The major purpose of this article is to reassess the adequacy of the major principles of sociotechnical systems theory by means of a detailed reexamination of the case studies from which they are partly derived. It is shown, as a result, that the notion of a single, homogeneous sociotechnical school is a misleading oversimplification, since two streams of sociotechnical theory can in fact be identified. It is suggested that the autonomy granted to autonomous work groups is limited, and subordinate to particular economic objectives. Further, it is argued that the concept of joint optimization has little connection with the reality of sociotechnical practice and that it should be replaced with the notion of intensification of labor. The role of pay incentives is also shown to have been seriously underestimated in the causation of economic and psychological changes. And finally, the idea of organizational choice is also shown to be inadequate on the grounds that the case studies have demonstrated the superior economic and psychological effectiveness of only one form of work organization: autonomous groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AGUREN, S. , HANSSON, R. , & KARLSSON, K. G.The Volvo Kalmar plant. Stockholm: The Rationalisation Council, SAF-LO , 1976.
2.
BALDAMUS, W.Efficiency and effort. London: Tavistock , 1961.
3.
BROWN, R. K.Research and consultancy in industrial enterprises . Sociology, 1967, 1, 33-60 .
4.
BUCKLOW, M.A new role for the work group. In L. E. Davis & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design of Jobs. Haimondsworth: Penguin , 1972.
5.
CURRIE, R. M.Work study. London: Pitman , 1972.
6.
DAVIS, L. E.Toward a theory of job design . Industrial Engineering, 1957, 8, 305-309 .
7.
DAVIS, L. E.The design of jobs. In L. E. Davis , & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design of jobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1972. (a)
8.
DAVIS, L. E.Job satisfaction research: The post-industrial view. In L. E. Davis & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design ofjobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1972. (b)
9.
DAVIS, L. E.The coming crisis for production management. In L. E. Davis & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design of jobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1972. (c)
10.
DAVIS, L. E.Readying the unready: Post-industrial jobs. In L. E. Davis & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design of jobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1972. (d)
11.
DAVIS, L. E.Developments in job design. In P. B. Warr (Ed.), Personal goals and work design. London: Wiley , 1976.
12.
DURKHEIM, E.The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press , 1964.
13.
EMERY, F. E.Characteristics of socio-technical systems. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc. 527 , 1959.
14.
EMERY, F. E.The democratisation of the workplace. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc. T813 , 1966.
15.
EMERY, F. E.The assembly-line-Its logic and our future. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University, Occasional papers in Continuing Education No. 7 , 1975.
16.
EMERY, F. E. , & THORSRUD, E.Form and content in industrial democracy. London: Tavistock , 1964.
17.
EMERY, F. E. , & THORSRUD, E.Democracy at work. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Continuing Education , 1975.
18.
ENGELSTAD, P.Socio-technical approach to problems of process control. In L. E. Davis , & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design ofjobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1972.
19.
GIDDENS, A.Capitalism and modern social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1971.
20.
GULOWSEN, J.A measure of work-group autonomy. In L. E. Davis , & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design of jobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1972.
21.
GULOWSEN, J.Organisational design in industry-Towards a democratic socio-technical approach . Personnel Review, 1973, 2, 30-37 .
22.
HALES, M.Management science and "The Second Industrial Revolution."Radical Science Journal, 1974, 1, 5-28 .
23.
HERBST, P.G. Autonomous group functioning. London: Tavistock , 1962.
HUNT, R. G.On the work itself: Some observations concerning relations between tasks and organisational processes. In E. J. Miller (Ed.), Task and organisation. London: Wiley , 1976.
26.
KATZ, D. , & KAHN, R. L.The social psychology of organisations. London: Wiley , 1966.
27.
LAWLER, E. E., III . Pay and organisational effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1971.
28.
LINDHOLM, R. , & NORSTEDT, J. P.The Volvo report. Stockholm: SAF , 1975.
29.
LUKES, S.Alienation and anomie. In P. Laslett & W. G. Runciman (Eds.), Philosophy, politics and society (3rd Series). Oxford: Blackwell , 1967.
30.
LUPTON, T.Shopfloor behaviour. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of work, organisation and society. Chicago: Rand McNally , 1976.
MARX, K.Economic and philosophical manuscripts. In K. Marx , Early writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1975.
33.
MILLER, E. J.Technology, territory, and time: The internal differentiation of complex production systems . Human Relations, 1959, 12, 243-272 .
34.
MILLER, E. J.Sociotechnical systems in weaving, 1953-1970: A follow-up study . Human Relations, 1975, 28, 349-386 .
35.
MILLER, E. J. , & RICE, A. K.Systems of organisation. London: Tavistock , 1967.
36.
MILLS, T.Altering the social structure in coal mining: A case study . Monthly Labour Review, 1976, 99(Oct.), 3-10 .
37.
OWEN SMITH, E.Productivity bargaining. London: Pan , 1971.
38.
PAYNE, R. L. , & PUGH, D. S.Organisations as psychological environments. In P. B. Warr (Ed.), Psychology at work. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1971.
39.
PUGH, D. S. , HICKSON, D. J. , & HININGS, C. R.Writers on organisations (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1971.
40.
RICE, A. K.Productivity and social organisation in an Indian weaving shed . Human Relations, 1953, 6, 297-329 .
41.
RICE, A. K.Productivity and social organisation. London: Tavistock , 1958.
42.
RICE, A. K.The enterprise and its environment. London: Tavistock , 1963.
43.
RICE, A. K.Individual, group, and intergroup processes. In E. J. Miller (Ed.), Task and organisation. London: Wiley , 1976.
44.
ROSE, M.Industrial behaviour: Theoretical development since Taylor. London: Allen Lane , 1975.
45.
ROY, S. K.A re-examination of the methodology of A. K. Rice's Indian textile mill work reorganisation . Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 1969, 5, 170-191 .
46.
SILVERMAN, D.The theory of organisation. London: Heinemann , 1970.
47.
SLAUGHTER, C.The strike of Yorkshire mine workers in May, 1955 . Sociological Review, 1958, 50, 241-259 .
48.
SUSMAN, G.Autonomy at work: A socio-technical analysis of participative management. New York: Praeger , 1976.
49.
TAYLOR, F. W.Scientific management. New York: Harper & Bros. , 1947.
50.
THORSRUD, E.Sociotechnical approach to job design and organisational development. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc. X394 , 1967.
51.
THORSRUD, E.Job design in the wider context. In L. E. Davis & J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design of jobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1972.
52.
THORSRUD, E.Collaborative action research to enhance the quality of working life. In L. E. Davis & A. B. Cherns (Eds.), The quality of working life, Vol. 1. New York: Free Press , 1975.
53.
THORSRUD, E. , SORENSEN, B. A. , & GUSTAVSEN, B.Sociotechnical approach to industrial democracy in Norway. In R. Dubin , (Ed.), Handbook of work, organisation, and society. Chicago: Rand McNally , 1976.
54.
TRIST, E. L.Comparative study of some aspects of mining systems in a Northern coalfield. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc. 434 , 1956.
55.
TRIST, E. L.Critique of scientific management in terms of socio-technical theory. In M. Weir (Ed.), Job satisfaction. London: Fontana , 1976.
56.
TRIST, E. L. , & BAMFORTH, K.Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting . Human Relations, 1951, 4, 3-39 .
57.
TRIST, E. L. , & MURRAY, H.Work organisation at the coal face. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc. 506 , 1958.
58.
TRIST, E. L. , HIGGIN, G. , MURRAY, H. , & POLLOCK, A. B.Organisational choice. London: Tavistock , 1963.
59.
TRIST, E. L. , SUSMAN, G. , & BROWN, G. W.An experiment in autonomous working in an American underground coal mine . Human Relations, 1977, 30, 201-236 .
60.
VAN BEINUM, H. J.The morale of the Dublin busmen. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations , 1966.
61.
VAN DER ZWAAN, A. A.The sociotechnical systems approach: A critical evaluation . International Journal of Production Research, 1975, 13, 149-163 .
62.
WOOD, S. J. , & KELLY, J. E.Towards a critical management science . Journal of Management Studies, 1978, 15, 1-24 .
