Community-based corrections is a new dimension being added to the milieu of correctional devices for the criminal offender. One of the primary purposes of community-based corrections is the delivery of service, aiding in the reintegration of the offender into the community. Organization exchange theory is utilized as the theoretical basis for program implementation, a three-stage model is developed as a planning guideline for the acquisition of needed services, and afinal model is presented which serves an implementation function for the "ideal-type" model presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACKOFF, R. L. , & EMERY, F. E.On purposeful systems. New York: Aldine Atherton , 1972, p. 57-57.
2.
BRAITO, R. , PAULSON, S. , & KLONGLON, G.Domain consensus: A key variable in interorganization analysis. In M. Brinkerhoff & P. Kunz (Eds.), Complex organizations and their environments. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company , 1972, pp. 176-192.
3.
BERRY, D. E.The transfer of planning theories to health planning practice . Policy Science, 1974, 5, 343-361 .
4.
BURDMAN, M.Realism in community-based correctional services . Annals of the American Academy, 1969, 381, 71-80 .
5.
BURDMAN, M.Reintegration of the offender into the community. Crminal justice monograph: Reintegration of the offender into the community. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office , 1973.
6.
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES . Marshalling citizen power to modernize corrections. Washington, D.C.: An urban affairs publication of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States , 1970.
7.
ETZIONI, A.Mixed-scanning: A "third approach to decision-making."Public Administration Review, 1967 (December), 27, 385-392 .
8.
HAUREK, E. , & CLARK, J.Variants of integration of social control agencies . Social Problems, 1967, 15, 46-60 .
9.
KADISH, S. , & PAULSEN, M.Criminal law and its processes: case and materials. Boston: Little, Brown and Company , 1969, p. 65-65.
10.
LEVINE, S. , & WHITE, P. E.Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. In M. Brinkerhoff & P. Kunz (Eds.), Complex organizations and their environments. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company , 1972.
11.
LEVINE, S. , WHITE, P. E. , & PAUL, B.Community interorganizational problems in providing medical care and social services . American Journal of Public Health, 1963, 53, 1183-1195 .
12.
LINDBLOM, C. E.The science of "muddling through."PublicAdministration Review, 1959, 19, 79-99 .
13.
LITWAK, E. , & MEYER, H.A balance theory of coordination between bureaucratic organizations and community primary groups . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1966, 11, 31-58 .
14.
MANDELL, W.Making corrections a community agency . Crime and Delinquency, 1971(July), 17, 281-282 .
15.
MITFORD, J.Kind and usual punishment: The prison business. New York: Alfred A. Knopf , 1973.
16.
PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE . The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967 . (a)
17.
PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE . Task force report: Corrections. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office , 1967, p. 1-1. (b)
18.
SABIN, T.The myth of the criminal type. Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press , 1969.
19.
SKOLER, D.Future trends in juvenile and adult community-based corrections . Juvenile Court Judges Journal, 1971, 21, 98-98 .
20.
SULLIVAN, C. E.Changes in corrections: Show or substance?Manpower, 1971, 3, 2-7 .
21.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MANPOWER ADMINISTRATION . Manpower development and training in correctional programs: MDRA experimental and demonstration findings, No. 3. Washington, D.C.: Office of Information, Publications and Reports, U.S. Department of Labor , 1969.
