This paper describes a self-systemic approach to the study of personality structure and process. Personality is conceptualized as organized around the ways one is committed to identifying oneself. Central to personality structure are those social roles the person is committed to performing. These role identities are the fundamental criteria by which goals, activities, and situations are selected by the person. Associated with role identities are identity goals, self-attributed characteristics that the person is motivated to exemplify when he or she is performing a particular role identity. Normative expectations are the person's beliefs as to which behaviors will express his or her identity goals. Data from a longitudinal and a cross-sectional sample of students supported this conceptualization. The theory is contrasted with the traditional self-concept approach, and is applied to an analysis of personality consistency; development, and adaptability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALEXANDER, C. N., JR. , & KNIGHT, G. W.Situated identities and social psychological experimentation . Sociometry, 1971, 34, 65-82 .
2.
ALLPORT, G. W.Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt , 1937.
3.
ALLPORT, G. W.The open system in personality theory . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 301-311 .
4.
ANASTASI, A.Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan , 1968.
5.
ANDERSON, N. H.Likableness ratings of 555 personality trait words . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 272-279 .
6.
AVERILL, J. R.A semantic atlas of emotional concepts . JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1975, 5, 330-330 . (Ms. No. 1103)
7.
BEM, D. J.Constructing cross-situational consistencies in behavior: Some thoughts on Alker's critique of Mischel . Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 17-26 .
8.
BEM, D. J. , & ALLEN, A.On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior . Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 506-520 .
9.
BEM, S. L.Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634-643 .
10.
BLUMSTEIN, P. W.Audience, Machiavellianism, and tactics of identity bargaining . Sociometry, 1973, 36, 346-363 .
11.
BOWERS, K. S.Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique . Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 307-335 .
12.
BRIM, O. C., JR. , & WHEELER, S.Socialization after childhood: Two essays. New York: Wiley , 1967.
13.
BUCKLEY, W.Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1967.
14.
FEATHER, N. T.Values in education and society. New York: Free Press , 1975.
15.
GOUGH, H. G.Personality and personality assessment. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally , 1976.
16.
HEILBRUN, A. B., JR.Measurement of masculine and feminine sex role identities as independent dimensions . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 183-190 .
17.
JACKSON, J. M.A conceptual and measurement model for norms and roles . Pacific Sociological Review, 1966, 9, 35-47 .
18.
JACKSON, J. M.Normative power and conflict potential . Sociological Methods and Research, 1975, 4, 237-264 .
19.
KLINGER, E.Meaning and void: Inner experience and the incentives in people's lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press , 1977.
20.
KUHN, M. H. , & MCPARTLAND, T. S.An empirical investigation of self-attitudes . American Sociological Review, 1954, 19, 68-76 .
21.
MCCALL, G. J. , & SIMMONS, J. L.Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press , 1966.
22.
MILLER, D. R.The personality as a system. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press , 1970.
23.
MILLS, C. W.Situated actions and vocabularies of motive . American Sociological Review, 1940, 5, 904-913 .
24.
MISCHEL, W.Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley , 1968.
25.
PARSONS, T.The position of identity in the general theory of action. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley , 1968.
26.
PRUS, R. C.Resisting designations: An extension of attribution theory into a negotiated context . Sociological Inquiry, 1975, 45, 3-14 .
27.
ROSS, L. , BIERBRAUER, G. , & HOFFMAN, S.The role of attribution processes in conformity and dissent: Revisiting the Asch situation . American Psychologist, 1976, 31, 148-157 .
28.
SCOTT, M. B. , & LYMAN, S. M.Accounts . American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 47-62 .
29.
SMELSER, W. T.Dominance as a factor in achievement and perception in cooperative problem solving interactions . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 535-541 .
30.
SNYDER, M.Self-monitoring of expressive behavior . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 526-537 .
31.
STOLL, C. S.Female and male: Socialization, social roles, and social structure. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown , 1974.
32.
STRAUSS, A.Mirrors and masks: The search for identity. New York: Free Press , 1959.
33.
STRYKER, S.Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1968, 30, 558-564 .
34.
TODER, N. L. , & MARCIA, J. E.Ego identity status and response to conformity pressure in college women . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 287-294 .
35.
WACHTEL, P. L.Psychodynamics, behavior therapy, and the implacable experimenter: An inquiry into the consistency of personality . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1973, 82, 324-334 .
36.
WYLIE, R. C.The self-concept: A review of methodological considerations and measuring instruments (Rev. ed., Vol. 1). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press , 1974.
37.
ZURCHER, L. A., JR. , MEADOW, A. , & ZURCHER, S. L.Value orientation, role conflict, and alienation from work: A cross-cultural study . American Sociological Review, 1965, 30, 539-548 .
