Four leadership styles were varied to study effects on individual risk-taking behavior in group settings. Democratic and authoritarian leadership styles significantly depressed a shift toward risk in groups when compared to laissez-faire led groups and no designated leader groups. These findings were in opposition with the usual shift toward risk noted when individuals meet in groups. Future research directions and implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BARON, R. , DION, K. , BARON, P. , & MILLER, N.Group consensus and cultural values as determinants of risk-taking . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 3, 446-455 .
2.
BATESON, N.Familiarization, group discussion, and risk-taking . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 2, 119-129 .
3.
BELL, P. , & JAMIESON, B.Publicity of initial decisions and the risky shift phenomenon . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1970, 6, 329-345 .
4.
BROWN, R.Social psychology. New York:Free Press of Glencoe , 1965.
DION, K. . MILLER, N. , & BARON, R.Why do groups make riskier decisions than individuals? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Current advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press , 1970.
7.
FIEDLER, F. E.A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Current advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press , 1964.
8.
FRASER, C.Group risk-taking and group polarization . Paper presented at the European Association of Social Psychology Conference, Kanstanz, 1970.
9.
HALPIN, A. W.The leadership behavior and leadership ideology of educational administrators and aircraft commanders . Harvard Educational Review, 1955, 25, 18-32 .
10.
JONES, E. E. , & GERARD, H. B.Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley , 1967.
11.
KATZ, D. , & KAHN, R.Some reet findings in human relations research in industry. In G. E. Swanson , T. M. Newcomb , & R. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (Rev. ed.). New York: Holt , 1952.
12.
KOGAN, N. , & WALLACH, M.Risk-taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt , 1964.
13.
LAMM, H.Will an observer advise high risk-taking after hearing a discussion of a decision problem?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 6, 467-471 .
14.
LEWIN, K. , LIPPITT, R. , & WHITE, R.Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created "social climates."Journal of Social Psychology, 1938, 10, 271-299 .
15.
LIPPITT, R. , & WHITE, R.Leader behavior and member reaction in three "social climates." In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row , 1960.
16.
MARQUIS, D. G.Individual responsibility and group decisions involving risk . Industrial Management Review, 1962, 3, 8-23 .
17.
PRESTON, M. , & HEINZ, R.Effects of participatory vs. supervisory leadership on group judgement . Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1949, 44, 345-355 .
18.
PRUITT, D.Risky shift introduction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 330-358 .
19.
SCHACHTER, S.Deviation, rejection and communication . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951, 41, 190-207 .
20.
SHAW, M. , & BLUM, J.Effects of leadership style on group performance as a function of task structure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 238-242 .
21.
STONER, J. A. A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished MA thesis, School of Industrial Management, Massachusetts Institue of Technology, 1961.
22.
TOFFLER, A.Future shock. New York: Bantam Books , 1970.
23.
WALLACH, M. , & KOGAN, N.Aspects of judgement and decision-making: Interrelationship and changes with age . Behavioral Science, 1961, 6, 23-26 .
24.
WALLACH, M. , KOGAN, N. , & BEM, D.Group influence on individual risk-taking . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65, 75-86 .
25.
WHYTE, W.The organization man. New York: Simon and Schuster , 1956.
