This paper extends Barth's concept of ethnic boundaries and boundary strength to include boundaries maintained by other groups, and to propose that various types of human groups may be related on a continuum through the quality or strength of their boundaries. Three different types of groups "simple" groups, subcultural groups, and ethnic groups-are used to examine this concept in greater detail. It is further suggested that the concept of a continuum of boundary strength may be used to identify various stages of ethnic development, and that the notion of boundary has important implications for studies of urban ethnicity and human identity processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABLER, T. S.The political significance of incongruent boundaries: The case of the Seneca nation . Man in the Northeast1973, No. 5, 37-46 .
2.
BAINTON, R. H.The reformation of the sixteenth century. Boston: Beacon Press , 1952.
3.
BARTH, F.Ecological relationships of ethnic groups in Swat, North Pakistan . American Anthropologist, 1956, 58, 1079-1089 .
4.
BARTH, F. (Ed.). Ethnic groups and boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown and Company , 1969.
5.
BENNETT, J. W.Hutterian brethren: The agricultural economy and social organization of a communal people. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press , 1967.
6.
BENNETT, J. W.Northern plainsmen: Adaptive strategy and agrarian life. Chicago: Aldine , 1969.
7.
CLARK, B. W.The Hutterian communities . Journal of Political Economy, 1924, 32, 357-374, 468-486 .
8.
COOK, R. C.The North American Hutterites: A study in human multiplication . Population Bulletin, 1954, 10, 47-107 .
9.
DEETS, L. E. The Hutterites: A study in social cohesion. Gettysburg, Pennsylvania: Times and News Publishing Company (Columbia University PhD dissertation, Faculty of Political Science), 1939.
10.
EATON, J. W.Controlled acculturation: A survival technique of the Hutterites . American Sociological Review, 1952, 17, 331-340 .
11.
EATON, J. W. , & MAYER, A. J.Man's capacity to reproduce: The demography of a unique population . Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press , 1954. Reprinted from Human Biology, 1953, 26(3), 206-264 .
12.
EATON, J. W. , & WEIL, R. J.Culture and mental disorders: A comparative study of Hutterites and otherpopulations. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press , 1955.
13.
ERIKSON, E. H.Identity and the life cycle . Psychological Issues Monograph1(1). New York: International Universities Press , 1959.
14.
FRIEDMANN, R.Hutterite studies. Goshen, Ind.: Mennonite Historical Society , 1961.
15.
GLAZER, N. , & MOYNIHAN, D. P.Beyond the melting pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press , 1963.
16.
GROSS, P. S.The Hutterite way. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Freeman Publishing Company , 1965.
17.
HALLOWELL, A. I.Behavioral evolution and the emergence of the self. In B. Meggars (Ed.), Evolution and anthropology: A centennial appraisal. Washington, D.C.: The Anthropological Society of Washington , 1959.
18.
HALLOWELL, A. I.Self, society, and culture in phylogenetic perspective. In S. Tax (Ed.), The evolution of man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1960.
19.
HOFER, P.The Hutterian Brethren and their beliefs. Starbuck, Manitoba: The Hutterian Brethren of Manitoba (approved by the Committee of Elders), 1955.
20.
HOMANS, G. C.The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc. , 1950.
21.
HORSCH, J.The Hutterite Brethren, 1528-1931: A story of martyrdom and loyalty. Goshen, Ind.: The Mennonite Historical Society , 1931.
22.
HOSTETLER, J. A.Hutterite society. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press , 1974.
23.
HOSTETLER, J. A. , & HUNTINGTON, G. E.The Hutterites in North America. New York and Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc. , 1967.
24.
JOLLY, A.The evolution of primate behavior. New York: Macmillan , 1972.
25.
KAPLAN, B. , & PLAUT, T. F. A.Personality in a communal society. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Publications , 1956.
26.
KLASSEN, P. J.The economics of Anabaptism, 1525-1560. The Hague: Mouton , 1964.
27.
KRAHN, C. (Ed.). The Mennonite encyclopedia. A comprehensive reference work on the Anabaptist-Mennonite movement. Four volumes. Scottdale, Pennsylvania: The Mennonite Publishing House , 1955.
28.
LIEBOW, E.Tally's corner. A study of Negro street corner men. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company , 1967.
29.
LITTELL, F. H.The Anabaptist view of the church. Boston: Beacon Press , 1958.
30.
LOBB, H.The Hutterites and Saskatchewan. A study of inter-group relations. Regina, Saskatchewan: The Canadian Mental Health Association , 1953.
31.
MILGRAM, S.The experience of living in cities . Science, 1970, 167(3924), 1461-1468 .
32.
MORRIS, H. S.Ethnic groups. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences, Vol. 5. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe , 1968, pp. 167-172.
33.
NAROLL, R.On ethnic unit classification . Current Anthropology, 1964, 5(4), 283-312 .
34.
NEUWIRTH, G.A Weberian outline of a theory of community: Its application to the 'Dark Ghetto.'The British Journal of Sociology, 1969, 20(2), 148-163 .
35.
PETERS, V.All things common: The Hutterian way of life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press , 1965.
36.
RIDEMAN, P.Account of our religion, doctrine, and faith. Translated by K. E. Hasenberg from the German edition of 1565. London: Hodder and Stoughton, Ltd. , in conjunction with the Plough Publishing House, 1950.
37.
SEBALD, H.Adolescence: A sociological analysis. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts , 1968.
38.
THOMPSON, H. S.Hell's angels. New York: Random House , 1967.
39.
TROELTSCH, E.The social teachings of the Christian churches.Translated by 0. Wyon. New York: Macmillan , 1931.
40.
WILLMS, A. M.The Brethren known as Hutterians . Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1958, 24 (3), 391-405 .
