Four dimensions of organizational hierarchy are identified: inequality of skills and knowledge, inequality of rewards, inequality of authority, and inequality of information distribution. Instead of the prevailing and largely untested hypothesis that hierarchical structure is positively related to organizational effectiveness, an alternative hypothesis is formulated, viz., that it is negatively related. This hypothesis is linked to a causal model interrelating hierarchical structure with work alienation, organizational commitment, and organizational effectiveness. Some evidence for the alternative hypothesis is examined. The four-dimensional concept is then used to assess the burgeoning literature on industrial democracy. The phenomenon of "shop-floor democracy" is conceptualized as involving a process of destratification with respect to allfour dimensions of hierarchy. In view of environmental pressuresfor the rationalization of organizations as well as the secular trend in this direction, a destratification-rationalization hypothesis is formulated: As the positive slope of the relationship between these two clusters of variables increases, organizational effectiveness increases and work alienation decreases. To test this hypothesis an experimental approach, whether in the laboratory or in the field, is essential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AIKIN, M. , & HAGE, J.Organizational alienation: A comparative analysis . American Sociological Review, 1966, 31 (August), 497-507 .
2.
BAVELAS, A.Communication patterns in task-oriented groups . Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 1950, 22, 725-730 .
3.
BLAU, P. M.A formal theory of differentiation in organizations . American Sociological Review, 1970, 35 (April), 201-218 .
4.
BLAU, P. M.Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations . Social Science Research, 1972, 1 (April), 1-24 .
5.
BLAUNER, R.Alienation and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1964.
6.
CAMPBELL, D. T.Reforms as experiments . American Psychologist, 1969, 24 (April), 409-429 .
7.
CAMPBELL, D. T.Methods for the experimenting society. Mimeographed, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University , 1973.
8.
COHEN, A. M.Changing small-group communication networks . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1962, 6 (March), 443-462 .
9.
CYERT, R. M. , & MARCH, J. G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1963.
10.
DAVIS, L. E. , & TRIST, E. L.Improving the quality of work life: Experience of the sociotechnical approach. Background paper commissioned by HEW for a report onWork in America (offset), 1972.
11.
DRENTH, P. J. D.The works' councils in the Netherlands. In P. H. Van Gorkum et al., Industrial democracy in the Netherlands. The Hague: J. A. Boon en Zoon, Meppel Publishers , 1969, pp..22-39.
12.
EDELSTEIN, J. D.An organizational theory of union democracy . American Sociological Review, 1967, 32 (April), 19-31 .
13.
EMERY, F. E. , & THORSRUD, E.Form and content in industrial democracy. London: Tavistock Publications , 1969.
14.
EMERY, F. E. , & THORSRUD, E.Democracy at work: Report of the Norwegian industrial democracy program. Canberra: Australian National University (offset), 1976.
15.
EMERY, F. E. , & TRIST, E. L.Socio-Technical Systems. In C. W. Churchman & M. Verhuilst (Eds.), Management science: Models and techniques, Vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press , 1960, pp. 173-191.
16.
EVAN, W. M.Indices of the hierarchical structure of industrial organizations . Management Science, 1963a, 9 (April), 468-477 .
17.
EVAN, W. M.Les conditions functionnelles d'existence d'organisations industrielles volontaires . Sociologie du travail, 1963b, 5 (Juillet-Septembre), 236-246 .
18.
EVAN, W. M.Organizational lag . Human Organization, 1966, 25 (Spring), 51-53 .
19.
EVAN, W. M. (Ed.). Organizational experiments. New York: Harper and Row , 1971.
20.
EVAN, W. M.Culture and organizational systems . Organization andAdministrative Sciences, 1975, 5 (Winter), 1-16 .
21.
EVAN, W. M.Organization theory and organizational effectiveness: An exploratory analysis . Organization and Administrative Sciences, 1976, 7 (Spring-Summer).
22.
FISCHER, G.Sociology. In G. Fischer (Ed.). Science and ideology in soviet society. New York: Atherton Press , 1967, pp. 1-46.
23.
GUETZKOW, H. , & SIMON, H. A.The impact of certain communication nets upon organization and performance in task-oriented groups . Management Science, 1955, 1 (April-July), 233-250 .
24.
HICKSON, D. J. , PUGH, D. S. , & PHEYSEY, D. C.Operations technology and organization structure: An empirical reappraisal . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14 (September), 378-397 .
25.
INGHAM, G. K.Organizational size, orientation to work and industrial behavior. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press , 1968.
26.
KATZ, D. , & KAHN, R. L.The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons , 1966.
27.
KAVCIC, B. , RUS, V. , & TANNENBAUM, A. S.Control, participation and effectiveness in four Yugoslav industrial organizations . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16 (March), 74-86 .
28.
KOLAJA, J.A Polish factory. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky , 1960.
29.
KOLAJA, J.Workers' councils: The Yugoslav experience. New York: Praeger , 1965.
30.
LAMMERS, C. J.Power and participation in decision-making in formal organizations . American Journal of Sociology, 1967, 73 (September), 201-216 .
31.
LEAVITT, H. J.Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951, 46 (January): 38-50 .
32.
LIPSET, S. M. , TROW, M. , & COLEMAN, J.Union democracy. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press , 1956.
33.
McWHINNEY, W. H. , & ELDON, J.A reticular society: New institutions for a post-industrial democracy . Paper presented at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Santa Barbara, California, 1972 (mimeographed).
34.
MELMAN, S.Decision-making and productivity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell , 1958.
35.
MELMAN, S.Industrial efficiency under managerial vs. cooperative decision making . Review of Radical Political Economics, 1970, 2 (Spring), 9-34 .
36.
MEYER, M. W.Size and structure of organizations: A causal analysis . American Sociological Review, 1972, 37 (August), 434-440 .
37.
MILLER, Sir B.Foreword to A. Flanders, R. Pomeranz, & J. Woodward, Experiment in industrial democracy. London: Faber and Faber , 1968, pp. 15-21.
38.
MILLER, G. A.Professionals in bureaucracy: Alienation among industrial scientists and engineers . American Sociological Review, 1967, 32 (October), 755-768 .
39.
MORSE, N. C. , & REIMER, E.The experimental change of a major organizational variable . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 52 (January), 120-129 .
MULDER, M. , & WILKE, H.Participation and power equalization . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1970, 5(September), 430-448 .
42.
OBRADOVIC, J.Participation and work attitudes in Yugoslavia . Industrial Relations, 1970, 9(February), 161-169 .
43.
OBRADOVIC, J.FRENCH, J. R. P., JR. , & RODGERS, W. L.Workers' councils in Yugoslavia . Human Relations, 1970, 23 (October), 459-471 .
44.
PONDY, L. R.Effects of size, complexity, and ownership on administrative intensity . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14 (March), 47-60 .
45.
PRICE, J. L.Organizational effectiveness: An inventory of propositions. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin , 1968.
46.
PRICE, J. L.Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath , 1972.
47.
PUGH, D. S. , HICKSON, D. J. , HININGS, C. R. , & TURNER, C.Dimensions of organization structure . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1968, 13, 33-47 .
48.
PUGH, D. S. , HICKSON, D. J. , HININGS, C. R. , & TURNER, C.The context of organization structures . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 94-114 .
49.
RAYTON, D.Shop floor democracy in action. London: Russell Ltd. , 1972.
50.
RUSHING, W. A.Organizational size, rules, and surveillance . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966a, 2 (February), 11-26 .
51.
RUSHING, W. A.Organizational rules and surveillance: Propositions in comparative organizational analysis . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1966b, 10 (March), 423-443 .
52.
RUSHING, W. A.The effects of industry, size and division of labor on administration . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, 12 (September), 273-295 .
53.
SEEMAN, M.On the meaning of alienation . American Sociological Review, 1959, 24 (December), 783-791 .
54.
SHAW, M. E.Some effects of problem complexity upon problem solution efficiency in different communication nets . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48 (September), 211-217 .
55.
SMITH, C. G. , & TANNENBAUM, A. S.Organizational control structure: A comparative analysis . Human Relations, 1963, 16 (Fall), 289-316 .
56.
TANNENBAUM, A. S.Control in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1968.
57.
TRIANDIS, H. C.Notes on the design of organizations. In J. D. Thompson (Ed.), Approaches to organizational design. Pittsburgh, Penna.: University of Pittsburgh , 1966, pp. 59-102.
58.
TRIST, E.The professional facilitation of planned change in organizations. In V. H. Vroom & E. L. Deci , (Eds.), Management and motivation. London: Penguin Books , 1970, pp. 349-362.
59.
TRIST, E.A socio-technical critique of scientific management. In D. O. Edge & J. N. Wolfe, Meaning and Control, London: Tavistock Publications , 1973, pp. 95-116.
60.
VAN GILS, M. R.Job design within the organization. In P. H. Van Gorkum et al., Industrial democracy in the Netherlands. The Hague: J. A. Boom en Zoon, Meppel Publishers , 1969.
61.
VAN GORKUM, P. H.Industrial democracy at the level of the enterprise. In P. H. Van Gorkum, et al., Industrial Democracy in the Netherlands. The Hague: J. A. Boom en Zoon, Meppel Publishers , 1969, pp. 9-21.
62.
WHISLER, T. L. , MEYER, H. , BAUM, B. H. , & SORENSEN, P. F., JR.Centralization of organizational control: An empirical study of its meaning and measurement . Journal of Business, 1967, 40 (January), 10-26 .
63.
WOODWARD, J.Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press , 1965.
64.
ZUPANOV, J. , & TANNENBAUM, A. S.The distribution of control in some Yugoslav industrial organizations as perceived by members. In A. S. Tannenbaum, Control in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1968.
