Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To examine the applicability of Bern's self-perception theory to the reversal of cognitive dissonance, subjects wrote counter-attitudinal essays under conditions of high and low choice and were provided either no feedback or bogus feedback designed to increase their judgments of the strength, effectiveness and extremeness of their counter-advocacy. Bogus feedback reversed 74 per cent of the attitude change shown by subjects who wrote under conditions of high choice without feedback. Low choice subjects in both feedback conditions and control subjects showed no change. The findings are interpreted in terms of communicator credibility and it is proposed that additional variables identified by the self-perception theory might effectively inhibit attitude changes induced by cognitive dissonance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ARONSON, E. & CARLSMITH, J. M. (1963). Effect of severity of threat on the valuation of forbidden behavior . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66, 584-588 .

ARONSON, E. , TURNER, J. A. & CARLSMITH, J. M. (1963). Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67, 31-36 .

BEM, D. J. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1, 199-218 .

BEM, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena . Psychological Review 74, 183-200 .

BEM, D. J. & McCONNELL, H. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: on the salience of premanipulation attitudes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 14, 23-31 .

BREHM, J. W. & CROCKER, J. C. (1962). An experiment reported in J. W. Brehm and A. R. Cohen , Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Wiley . Pp. 133-136.

HARVEY, J. & MILLS, J. R. (1971). Effect of a difficult opportunity to revoke counterattitudinal action upon attitude change . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18, 201-209 .

JONES, R. A. , LINDER, D. E. , KIESLER, C. A. , ZANNA, M. & BREHM, J. W. (1968). Internal states or external stimuli: observers' attitude judgments and the dissonance theory -self-persuasion controversy . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4, 247-269 .

LEPPER, M. R. , ZANNA, M. P. & ABELSON, R. P. (1970). Cognitive irreversibility in a dissonance reduction situation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16, 191-198 .

10.

SNYDER, M. & EBBESEN, E. B. (1971). Dissonance awareness: a test of dissonance theory versus self-perception theory. Unpublished paper. Stanford University.

Retroactive Inhibition of Cognitive Dissonance by Increasing Intensity of Counter-advocacy

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References