Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between an individual's scenario about his own future and his characterizing behaviors within the institutional setting. Statements made by 87 persons about their own futures (5 years ahead) are examined, coded (in terms of the person's ease of projecting himself into the future situation), and related with measures of the person's overall performance and activism within the organizational system. The relationships (and nonrelationships) found indicate that there are behaviorally important differences in individual styles of cognizing one's own future. Two different orientations toward futurity seem to be evidenced from these results and those previously reported by the author in Human Relations. The first is a facility to project oneself ahead and to picture one's own future, which is associated with active participation in the ongoing organizationalprocesses. The second is a motivation to generate multiple images of alternatives to the prevailing system, which is associated with organizational activism and innovative behavior.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADLER, A. Individual psychology. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930. Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press , 1930, pp. 395-405.

ALLPORT, G. W. Becoming. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press , 1955.

BULL, W. E. Time, tense and the verb. Berkeley: University of California , 1968, pp. 1-33.

CASSIRER, E. An essay on man. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press , 1944, p. 53-53.

EVERED, R. D. Conceptualizing the "future": Implications for strategic management in a turbulent environment (doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1973). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1974, 34, #7.

EVERED, R. D. Organizational activism and its relation to "reality" and mental imagery . Human Relations, 1977, 30, 311-334 .

FRENCH, J. R. P. , KAY, E. , & MEYER, H. H. Participation and the appraised system . Human Relations, 1966, 19, 3-19 .

GOLDSTEIN, K. The organism. New York: American Book Co. , 1939.

HAMNER, W. C. , & HARNETT, J. L. Goal-setting, performance, and satisfaction in an interdependent task . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 12, 217-230 .

10.

HAMPTON, D. R. The planning-motivation dilemma . Business Horizons, 1973, 16, 79-87 .

11.

IVANCEVICH, J. M. Changes in performance in a management by objectives program . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19, 563-574 .

12.

JESPERSEN, O. The philosophy of grammar. New York: Norton , 1965, Chap. 19, p. 254-254.

13.

KAHN, H. , & WIENER, A. J. The year2000: A frameworkfor speculation on the next thirtyfive years, New York: Macmillan , 1967, p. 6-6.

14.

LATHAM, G. P. , & YUKL, G. A. Assigned versus partipative goal-setting with educated and uneducated wood-workers . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60(3), 299-302 .

15.

LEWIN, K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1936, p. 37-37.

16.

LEWIN, K. Time perspective and morale. In G. W. Lewin & G. W. Allport (Eds.), Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper , 1948, pp. 103-124.

17.

LEWIN, K. Defining the "field" at a given time. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science. New York: Harper , 1951, p. 43-43.

18.

LOCKE, L. A. Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3, 157-189 .

19.

McCASKEY, M. B. A contingency approach to planning: Planning with goals and planning without goals . Academy of Management Journal, 1974, No. 2, 281-291 .

20.

RAIA, A. P. Goal setting and self-control: An empirical study . Journal of Management Studies, 1965, 2, 32-53 .

21.

REINHARDT, K. F. The existential revolt. New York: Frederick Ungar , 1960, p. 228-228.

22.

RONAN, W. W. , LATHAM, G. P. , & KINNE, S. B. Effects of goal-setting and supervision on worker behavior in an industrial setting . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58(3), 302-307 .

23.

TOFFLER, A. Learning for tomorrow: The role of the future in education. New York: Vintage , 1974, p. 10-10.

24.

TOFFLER, A. The eco-spasm report. New York: Bantam , 1975.

25.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES (UCLA) . MBA Program Announcement. Graduate School of Management, UCLA , 1971.

26.

VROOM, H. V. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley , 1964.

Personal Scenarios: An Empirical Study of Their Relation to Individual Performance and to Organizational Activism

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References