The study explores the thesis that group size, as it influences interaction patterns and attitudes of members within the immediate group situation, will affect the orientations toward societal change which become adopted by members. Twenty large (15-member) and twenty small (5-member) groups were compared. The groups were instructed to discuss and reach consensus on a set of conservatism-radicalism items. The findings supported hypotheses concerning: (1) a positive correlation between group size and member dissatisfaction; (2) a positive correlation between member dissatisfaction and group radicalism; and (3) a positive correlation between size and group radicalism. In addition, differences in these trends were observed as a function of sex composition of the groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABERLE, D. (1962). A note on relative deprivation theory as applied to millenarian and other cult movements. In Sylvia L. Thrupp (ed), Millenial dreams in action. (Comparative studies in society and history, supplement 2). The Hague .
2.
BALES, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley .
3.
BALES, R. F. (1954). In conference . Harv. Bus. Rev.32, 44-50 .
4.
BALES, R. F. & BORGATTA, E. F. (1955). Size of group as a factor in the interaction profile. Pp. 396-413 in A. P. Hare , E. F. Borgatta , & R. F. Bales (eds.), Small groups. New York: Knopf .
5.
BALES, R. F. , STRODTBECK, F. L. , MILLS, T. M. & ROSEBOROUGH, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups . Amer. Sociol. Rev.16, 461-468 .
6.
BASS, B. M. & NORTON, F. (1951). Group size and leaderless discussions .J. Appl. Psychol. 35, 397-400 .
7.
BERKOWITZ, M. 1. (1958). An experimental study of the relation between group size and social organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University. Summarized in E. J. Thomas & C. F. Fink, Effects of group size. Psychol. Bull. 1963, 60, 371-384.
8.
BREER, P. E. & LOCKE, E. A. (1965). Task experience as a source of attitudes. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press .
9.
CAMPBELL. A. , GURIN, G. & MILLER, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson .
10.
CARTER, L. F. , HAYTHORN, W. , MEIROWITZ, B. & LANZETTA, J. (1951). The relation of categorizations and ratings in the observation of group behavior . Hum. Rel.3, 239-254 .
11.
CARTWRIGHT, D. & ZANDER, A. (eds.) (1968). Group dynamics. (3rd Ed.) New York: Harper & Row .
12.
COYLE, G. L. (1930). Social process in organized groups. New York: R. R. Smith .
13.
DAWE, H. C. (1934). The influence of size of kindergarten group upon performance . Child Devel. 5, 295-303 .
14.
DION, KENNETH L. , BARON, R. S. & MILLER, N. (1970). Why do groups make riskier decisions than individuals? In L. Berkowitz (Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 5, New York: Academic Press . Pp. 306-377.
15.
DIXON, W. J. (1969). BMD biomedical computer programs. X-series supplement. Berkeley: University of California Press .
16.
DRAG, R. M. (1968). Experimenter behavior and group size as variables influencing self-disclosure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1969, 30, 2416.
17.
DURKHEIM, E. (1947). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press .
18.
FISHER, P. H. (1953). An analysis of the primary group . Sociometry16, 272-276 .
19.
FRYE, R. L. , SPRUILL, J. & STRITCH, T. M. (1964). Effect of group size on public and private coalescence, efficiency, and change . J. Soc. Psychol.62, 263-272 .
20.
GIBB, J. R. (1951). The effects of group size and of threat reduction upon creativity in a problem-solving situation . A mer. Psychol.6, 324-324 .
21.
HACKMAN, J. R. & VIDMAR, N. (1970). Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions . Sociometry33, 37-54 .
22.
HARE, A. P. (1952). Interaction and consensus in different sized groups . Amer. Sociol. Rev.17, 261-267 .
23.
HARE, A. P. (1962). Handbook of Small Group Researcb. Glencoe: Free Press .
24.
HESS, R. D. & TORNEY, J. V. (1967). The development of political attitudes in children. Chicago: Aldine .
25.
KADANE, J. B. & LEWIS, G. H. (1969). The distribution of participation in group discussions: An empirical and theoretical reappraisal . Amer. Sociol. Rev.34, 710-723 .
26.
KINNEY, E. E. (1953). A study of peer group social acceptability at the fifth grade level in a public school . J. Educ. Res.47, 57-64 .
27.
KLUCKHOHN, C. (1944). Navabo witchcraft. (Peabody Museum Papers, No. 22). Cambridge, Mass .
28.
KOGAN, N. & WALLACH, M. A. (1967). Risk taking as a function of the situation, the person, and the group. In G. Mandler , P. Mussen , N. Kogan , & M. A. Wallach , New Directions in Psychology IIl. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston . Pp. 111-278.
29.
LENTZ, T. F., JR. & colleagues of the Attitude Research Laboratory (1935). C-R opinionaire test manual. St. Louis: Character Research Association, Department of Education, Washington University . (5th printing, 1950.)
30.
MANNHEIM, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia. Translated by L. Wirth & E. Shils . New York: Harcourt, Brace .
31.
MARX, K. (1906). Capital. Translated by S. Moore & E. Aveling . New York: Modern Library .
32.
MILLER, N. E., JR. (1951). The effect of group size on decision-making discussions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. Summarized in E. J. Thomas & C. F. Fink, Effects of group size. Psych. Bull.,, 1963, 60, 371-384.
33.
MOSCOVICI, S. & ZAVALLONI, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.12, 125-135 .
34.
PARSONS, T. & BALES, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press .
35.
ROBINSON, J. P. , RUSK, J. G. & HEAD, K. B. (1968). Measures of political attitudes. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan .
36.
SHAH, F. B. (1966). The relationship of group size and divergent thinking among adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Stite University. Dissertation Abstracts 2 7, 926-927.
37.
SHAW, M. E. & WRIGHT, J. M. (1967). Scales for the measurement of attitudes. New York: McGraw-Hill .
38.
SLATER, P. E. (1958). Contrasting correlates of group size . Sociometry21, 129-139 .
39.
SLATER, P. E. (1966). Microcosm. Structural, psychological and religious evolution in groups. New York: Wiley .
40.
SOUTH, E. B. (1927). Some psychological aspects of committee work . J. Appl. Psychol.11, 348-368 .
41.
STEPHAN, F. F. & MISHLER, E. G. (1952). The distribution of participation in small groups: an exponential approximation . Amer. Soc. Rev.17, 598-608 .
42.
STOUFFER, S. A. (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties. New York: Doubleday .
43.
SWANSON, G. E. (1960). The birth of the gods. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press .
44.
SWANSON, GUY E. (1967). Religion and regime: a sociological account of the reformation.
45.
THOMAS, E. J. & FINK, C. F. (1963). Effects of group size . Psych. Bull. 60, 371-384 .
46.
ZILLER, R. C. (1957). Group size: a determinant of the quality and stability of group decisions . Sociometry20, 165-173 .
