This paper represents a critique of the increasingly fashionable contingency theories, relating to such areas as organization, structure, management style, and orientation to work. Certain aspects of contingency theory represent a backlash effect against neohuman relations. The claim of contingency theorists that their approach is less value-laden than that of human relations appears doubtful. Only the contrast in values, rather than the absence, is apparent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDERFER, C. P.An empirical test of a new theory of human needs . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1969, 4, 142-176 .
2.
ARGYRIS, C.Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley , 1964.
3.
ARGYRIS, C.The applicability of organisational sociology. London: Cambridge University Press , 1972.
4.
BALDAMUS, W.Efficiency and effort. London: Tavistock , 1961.
5.
BLAUNER, R.Alienation and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1964.
6.
BROWN, R.Sources of objectives in work and employment. In J. Child (Ed.), Man and organisation. Woking and London: Allen & Unwin , 1973.
7.
BROWN, C. , & MILLAR, J.Job design change: An assessment of the potential for crossnational research on job redesign. Report to SSRC, 1974.
8.
BURNS, T. , & STALKER, J.The management of innovation. London: Tavistock , 1961.
9.
CHILD, J. (Ed.). Man and organisation. Woking and London: Allen & Unwin , 1973.
10.
COOPER, R.Task characteristics and intrinsic motivation. Human Relations, 1973.
11.
COTGROVE, S. , & BOX, S.Science, industry, and society. Allen & Unwin, 1970.
12.
CYERT, R. , & MARCH, J.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall , 1963.
13.
DANIEL, W. W.Understanding employee behaviour in its context: Illustrations from productivity bargaining. In J. Child (Ed.), Man and organisation. Woking and London: Allen & Unwin , 1973.
14.
DREYFUS, C.Alchemy and artificial intelligence. Santa Monica, California: Rand Co. Mem. P-3244 , 1965.
15.
DUBIN, R.Power, function and organization . Pacific School Review, 1963, 6.
16.
DUNNETTE, M. D. , CAMPBELL, J. P. , & HAKEL, M. D.Factors contributing to job satis faction and job dissatisfaction in six occupational groups . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1967, 12.
FAXEN, K.Research on self-developing forms of organisation. Ravello Conference Paper, 1971.
19.
GOLDTHORPE, J.Social stratification in industrial society. Sociological Review Monograph No. 8, 1964, pp. 97-131.
20.
GOLDTHORPE, J. , LOCKWOOD, D. , BECHHOFER, F. , & PLATT, J.The affluent worker. Cambridge: University Press , 1968.
21.
HACKMAN, J. R. , & LAWLER, E.Employee reactions to job characteristics . Journal of Applied Psychology Monthly, 1971, 55, 259-286 .
22.
HACKMAN, J. R. , & OLDHAM, G. R.Development of the job diagnostic survey . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170 .
23.
HALL, D. T. , & NOUGAIM, K. E.An examination of Maslow's need hierarchy in an organizational setting . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3.
24.
HENEMAN, H. G. , & SCHWAB, D. P.Evaluation of research on expectancy theory. Psychology Bulletin, 1972.
25.
HICKSON, D. , PUGH, D. S. , & PHEYSEY, D. C.Operations technology and organisational structure: An empirical reappraisal . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14.
26.
HULIN, C. , & BLOOD, M.Job enlargement, individual differences and worker responses . Psychology Bulletin, 1968, 69, 41-55 .
27.
INGHAM, G.Size of industrial organisation and worker behaviour. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. , 1970.
28.
INKSON, J. , PUGH, D. S. , & HICKSON, D. J.Organisation context and structure: An abbreviated replication . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15, 318-329 .
29.
KERR, S. , SCHRIESHEIM, C. A. , MURPHY, C. J. & STOGDILL, R. M.Towards a contingency theory of leadership based upon consideration and initiating structure literature . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 12.
30.
KING, A. S.Expectation effects in organisational change . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19, 221-230 .
31.
KOHN, M. , & SCHOOLER, M.Class, occupation, and orientation. American Sociological Review, 1969.
32.
LAWLER, E. E. , & PORTER, L.Antecedent attitudes of effective managerial performance . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1967, 2.
33.
LAWRENCE, P. R. , & LORSCH, J. W.Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University Press , 1967.
34.
LIKERT, R.The human organization: Its management and value. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1967.
35.
LUPTON, T.Management and the social sciences. Manchester: Penguin , 1971 (Reprint).
36.
MARCH, J. , & SIMON, H.Organizations. New York: Wiley , 1958.
SHEPHARD, J.Automation and alienation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press , 1971.
42.
SILVERMAN, D.The theory of organisations. London: Heineman , 1970.
43.
STEERS, R. M.Effects of need for achievement on the job performance, job attitude relationship . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 678-683 .
44.
THOMPSON, J. D. , & BATES, F. E.Technology, organization, and administration . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, 2, 325-343 .
45.
TRIST, E. A. , & BAMFORTH, K. W.Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting . Human Relations, 1951, 4.
46.
TURNER, A. , & LAWRENCE, P.Industrialjobs and the workers. Cambridge: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration , 1965.
47.
TURNER, B.Exploring the industrial subculture. New York: Macmillan , 1971.
48.
WATERS, L.An empirical test of five versions of the twofactor theory of job satisfaction . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1972, 7, 18-25 .
49.
WOODWARD, J.Industrial organisations. London: Oxford University Press , 1965.
