than relationships with task achievement measures but the effect was not pronounced. Consequently there appears to be little utility in seriously examining compatibility when forming a work group. Further theorizing is done concerning the underlying static nature of Schutz's theory and an alternative dynamic model is proposed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ARGYRIS, C. Explorations in interpersonal competence-I . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965, 1, 58-83 .

CENTERS, R. , & GRANVILLE, A. C. Reciprocal need gratification in intersexual attraction: A test of the hypotheses of Schutz and Winch . Journal of Personality, 1971, 39, 26-43 .

CHERVANY, N. L. , & HEINEN, J. S. The structure of a student project course . Decision Sciences, 1975, 6(1), 174-183 .

HACKMAN, J. R. , & MORRIS, C. G. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press , 1975.

HEWETT, T. T. , O'BRIEN, G. E. , & HORNIK, J. The effects of work organization, leadership style, and member compatibility upon the productivity of small groups working on a manipulative task . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 11, 283-301 .

HILL, R. E. Interpersonal compatibility and workgroup performance . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11 (2), 210-219 .

HUTCHERSON, D. E. Relationships among teacher-pupil compatibility, social studies grades and selected factors . Dissertation Abstracts International, 1963, 24, 5194-5194 .

JANIS, I. L. Victims of group think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin , 1972.

KERCKHOFF, A. C. , & DAVIS, K.E. Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection . American Sociological Review, 1962, 27(3), 295-303 .

10.

LIDDELL, W. W. The effects of individual-role compatibility upon group performance . Dissertation Abstracts International, 1970 (August), 32(2-B), 1191-1192 .

11.

MOOS, R. H. , & SPEISMAN, J. C. Group compatibility and productivity . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65 (3), 190-196 .

12.

NIE, N. , BENT, D. H. , & HULL, C. H. Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1970.

13.

POLLACK, H. B. Change in homogeneous and heterogeneous sensitivity training groups . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 37(1), 60-66 .

14.

REDDY, W. B. , & BYRNES, A. Effects of interpersonal group composition on the problem solving behavior of middle managers . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56(6), 516-517 .

15.

ROBBINS, S. P. Managing organizational conflict. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1974.

16.

SAPOLSKY, A. Relationship between patient-doctor compatibility, mutual perception and outcome of treatment . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 70-76 .

17.

SCHUTZ, W. C. The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books , 1966.

18.

SHALINSKY, W. Group composition as a factor in assembly effects . Human Relations, 1969, 22(5), 457-464 .

19.

UNDERWOOD, W. J. , & KRAFFT, L. J. Interpersonal compatibility and managerial work effectiveness: A test of the fundamental interpersonal relations orientation theory . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58(1), 80-94 .